Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IIf you look at many TMA's, you have a long period of foundation building and moves hidden within the kata that you might be able to decipher (or hope your instructor can decipher). American Kenpo stripped all of that away and gave you what to do in what situation and you knew exactly how to defend yourself.
I'd hesitate to describe the stripping away of foundation building as a good thing.
The main reasons are, in my opinon,
* SGM Parkers ability to organize, market and develop a system,
* The Tracy Brothers ability to recruit,
* Villari's ability to organize and market,
* SGM Cerio's ability to organize and develop a system.
All of the above mentioned people decided to "get out of the box" in many different ways and it worked for them.
:ultracool
I don't think foundation building was stripped away, but rather foundation building without explanation (i.e. endless hours in a horse stance with no apparent reason). Kenpo was the first art I studied where I was taught WHY from the very beginning.
That is what I meant with it. Not that there was not a foundation to build, but that things were explained and a purpose given. Not do this kata for 5 years and I MIGHT share with you what it means if you are worthy of it.
I get the impression that students get shown their stances, for example, and then very little attention is given to that down the road. If the student hits the stance in a sort-of-recognizable way, then it's seen as good enough.
That's too bad. One of my favorite strikes is attacking with a stance.
Seems to me from what I've read that I could loosely equate the growth of kenpo to the predominance of the IBM-clone.
It was legally possible to reverse engineer IBM technology, so it grew and became everywhere. It was well-marketed and supported by a large amount of software.
Kenpo was also well-marketed and the style was spread across the U.S. relatively quickly. Since it was accessible, it spread more and grew more. Like IBM technology, it was purposefully made accessible and marketed aggressively.
I would even say that TKD had the same type of expansion in the U.S. However, TKD didn't have the marketing and networking skills of Mr. Parker to fan the flames.
Interesting analogy.
I gotta say tho, I don't see the huge growth in kenpo that a lot of people are talking about. Maybe in certain parts of the country, like LA, it's very popular, but I just don't see it elsewhere. I do not see kenpo schools on every street corner. I think TKD is still much much much more popular on that level. Every small town seems to have at least one TKD teacher, but I don't seen kenpo schools everywhere.
Maybe people are talking about an era of growth that happened in the past, and I wasn't there to see it. But currently, I don't see it, certainly now out of proportion to all the other martial arts out there. They've all become much more popular in the last 25 years or so, the industry as a whole has grown tremendously. But I don't see kenpo at the pinnacle of that growth. I just haven't seen it.