Now your talking. I like the board./throat comparison. That may be useful...
See, I've never been one to assume that a board break is a useful indicator of your Conan-the-Barbarian bone-crushing abilities; a number of previous posters have argued, in a way I find fairly convincing, that most bone is a lot harder to break than pine board, particularly well-dried pine board. But I think of breaking as simply a way to
quantify how much force you're able to accurately and effectively direct to a target. It's simply a unit of 'martial force delivery' or whatever (I never
could understand why people found Bruce Lee's observation that boards don't hit back to be the profound refutation of breaking as part of training that many people seem to regard it as—it's also true that free weights don't
lift you back, but lifting both increases muscular strength and provides a
measure of how much strength you've gained since, and as a result of, your previous workouts. Breaking's the same: as you get more technically more proficient, you'll be able to break more boards because your understanding of how and where to strike is better than it was before). And the thing is, you can often do a lot more damage, with a lot less risk, targeting soft tissue rather than bone. So if you take all that improvement in impact delivery that breaking can help you achieve, and apply it to the parts of the other guy's body that no amount of size by itself can protect.... what's not to like?? :EG:
Sukerkin said:
If you're not fighting 'for real' tho', breaking bones and mashing joints is probably not going to be a viable training method

. That's the time when you can begin to learn what
MahaKaal spoke about. Essentially it amounts to removing the opponents ability to
effectively use his strength and mass advantage.
Exactly right, S. Sparring within a rule system poses its own challenges—namely, you have to play by the rules. And that can force you to train things like speed, balance and—this is often neglected—
reaction time to a higher level. I've always thought that reaction time was one of the more neglected aspects of training—people don't always realize that it
can be improved. If you go to a typical science museum, there'll be a test of reaction time somewhere in the building along with a bit about the neuromuscular basis for it, and they keep telling you in the display copy: the more you do this test, the faster you'll find yourself reacting, up to a point. I've tried it and it does work like that. I suspect that MA exercises such as kicking or punching a heavy hanging rope can help with that, as well as with accuracy in eye/hand coordination.