CB Jones
Senior Master
Hunters also do more to cause extinction in animals than people who are anti hunting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hunters also do more to cause extinction in animals than people who are anti hunting
Ah yes the typical way of not being able to say anything back trying to hard to be funny
Ah yes the typical way of not being able to say anything back trying to hard to be funny
Yeah it seems that guy does it a lot...well humours all he has because by looking at his posts his only form of martial art training is driving his kid to karate class and sitting and watchingAh yes the typical way of not being able to say anything back trying to hard to be funny
Again you can't actually argue with it. But okay you go carry killing innocent animals to fuel your ego whatever works for youHow bout this then.
Everything you said is complete Bull****
nothing funny about that.
Hunters also do more to cause extinction in animals than people who are anti hunting
Ok well, people come up with all kinds of excuses to justify heinous behavior.Again....Thats more sit on a moral high horse and judge other peoples motives that you are just making assumptions about bull****
The idea that you are morally superior because you ate what you killed is non-sense.
To be fair, hunters in the US at least have done a lot for conservation. But this is mostly different from pure trophy hunting. Deer, Elk, ducks, geese, pheasants, rabbits, squirrels, are all game animals that are regularly eaten, and I don't have a problem with that as long as it is done responsibly, and with conservation in mind.Hunters also do more to cause extinction in animals than people who are anti hunting
To be fair, hunters in the US at least have done a lot for conservation. But this is mostly different from pure trophy hunting. Deer, Elk, ducks, geese, pheasants, rabbits, squirrels, are all game animals that are regularly eaten, and I don't have a problem with that as long as it is done responsibly, and with conservation in mind.
What is heinous is the pure trophy hunt, whether those animals are exotic or local, and particularly when the animals may be threatened or endangered, and some of which are undeniably highly intelligent, like elephants. Safari, where the wealthy pay for the privilege of shooting one of these animals for the adrenaline rush and for the trophy, is despicable behavior. There is a special place in Hell reserved for those people. And I don't even believe in Hell.
Ok, disagree then.I disagree. Conservation in the US was led by trophy hunters. Same thing is happening in Africa. Trophy Hunters are a big part of conservation there and like in the US when done responsibly it will greatly benefit many African game and non-game species.
I agree, but would qualify it a bit. SOME hunters (maybe even most).You believe it to be heinous because you don't understand it.
You make broad assumptions about people you don't know based on something you don't understand and then try to act like you have taken some kind of moral high ground.
Hunters do more for conservation than most people who are anti-hunting.
Ecology and nature tourism is a much better option in the long run
There are some few hunters who "get their rocks off" killing things.
I don't see a lot of value in breeding animals so that they can be hunted, which isn't conservation. I'm referring to businesses that breed animals and go around ahead of hunters, placing them so that they can be shot. That's not hunting
I do understand that hunting wildlife is necessary and helpful to the ecosystem, and have no concerns at all about it. And I understand that the hunters I mention above, along with some others who engage in questionable behavior, are a subset of hunters.
Agree...What I have a problem with is making the broad assumption that all trophy hunters are heinous and immoral.
I agree 100%
Agree
Why were these animals going extinct in the first place? They weren't naturally becoming extinct because of weather conditions, predation by other animals etc. Taking lives just for fun is just always going to be wrong.
Saying trophy hunters conserve wildlife is strange considering that the wildlife was going extinct because of trophy hunters in the first place.
It's all part of it. Of course poachers probably have a greater impact, but that is illegal, plain and simple. Trophy hunting may not be illegal, but it is immoral and heinous, and that's why there is debate around it. Some disgusting people want to do it. Other people say, wait a minute, there is a problem here...And the habitat loss is a consequence of human behavior. That's the real issue: humans caused the problem in the first place. Trophy hunters who claim rights based on conservation, have a twisted, bankrupt morality. They are opportunists who twist the conservation reality and use it to justify killing for fun. Special place in hell...Were animals going extinct because of Trophy Hunters?
Or were animals going extinct because of a combination of loss of habitat and poachers killing for profit?
Ok, this is a bizarre, twisted form of logic..And if these practices fail will you be ok with those species going extinct?