'Returning to the root' of your martial art

skribs

Grandmaster
Joined
Nov 14, 2013
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
2,535
Regarding old vs. new guitar amps - I think some of it is that whole "uncanny valley" thing. The idea is that things that are too perfect are creepy. Like a robot that looks just real enough to trick you into thinking it's human.

When an amp or a recording sounds too perfect, it loses a bit of its magic. It's also the problem with movies nowadays. Back in the day, you had to wonder "how did they do that?" Nowadays you just guess it's all CGI.
 

dvcochran

Grandmaster
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Messages
7,047
Reaction score
2,297
Location
Southeast U.S.
I have noticed there are some special effects shots done in miniatures and such that I like better than CGI.
 

O'Malley

Black Belt
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
623
Reaction score
536
I guess it's more about looking for the best exponents of your art.

Just like with cross-training, you ultimately want to add new skills and nuances to your own practice. Sometimes, this can mean "going back to the root", as most martial arts spread because their original practitioners were highly skilled. So you can certainly try to have the skills the old masters had, by "seeking what they sought". You can also train with the best modern practitioners, with the advantage that you'll be able to feel them for yourself and get instruction.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
There are still guitar amps (incuding high-end ones) marketed around that sound, too. Many of the DSP systems even claim to have some of that warmth to them. As you say, it may not be objectively "better", but many seek that sound.
well of course they can replicate it, the average windows ten computer has more processing power than a 90 recording studio, you can do much what you want to achieve the sound you want, even completely remix it if your so inclined

you really need an understanding of 60s and 70s recording techniques to under why they had that sound you crave

first they had rubbish mikes, they couldn't record low base say bellow 50 hzs and almost no treble about 12 khz.

second vinyl is a rubbish medium for music, they couldnt put much base on as it took up so much room and not much of the limit treble they had as it would cause all but the most expensive needles to skip, so what your left with is a slightly trebly mid range. they corrected this by designing amps ( and speakers) to put back what was missing in the original recording, ergo most of what you want is in the amp configuration and not on the record

that why classic album sound so poor through cd player and modern amp, your just getting whats on the recording, which isnt very good, unless its been remixed and then it seldom sounds like the original. the remix of hotel California is awful

a quick rejig of the setting to make it slightly blurry, lower the dynamic range to 12 bits,drop the high treble and boost the mid range base and it sounds just like the original played through an expensive tube amp, even my Samsung tablet has a @ make it sound like a tube amp@ function

all this is helped if you play it through some worn out speakers to get '' warmth'' as modern speaker are again to good for the music,
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Top