terryl965 said:
I'm asking what seperates a good to great Olympics Style event. What does a competitor look for in going and what does a instructor look for, so there competitors get the best of both worlds.
Terry
As a competitor, I'm looking to get on the matt in a reasonable amount of time. I mean, I know that's difficult, and waiting is the rule, not the exception, but having an adult weigh in and then not competing until 6:00pm is rediculous. Poor planning.
Enforement of approved equipment only. I went against a guy once wearing 3 layers of leg guards. PALLEEESSSE.
Even matches. Some tourneys (mostly invitationals) will have gaps in competitors ages, weight and experience. Understandable, but a good tourney will offer matches to its competitors and a bad one won't give you an option, resulting in a potentially unsafe match. I was put into such a match when I was a red belt and thrown in with a third degree master. The long and extremely painful beating I took was memorable.
As an instructor, I'm looking at the quality of the judges and referees. Some tourneys are so large, it seems like they're taking extrremely underqualified individuals to fill the spots.
The flow of the event. Good records of who's competing where and when. I've been to tourneys where they can't seem to find anything. An unlisted competitor is the rule instead of the exception. Also, reinforcing who and who isn't allowed into the competition area and when. West Point was far and away the best venue I've ever experienced.
Adequate facilities. Is the event large enough to accomodate the turnout. I know the idea is to make money, but I've been to some where I felt like we were so much cattle. Nowhere to warm up, no where to have lunch, no security, no emergency lanes (or anyone on duty), one bathroom for 1000 people, etc.
That's just off the top of my head. I'll go into greater detail in your What makes up a good tourney thread.