Enough to gag a maggot

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
Thats all debatable. Maby for a few hundred years there at one point. Which isnt really a major point in the 40,000 odd years of martial arts.
whats debatable, ?
why have you chosen 40,000 years, humans have been around and fighting each other for 200,000 years.. The question is when did fighting become an art, rather than a evolutionary necessity ?
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
whats debatable, ?
why have you chosen 40,000 years, humans have been around and fighting each other for 200,000 years.. The question is when did fighting become an art, rather than a evolutionary necessity ?
Day one. There was always somebody who knew a few things, o_O
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,902
Location
England
But, man, was he pissed. o_O

Yeah my husband has to be that drunk to dance. :D Once though he did a Zulu Warrior on top of one of the tables in the Mess, went to take his sock off, fell off and broke his nose. Dancing can be dangerous.
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
23,423
Reaction score
8,144
whats debatable, ?
why have you chosen 40,000 years, humans have been around and fighting each other for 200,000 years.. The question is when did fighting become an art, rather than a evolutionary necessity ?

Because without looking it up the first recorded depictions of systemised martial arts training is about 50,000 years. So I gave myself 10,000 as a bit of leeway
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
how do you have expected them to rec
Because without looking it up the first recorded depictions of systemised martial arts training is about 50,000 years. So I gave myself 10,000 as a bit of leeway
how do you expect them to have recorded it 200,000 years ago. How are you claiming they recorded it 50,000 year ago
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
how do you have expected them to rec

how do you expect them to have recorded it 200,000 years ago. How are you claiming they recorded it 50,000 year ago
According to some scientist, human beings, as we understand them, somehow, only came into existence, at the 50,000 year mark. Anything before that is not related to homo-sapiens; however, they may have been intelligent Nephlim Cone-heads, but they were not related to homo-sapiens.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
According to some scientist, human beings, as we understand them, somehow, only came into existence, at the 50,000 year mark. Anything before that is not related to homo-sapiens; however, they may have been intelligent Nephlim Cone-heads, but they were not related to homo-sapiens.
which scientist are those, the consensus seems to be 200,000 . And going backwards as they make more finds
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
well yes they are, have you some reputable source for the assertions that humans only appeared 50,000'years ago.
I will look but, you have to understand Europe was not populated by humans, but by humanoids with different behaviors, and hunting patterns. They don't even know if there eyes were round, or in slits. They are gonna find this stuff, and keep finding it, but Homosapien People, you will not find before the 50,000 mark.
 
OP
Balrog

Balrog

Master of Arts
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
482
Location
Houston, TX
They aren't finding humans. Even if you found a live Neanderthal today, he wouldn't be human.
Yeah, he would. Humans are classed as genus HOMO. The earliest found (so far) is Homo habilis, who shows up nearly three million years ago. Through evolution, anatomically modern humans started showing up about 200k years ago and through continuing evolution became Homo sapiens about 50k years ago. There is evidence that H. sapiens encountered H. neanderthalensis repeatedly during the expansion eras, and the presence of Neanderthal genomes in H. sapiens indicates that interbreeding took place. That couldn't happen if Neanderthals weren't human.
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
Yeah, he would. Humans are classed as genus HOMO. The earliest found (so far) is Homo habilis, who shows up nearly three million years ago. Through evolution, anatomically modern humans started showing up about 200k years ago and through continuing evolution became Homo sapiens about 50k years ago. There is evidence that H. sapiens encountered H. neanderthalensis repeatedly during the expansion eras, and the presence of Neanderthal genomes in H. sapiens indicates that interbreeding took place. That couldn't happen if Neanderthals weren't human.
Some believe rape took place, but we were never friends.
 

Touch Of Death

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 6, 2003
Messages
11,610
Reaction score
849
Location
Spokane Valley WA
Yeah, he would. Humans are classed as genus HOMO. The earliest found (so far) is Homo habilis, who shows up nearly three million years ago. Through evolution, anatomically modern humans started showing up about 200k years ago and through continuing evolution became Homo sapiens about 50k years ago. There is evidence that H. sapiens encountered H. neanderthalensis repeatedly during the expansion eras, and the presence of Neanderthal genomes in H. sapiens indicates that interbreeding took place. That couldn't happen if Neanderthals weren't human.
As soon as they started sewing animal stomachs together to make bag pipes, and to carry water for hunting trip, away from the river, you are dealing with homosapiens.
 

jobo

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
9,762
Reaction score
1,514
Location
Manchester UK
As soon as they started sewing animal stomachs together to make bag pipes, and to carry water for hunting trip, away from the river, you are dealing with homosapiens.
I'm pretty sure Neanderthal's made water bottles out of animals they were culturally quite advance. That they didn't make bag pipes shows them to be more advanced
 

Latest Discussions

Top