- Thread starter
- #201
Yes, and if you want to be effective you have to take all the buts into account.But, but, but....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, and if you want to be effective you have to take all the buts into account.But, but, but....
What do technique, timing, strategy can play in the following speed test?Well there is more to it than just speed with being able to block somebody's punch, there is also technique, timing, strategy, and so forth.
But there are other factors that have to be accounted for. For instance you have to specify what kind of punches we're talking about. With some punches your hand travels a very short distance as opposed to other punches where your hand covers a longer distance. The less distance you have to cover the more punches you will be able to throw per second. You will most likely be able to throw more lead hand jabs per second than rear hand straight punches as your hand has to cover a greater distance with the rear hand straight punch, but that does not mean your hand moves at a higher speed in MPH when throwing the lead hand jab as opposed to the rear hand straight punch.
Also somebody with shorter arms might be able to throw more punches per second because with shorter arms their hands will have to cover less distance to complete the punch as opposed to somebody with longer arms, but that also does not mean that the hands of somebody with shorter arms are going to be moving faster in MPH than the hands of somebody with longer arms.
You also have to take into account the time in between punches. With shorter intervals in between punches you will obviously be able to throw more punches in a given amount of time but that again is different than how fast your hand moves in MPH.
So it depends on what kind of speed we're talking about.
Well there is more to it than just speed with being able to block somebody's punch, there is also technique, timing, strategy, and so forth.
This is your fault now.Don't use the imperial system when doing physics, just don't. It's a pet peeve.
EDIT: AHHHHHH what do I do, I revived the thread!?Back row. Under the projector, please.
Although it will be a month before we see it.Don't use the imperial system when doing physics, just don't. It's a pet peeve.
EDIT: AHHHHHH what do I do, I revived the thread!?Back row. Under the projector, please.
Make it rhyme though…Anyone fancy a pun?
Odd, but using it for over 45-years in physics with no issue.Don't use the imperial system when doing physics, just don't. It's a pet peeve.
EDIT: AHHHHHH what do I do, I revived the thread!?Back row. Under the projector, please.
That could be massive.Only I think we might need to use some force over time
You must not be from the USA.Don't use the imperial system when doing physics, just don't. It's a pet peeve.![]()
Force [integrated] over time = impulseYes, but I think the OP is expecting an equal and opposite reaction
Odd, but using it for over 45-years in physics with no issue.
Force [integrated] over time = impulse
Impulse and reaction impulse is always the same (Newtons 3rd law)
This holds independent of details of mass or speed of the objects delivering impulse.
Only if one mix up and confuse the concepts of physical quantity, numerical value and unit.And if you chuck imperial measurement into a METRIC based system you end up with crashing spacecraft and inconsistent laws of physics.
Only if one mix up and confuse the concepts of physical quantity, numerical value and unit.
In theoretical physics one commonly uses "natural units" such as Planck units, this is to make the equations cleaner when you work with them. Physical law when written with declared units and not just numerical values are universal and invariant with respect to human made up units or conventions.