Guy and LFJ are up to their usual antics again, and it has become clear that the moderators are not going to do anything about it unless they use "bad words" or challenge someone to a fight. They repeatedly stir up dissent and are the very opposite of "friendly discussions." They purposefully bait people, don't answer direct questions, are vague with answers they do give, and manipulate conversations to say something they don't. They clearly have an agenda in every thread. That agenda is to show that WSLVT is superior to every other version of Wing Chun and any Ip Man lineage that doesn't do things as they do them is "broken."
So I propose a policy for dealing with them. Everyone could put them on "ignore." But they do occasionally have something interesting to say. So I propose that in any discussion in which they take part and they start asking you pointed questions......before you respond....require that they provide a detailed explanation of how WSLVT does the same thing. This will prevent the long and convoluted threads that aren't very productive.
Again....before you provide any information to or answer questions from Guy B. or LFJ, require them to first describe in good detail how WSLVT views or performs the same topic they are asking about. Do not continue any discussion until they do.
So I propose a policy for dealing with them. Everyone could put them on "ignore." But they do occasionally have something interesting to say. So I propose that in any discussion in which they take part and they start asking you pointed questions......before you respond....require that they provide a detailed explanation of how WSLVT does the same thing. This will prevent the long and convoluted threads that aren't very productive.
Again....before you provide any information to or answer questions from Guy B. or LFJ, require them to first describe in good detail how WSLVT views or performs the same topic they are asking about. Do not continue any discussion until they do.