As I stated prior, they have control of TKD at the "highest" level and that is for now the Olympic venue. Haven't the slightest idea of how many TKD organizations there are out there, but I'll wager a guess of at least 20. None of them have any real international implications with regards to TKD at the so-called elite level,
Can't say I agree. Or that this is accurate. YMMV given your personal experiences, of course.
OK, your opinion and your entitled to it, but just for discussion sake, if you feel that the Olympic TKD venue is not the "highest" level, then just what would you consider to be the it? Now since one aspect of your rebuttal stems from the other, by you not agreeing, it automatically gives license to being not accurate.
My comment was in regards to your assertion that other TKD orgs "have any real implications with regards to TKD at the so-called elite level." This is simply inaccurate. They might not have implications for hogu fighting, but to say there isn't elite level competition outside the WTF is not accurate. The Poles, the Czecks, the North Koreans, the Argentinians all produce amazing elite level Taekwon-Doin.
I know several world level Taekwon-Do competitors in the ITF
World level in what sense.
In the sense that they have attended WC's consisting of hundred of players from dozens of countries and walked away with gold medlas in sparring which, at that level, is as full contact as WTF sparring and, IMHO, harder since you're dealing with a wider variety of techniques.
If you don't think the Olympics are the pinnacle for TKD, how can an ITF (3 different segments) be considered world level competitor, except within their own realm of the ITF.
This same question can be levelled at WTF competitors. How can the WTF be considered world level competition except within its own realm? It might be a bigger single organization (and it would be even if you considered all 3 ITF's as one), but so what? On balance the majority of Taekwon-Doin in the world don't compete within the WTF confines, I'd warrant.
Now if you are seriously comparing an ITF competitor to an Olympic competitor, I feel your comparing apples to oranges,
And yet your statement about the WTF controlling "Taekwondo" can result in nothing else since you make no distinction about Taekwondo. 1) It simply doesn't control TKD, 2) there are elite level Taekwon-Doin outside the WTF, whether you know about them on a first hand basis or not. If you want to say the WTF is on the verge of taking over Olympic sparring that's one thing. But that's not what you said.
even though that ITF person could be just as good, if not better than the Olympic competitor, the status of the Olympics holds a much higher level acceptance. The term/title "World Champion" has been freely tossed around by many organizations and individuals, but you have never seen anyone openly state "Olympic Champion" if they weren't actually an Olympian.
And yet this has nothing to do with who "controls Taekwondo."
"If you're interested in the actual martial art style of TKD then things tend to get complicated."
I don't see anything complicated about it. Different folks opted to start their own versions of TKD and set up their own resources. Instead of sending the money to Korea, they wished to keep it within their own sphere of control. To me that's simple and that aspect keeps growing. The debate actually comes down to........which is more preferable to the individual - a piece of paper from Korea or one from a home grown entity? Complications ensue when politics become the norm and folks get swept under the rug. Just reviewing some of the other threads here regarding the USAT or Kukkiwon should offer validation on this position.
What complicates it is the fact that the WTF only regulates competitions. They do not (currently) issue rank, set curricula, or do anything else associated with an actual martial art. If you think "controlling TKD" consists in running high level sparring matches (and
maybe considering issuing dan ranks again ... one day) you're welcome to that opinion. It will, I dare say, not effect the majority of people who train in Taekwon-Do.
Apathy about their supposed "authority" will see to it that there's always another option.
There's always "another option", not because of apathy, but because of greed. It's the "I want a piece of the pie also" mentality that fosters the first steps to apathy. So many organizations offering a piece of paper that may or may not be recognized. People in general just give up with all the politics, back stabbing and general BS that is associated within the world of TKD, regardless of what level they may have accomplished in their training.
That is only your opinion. Simply because you think everyone who has another TKD organization is greedy doesn't make it so. Some could, oddly enough, think they are doing the right thing by teaching Taekwon-Do the way they believe it should be taught.
There are people who will be motivated by making a profit (horrors!), who will engage in political bickering, etc. in any human endeavor because of human nature. But you'd have to do a fair bit of demonstration to make your assertion anything but an assertion in any specific case.
Pax,
Chris