After reading through the thread, "False teaching and Secret knowledge" I wondered why WC people can't move away from this superstitious and cult-like mentality and towards a more objective discussion of what we do. Why do we so often adopt the kind of dogmatic and authoritarian stance of "My lineage does it right and the rest of you are wrong!", or even worse, "We have the true/secret/authentic system and the rest don't know squat!". Wouldn't it be a lot more productive to look at our differences more dispassionately and objectively... applying a sort of cost vs. benefit analysis to our techniques and strategies?
Take the issue of stance and steps for example. The way my lineage teaches stance and stepping is different from the way Chinaboxer teaches. Now, I've never met Jin (Chinaboxer) personally, but based on his posts and website, I'd bet we could get together and try out some of the different ways we approach things and learn a lot. I might decide that his approach could help me... or not. But I would base my conclusions on an examination of the benefit of each approach vs. the risk, and how it worked for me as an individual... not because his famous sifu or my famous sifu has more magical secrets!!! Any thoughts?
Take the issue of stance and steps for example. The way my lineage teaches stance and stepping is different from the way Chinaboxer teaches. Now, I've never met Jin (Chinaboxer) personally, but based on his posts and website, I'd bet we could get together and try out some of the different ways we approach things and learn a lot. I might decide that his approach could help me... or not. But I would base my conclusions on an examination of the benefit of each approach vs. the risk, and how it worked for me as an individual... not because his famous sifu or my famous sifu has more magical secrets!!! Any thoughts?