Very interesting article on the US open Hogus for competition, if like it said the backkick did not score than this cannot be a good answer for the development of the sport of TKD. What is everyone else take on it.
>Pragalos is responsible for dan issuing conflicts and the controversial
>use of Adidas electronic hogu. . . . and in April of 2008, ETU used
>Adidas electronic hogu, which has not been approved by WTF, at
>the "18th European Taekwondo Championships". Many TKD people
>believe that WTF is losing the support of Europeans. ETU President
>Pragalos is known to have argued viciously against WTF electronic
>hogu committee members on February 3rd.
This is one of the key issues facing the WTF, the electronic hogu. The main
problem I think is that the WTF approved the wrong system. The LaJust
electronic scoring has too many flaws and simply does not work in a
tournament environment.
I heard a lot of feedback on the use of LaJust at this year's US Open and
the word is that LaJust is not the answer.
The first problem is that it was difficult, if not impossible to score back
kicks. Without back kicks, then the Taekwondo game is radically changed.
The second issue was the use of those socks by all competitors. I have been
told that wearing those LaJust socks at US Open was like sticking your feet
in a dirty used gym sock that you found in the locker room. Even if they
took the time to dry those socks out, and sprayed it with disinfectant, you
are still sticking your feet in dirty, used socks. Not good.
Third issue was that the scoring was very spotty. Most times it worked, for
roundhouse, but then sometimes it didn't. So scoring using LaJust was as
inconsistent or more inconsistent than using live corner judges. The rule in
place at US Open was that corners (who were still there to score punches and
head shots) would not score any body shots, even if they saw a clean solid
score which did not get registered by the electronic scoring. So referees
were still required, and still made judgment calls, but needless to say,
people were disappointed with LaJust.
I can understand why the ETU would want to use something other than LaJust
at its tournaments. LaJust seems to not work in the manner that it is
supposed to. Rumor has it that the only reason why LaJust was approved was
because someone got an envelope. I wonder if the envelope, if there was one,
was given to President Choue.
Having not seen the Adidas electronic hogu system, I cannot comment on its
reliability and functionality. I have seen Truescore, which is now been
picked up by Daedo, and can say that it has none of the issues facing
LaJust. Hopefully, with growing support from Europe and other areas of the
world, Daedo, Adidas or some other system, any system other than Dr. Choue's
LaJust system, gets implemented.
>Pragalos is responsible for dan issuing conflicts and the controversial
>use of Adidas electronic hogu. . . . and in April of 2008, ETU used
>Adidas electronic hogu, which has not been approved by WTF, at
>the "18th European Taekwondo Championships". Many TKD people
>believe that WTF is losing the support of Europeans. ETU President
>Pragalos is known to have argued viciously against WTF electronic
>hogu committee members on February 3rd.
This is one of the key issues facing the WTF, the electronic hogu. The main
problem I think is that the WTF approved the wrong system. The LaJust
electronic scoring has too many flaws and simply does not work in a
tournament environment.
I heard a lot of feedback on the use of LaJust at this year's US Open and
the word is that LaJust is not the answer.
The first problem is that it was difficult, if not impossible to score back
kicks. Without back kicks, then the Taekwondo game is radically changed.
The second issue was the use of those socks by all competitors. I have been
told that wearing those LaJust socks at US Open was like sticking your feet
in a dirty used gym sock that you found in the locker room. Even if they
took the time to dry those socks out, and sprayed it with disinfectant, you
are still sticking your feet in dirty, used socks. Not good.
Third issue was that the scoring was very spotty. Most times it worked, for
roundhouse, but then sometimes it didn't. So scoring using LaJust was as
inconsistent or more inconsistent than using live corner judges. The rule in
place at US Open was that corners (who were still there to score punches and
head shots) would not score any body shots, even if they saw a clean solid
score which did not get registered by the electronic scoring. So referees
were still required, and still made judgment calls, but needless to say,
people were disappointed with LaJust.
I can understand why the ETU would want to use something other than LaJust
at its tournaments. LaJust seems to not work in the manner that it is
supposed to. Rumor has it that the only reason why LaJust was approved was
because someone got an envelope. I wonder if the envelope, if there was one,
was given to President Choue.
Having not seen the Adidas electronic hogu system, I cannot comment on its
reliability and functionality. I have seen Truescore, which is now been
picked up by Daedo, and can say that it has none of the issues facing
LaJust. Hopefully, with growing support from Europe and other areas of the
world, Daedo, Adidas or some other system, any system other than Dr. Choue's
LaJust system, gets implemented.