My understanding of this group is that people tend to talk about the things that they do. There is a lot of evidence of that already on here. Martial Arts discussions will easily figure out someone's training just based on their responses. I'm almost willing to say that we as a group are so open about that, that Ai could even figure out who is most likely telling the truth about their martial arts knowledge and who isn't just based on the combination of our responses. If you like I can create a separate post just test this out if you like.So you only think about AI? You don't even train martial arts?
(That's the kind of response I'm referring to, where someone will ONLY see what the post is).
But without Ai it's still easy to tell. Here's why: People who do the same thing tend to talk the same way. It doesn't matter which system they train, they tend to have the same common experiences against common attacks and common defenses. They guy that comes in and says something that doesn't makes sense to that common logic is the guy who isn't doing what he really is saying he's doing.
This is why I can explain long fist techniques accurately and then find an MMA video that shows what I previously explained. The idea that we are so unique that no one has "done it" or "been through it" except for us is not logical. So, from that perspective there should be a lot of "Common Experiences." and anything outside of that common experience is more likely to be a lie than something unique.