Interesting read!
- Thread starter KPM
- Start date
Bahahaha! 
The floating long pole tip! Reminds one of the fake LT head.
But the real sad part is how he wastes all this energy defending his reputation and still doesn't realize the uselessness of what this spaz taught him.
I guess after years of investment, some people are still more concerned with image for business and ego sake.
The floating long pole tip! Reminds one of the fake LT head.
But the real sad part is how he wastes all this energy defending his reputation and still doesn't realize the uselessness of what this spaz taught him.
I guess after years of investment, some people are still more concerned with image for business and ego sake.
@KPM et al (except LFJ and Guy B who view everybody else's YM-WC/VT that they've ever seen as "broken" 
) I've never met my si-dai Alex in person. I barely know him through mutual friends in the old WT community and, of course, through his videos and other online postings. And we have emailed each other. Anyway, the whole article he posted is pretty unnecessary, so I only skimmed it. The simple truth is that of course he was a close student of LT, and he's a highly qualified instructor, who is very skilled in the WT method.
And, since he is no-longer a member of LT's organization, of course he will be vilified by LT and his cadre of followers ....so what? --He knows his stuff and anybody who was a member of LT's group back in the day also knows that.
I personally trained with LT starting in 1980, did bai-si to him and became a formal disciple back in about '84, and was at that time one of his most senior students. When I left the organization in the 90s, I was similarly forgotten. The difference is that since WC/WT/VT is not my livelihood, ...I don't care. Now I'm free to study with whomever I please, ...to make friends with people from many different branches, and to post freely on forums like this.
Now one thing for the record. In spite of all his shenanigans, LT's WT properly understood is a very advanced system. Like so many others, I may have had differences with the man himself, but I respect his kung fu ...especially the real WT that he taught, not the sometimes silly stuff marketed for mass consumption. He was never one to "break his rice-bowl"!!!
) I've never met my si-dai Alex in person. I barely know him through mutual friends in the old WT community and, of course, through his videos and other online postings. And we have emailed each other. Anyway, the whole article he posted is pretty unnecessary, so I only skimmed it. The simple truth is that of course he was a close student of LT, and he's a highly qualified instructor, who is very skilled in the WT method.And, since he is no-longer a member of LT's organization, of course he will be vilified by LT and his cadre of followers ....so what? --He knows his stuff and anybody who was a member of LT's group back in the day also knows that.
I personally trained with LT starting in 1980, did bai-si to him and became a formal disciple back in about '84, and was at that time one of his most senior students. When I left the organization in the 90s, I was similarly forgotten. The difference is that since WC/WT/VT is not my livelihood, ...I don't care. Now I'm free to study with whomever I please, ...to make friends with people from many different branches, and to post freely on forums like this.
Now one thing for the record. In spite of all his shenanigans, LT's WT properly understood is a very advanced system. Like so many others, I may have had differences with the man himself, but I respect his kung fu ...especially the real WT that he taught, not the sometimes silly stuff marketed for mass consumption. He was never one to "break his rice-bowl"!!!
Last edited:
Interesting words. Does that mean to you that WSL VT, is the biggest starship?
In terms of popularity contents, you ain't a bad of trying to become popular, but by your own stance. Not going to happen, you obviously strive to be notorious IMHO. A little silly to cite popularity as something you don't want, but obviously you do.
I don't understand what you are trying to say in about 70% of what you post Transk. This isn't me being horrible, I just think you get the wrong end of the stick a lot of the time and don't post whatever it is you are trying to say in a very understandable way.
Firstly, the quote was not for you. Don't understand me, join the club lol. I guess lees is more. But of course you won't understand that. Simply because of you're blind faith in less is more.
Predict example, learn to fight to fight more. From my ilk, that is silly, no.
Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say.
Last edited:
Sorry, having real trouble with my spelling at the moment. What I am trying to s ay is there is no perfect answer. Using skills in any fashion have a price, there always is. Less is more, and sometimes less becomes more. A person IMHO, has to know that, otherwise a person may cause more harm. It is very enticing in a encounter to pummel a person, just because you can. Discipline can keep that in check, but if the red mist descends, it is a sticky wicket.
Thought you were a Brit? Isn't this an old British expression from cricket? Heck even a redneck from Arizona knows that....
Sticky wicket - Wikipedia
