Ronin Moose said:
To Tgace: You're right; I was all fired up with an immediate response, then I read your reply and realized that some are just not worth the effort. Wish I had taken that advice................
To Kevin Walker: Well, Kevin. since I never worked internal affairs that score would be zero. However, I have a lot of respect for the agents who do work I.A., as long as they are fair in the manner of their investigation. You see, the great majority of us have nothing to fear because we signed on to serve the citizens and help people. Like I said, every job has it's rotten apples. I notice you didn't ask me if I had ever saved a life, stopped a rape in progress or tracked down a fugitve who had killed his entire family, kids included. The answer to those would be YES, but that's just part of the job - something that you could not understand. Believe me, I think everyone should exercise their right to stay safe, but that includes officers as well as the non-officers of the world. Your not-so-subtle hostility towards law enforcement is something that may pass when you grow up, or perhaps after you need one of us "not so bright" types in an emergency. Or, you could just handle it yourself since you're so damn smart.
I am disgusted with myself for even responding to this dribble, but rest assured I won't do it again. In the meantime I'll just keep trying to be as bright and honorable as those who criticize me.
Hi,
I didn't ask you if you ever saved a life, delivered a baby, helped an old lady across the street, etc. etc., simply because you don't have to be a cop to perform those acts of common courtesy.
Exactly what is it that a cop does for society that any other civilian cannot do? What necessary function does a police department serve that a constabulary or a night watch could not equally perform?
The United States has the largest crime rate in the world alongside with the largest police force in the world; how can the two possibly coexist if the police were a deterent to crime? Not only are the police NOT a deterent to crime, they sometimes contribute to it - so, ironically, if you get rid of the police, you will reduce the crime rate.
When police brutality is so frequently documented, videotaped, and shown on national T.V. (and eyewitnessed by pedestrians like myself), with fellow cops standing by watching a cop break the law and not intervening to arrest that particular cop - something is definately wrong. If you pretend the police don't break the law, then you're a liar and a police apologist!
Please read this:
Boston Herald Thursday July 8, 2004
"COST OF POLICING POLICE"
"So this is the ugly truth: It cost [sic] the good taxpayers of this city $107,000 to pay for the police to police the police.
Then the Boston Police Patrolmen's Association threw up its illegal picket around the FleetCenter, the city was obligated to protect those trying to enter the building and to assure access - however limited that turned out to be until a federal judge ordered the picketing disbanded after four days. According to records released by the city at the request of the Herald, that picket line overtime ranged from more than 400 hours on June 8 (at a cost of $14, 738.51) to some 1,200 hours on June 11 (the last day of picketing) at a cost of $44,860.86.
What a hideous waste of resources - a waste o fmoney and a waste of talent and manpower that would be better used to make this community safer, and not just safer from off-duty police."
This is the general consensus of all Boston registered voters: The police are a useless and vile drain on taxpayers resources and the simplest solution to police pollution is simply to get rid of them.
If in your 30 years as a cop and you have never arrested another cop committing a crime, then you're useless as an American and a disgrace to the martial arts!