There is UFC stats on what causes the most stoppages but very generic stats such as submission or strike
Boxing One-two
- Thread starter Acronym
- Start date
There is UFC stats on what causes the most stoppages but very generic stats such as submission or strike
Yeah, I've seen those, but they're not quite what I'm looking for. Plus those stats also don't go into the level of detail that I want.
For me it would be including TKOs as well. And yeah, it'd be a lot of work, which is why I haven't done it. But I know those stats are taken, which means that they should be recorded somewhere, and if they are then you should be able to do some data analysis.
Hence why I replied: "this isn't tennis"
That's unrelated, and I was asking a general statement.
I think sometimes you just like to try arguing with people.
Jobo was the one starting this.
Yeah, but he's freely admitted he enjoys arguing.
To the topic at hand though, I'll give your video a watch tonight. Are you looking for feedback, discussion, have a question about it, or just general sharing?
jobo
Grandmaster
im not sure that tennis takes the time to record by hand the sequeence of strokes leading to a winning shot,
now chess matche always do, which is why their is a data base goibg back to the 1400s
They do. There are statistics for each forehand and backhand winner in each match.
Shot-by-shot stats – Heavy Topspin
Things get more interesting when we look at how these choices affect the likelihood of winning the point. On average, a woman faced with a makeable ball in her backhand corner has a 47.2% chance of winning the point. (For men, it’s 47.7%.) The serve has some effect on the potency those shots toward the backhand corner. If the makeable ball was a service return–presumably weaker than the average groundstroke–the probability of winning the point is 48.2%. If the makeable ball is one shot later, an often-aggressive “serve-plus-one” shot, the chances of fighting back and winning the point are only 46.3%. It’s not a huge difference, but it is a reminder that the context of any given shot can affect these probabilities.
Things get more interesting when we look at how these choices affect the likelihood of winning the point. On average, a woman faced with a makeable ball in her backhand corner has a 47.2% chance of winning the point. (For men, it’s 47.7%.) The serve has some effect on the potency those shots toward the backhand corner. If the makeable ball was a service return–presumably weaker than the average groundstroke–the probability of winning the point is 48.2%. If the makeable ball is one shot later, an often-aggressive “serve-plus-one” shot, the chances of fighting back and winning the point are only 46.3%. It’s not a huge difference, but it is a reminder that the context of any given shot can affect these probabilities.
jobo
Grandmaster
and the shots that preceded it? coz that what your referabcing in boxing
There are no combination shots in tennis.. You don't feint a backhand and then throw a forehand
jobo
Grandmaster
you feint go forward ir back or left or right
you feint hittibg the ball hard and do a drop shot, you feint hitting it down the line and then hitting cross court, you feint do an over head shot and then ket it bounce and yes ove seen people feint a back hand and then hit it with a fore arm
there a lot of feintibg in tenis, and yes there are combination shots in tennis, a serve/ volley for instanc, is a combination, but then so is a serve drop shot,, but then left fight left, so yes combinations
stanly stud
Blue Belt
stanly stud
Blue Belt
not a tennis expert but i have never seen it either..LOL
Similar threads
