what is the real Ving Tsun, Wing Tsun , Wing Chun ?

I’m sorry, but ā€œauthenticā€ meaning what exactly? authentic how?

Authentic is defined as being real, genuine, and true to what it claims to be, rather than a copy, fake, or imitation.

Many wing chun schools are Authentic, just with different lineages
 
I’m sorry, but ā€œauthenticā€ meaning what exactly? authentic how?

Authentic is defined as being real, genuine, and true to what it claims to be, rather than a copy, fake, or imitation.

Many wing chun schools are Authentic, just with different lineages
Is Leung Ting WT authentic?
 
what is the real system?
This is a question/problem typical of combat systems that lack sufficient opportunities for full-contact combat (zero or very few sparring sessions, few or no full-contact competitions). Instead of focusing on developing (based on experience) the necessary combat skills, they waste time speculating about who has the longer...
If I worried about whether my BJJ school was authentic, and my coach was definitely doing everything the way Maeda showed Helio, I probably wouldn't have advanced beyond white belt level to this day.
Combat systems evolve just like all areas of human endeavor. Are today's airplanes not authentic because they barely resemble the Wright brothers' airplane?
 
Is Leung Ting WT authentic?
I am still not sure what you are after here.
Leung Ting was a Student of Ip Man. My teachers lineage goes to Leung Sheung, who was also a student of Ip Man. Ip Man had a lot of students who went on to teach Wing Chun. There are also lineages of Wing Chun that have nothing to do with Ip Man.

Allegedly Ip Man taught them all a little differently. Also I have no doubt that as he got older he taught differently than he taught when he first started.

So, you see, I am not sure what you are looking for as "Authentic"
 
The real one Xue. The real Wing Chun, please stand up.
I don't know...one of these I guess

p19256_p_v8_aa.jpg

MV5BZGY5MzZkOTgtYTJjZC00NzkzLWE2MTItOGM2MjNmOTJiOTcyXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg
 
I am still not sure what you are after here.
Leung Ting was a Student of Ip Man. My teachers lineage goes to Leung Sheung, who was also a student of Ip Man. Ip Man had a lot of students who went on to teach Wing Chun. There are also lineages of Wing Chun that have nothing to do with Ip Man.

Allegedly Ip Man taught them all a little differently. Also I have no doubt that as he got older he taught differently than he taught when he first started.

So, you see, I am not sure what you are looking for as "Authentic"
but was Leung Ting a "closed door student" ?
 
I'll chip in here, probably against my better judgement.
Firstly, the concept of "authenticity" is problematic. Without going into my academic work too much, essentially, what authenticity is depends on what the person asking the question wants to be true. Basically, it's a BS concept that lends something validity based entirely upon subjective expectations and needs.

Authenticity in terms ow Wing Chun?? God knows.

But for me - I do both Yip Man and Sum Nung wing chun.
Yip Man Wing Chun - paired down, accessible, practical and efficient.
Sum Nung Wing Chun - simple but intricately detailed, difficult, practical, murderously effective.

Which one is "Authentic"? Probably both, but I'd also say, probably the Sum Nung stuff.
 
Depends on how you define ā€œstyleā€ and how that fits into your narrative. Leung Ting’s Wing Chun (WT) is different from Ip Chun’s, and the same can be said of almost any of Yip Man’s students.

Differences in expression are common among Yip Man’s students.
But Leung Ting claimed to be a closed door student of Ip Man but...many dispute his claims
 
Back
Top