Hi everyone. Interestingly enough, when I was browsing last night I came across this Wikipedia entry. Now of course, take it with a grain of salt, because not everything that you read on the Internet is true...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakama
It says in the article that the hakama in fact weren't meant to disguise footwork. Now of course, none of us were there during those times (but if you were, tell me now so I can get the correct info

) so the debate could go on and on. I know from personal experience that grappling with someone wearing hakama CAN be disorienting as to their foot location... whether or not this was the original intention, I don't know. In the organization in which I train, it's pretty much across the board that the hakama are ankle-length. We wear our obis on the inside, and try to keep a nice, snug fit. I think for most kamae/dachi, a slight bend of the knees is enough to disguise whether or not your tabi are from Adidas or Skechers. But also I think it has a lot to do with weight distribution. If you're in a linear posture, with your weight over your rear leg, then that foot will certainly be hidden while your front foot might peek out a little more from underneath.
On a related note, I heard once that there was once a Shogun who had special hakama made for visitors, with extra, extra, extra long legs so that they couldn't get all crazy. Has anyone seen pictures of these or heard related stories?
Thanks!
Scott Plyler
Jinenkan Baltimore dojo