Are you justifying that the match of a former K1 male fighter with significant amount of height and weight advantage (not to mention fully protected) against this female fighter is ok since he "held back"?. Also, it is not a question of "if" they were former K1 fighters. The first fighter was a K1 fighter.
As far as the whole "western" eyes thing. After being subjected to it for 18+ years, I am quite familiar with Korean television shows and how they arrange things and I have never known them to done anything of this nature. Yes, they will arrange fun matches between pro-fighters and comedians/actors/singers, but they do it all in fun, not to set up someone like they did here. If you translate some of the reactions on that youtube you will also see that the Koreans were not very happy with what they did either.
If this was all in fun, why not use one of their own native fighters in Japan?
Wow, lets have this conversation again!
"She was knocked down repeatedly, and took the brunt of most of their attacks. And many of her Kicks were varied into pushes, likely due to her predisposed injury.
Like i say, she did very, very well.
I never said they won - It wasnt that kind of competition.
But if it was, youd need the full match in order to count the blows.
She mainly kicked the *** of their theoretical endurance, since they hardly needed to demonstrate their own.
Im not criticising her, or what she did, but i dont see that as much reason to overlook that she was at times overwhelmed.
She got quite a few good blows in, but for every blow she delivered, she recieved another in kind not too far after, often more powerful than her own.
Like i say, i am not defending them.
I am merely viewing this as what it was; A Biased Kickboxing Match.
But though it may be biased, i can still criticise what she does wrong, without saying "But she wasnt wearing protective gear, and her gloves were bigger, so its ok." (I am not implying thats what anyone here said - But im sure at least someone at some point thought it)
Nobody should be taking her side in terms of winning or losing the match, or theirs.
It was a fix, and nothing can be proven in terms of who won or lost either way.
And for K1 Fighters, they werent being too aggressive, compared to a normal Bout.
And for a Kickboxer, her Guard was at times tragic (And im referring to towards the end, not the beginning).
In summary, i am attempting to view this in Retrospect, rather than sliding straight to her side, and declaring her Winner because she lasted out the Rounds.
Unless the aim of the round is to KO your opponent, lasting out the Rounds =/= Winning.
I suspect, however, that you may perhaps be misinterpriting the intentions of what i was originally saying. Hence the increased extradition here. "
And before you reflexively start to talk about her winning in other ways, I Know. This is a conversation that has already happened.
Second Paragraph, i was not supporting them. I was saying that Westerners exaggerate the effect. Not, "Westerers are the only ones who see a problem".
And if it was all fun, a better question is, why not use a foreigner? But would it be much different if they used non-Japanese K1 Fighters, and did the exact same thing? Youd still have to blame Japanese Television. If it was a Japanese Kickboxer, shed still have done the whole Pride and Honor thing, and fought on. Its a matter of retrospective consideration.