Repeating forms regularly has a beneficial effect,
Unless a form (assume it contains 50 moves) contains a long combo sequence that the
- 1st move is used to set up the 2nd move,
- 2nd move is use to set up the 3rd move,
- ...
- 49th move is used to set up the 50th move.
which I don't think such single combo sequence form exists on this planet. All MA form contains a set of combos. Since the 1st combo may not have any logical connection to the next combo, if you repeat the
- 1st combo 100 times,
- 2nd combo 100 times,
- ...,
the end result is no different from training your form from the 1st move to the last move 100 times. Those combo sequence is what I would call "drill". Why should we train "drill' and not "form"? Because a combo drill is a logical sequence and the form is not.
If you don't know how to break your form into combos, you may not understand your form well enough. Until the day that you know how to break your form into combos, that form is still belong to your teacher and you haven't owned it yet.
Here is a simple example. Assume your form has 2 sentence,
- This is a book.
- What do I do with a book?
Should a beginner repeat "this is a book" 100 times followed by repeating "What do I do with a book?" 100 times? Or should he repeat "This is a book. What do I do with a book" 100 times? Which learning method is better?
Should a beginner also repeat (now he truly own these sentences):
- This is my book.
- This is not a book.
- This is a pen.
- ...
- What do I do with my book?
- what do I do with your book?
- What do I do with my pen?
- ...
Is this more logical way of learning than just repeating "This is a book. What do I do with a book" when you are 6 years old. One day when you are 80 years old, you still repeat, "This is a book. What do I do with a book?"?