Raging Against Self Defense: A Psychiatrist Examines the Anti-Gun Mentality

Cruentus

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
7,161
Reaction score
130
Location
At an OP in view of your house...
I appreciate the dialog and feed back and contributions from everyone.

Since I personally don't understand the need to carry all the time, I guess my motivation here is really to try and understand what makes people feel this way. It seems the most prevalent answer is simply to be as prepared as possible, in the event it is ever needed. OK, I can accept that. I still don't agree that it is necessary, but at least I can understand where people are coming from. And of course that is just how I personally feel. I never suggested that I wanted to take the right to carry away from others, so long as they follow safe practices, have quality training, and proper permits to do so.

Sorry, I somehow missed this post.

Just wanted to say thanks for your opinion and discussion. Even when not everyone agrees, there can still be an open discussion about things where the goal is understanding of each others point of view. It is very nice when that happends. Thanks again! :)
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
I do see your point. I don't think his claims are dubious, but I do think that he may be over-generalizing, as I have stated before. I think that his assessment may fit for some people, but certainly not all or most people.



This is where our opinions differ.

Objectively speaking, an attack may happen to anyone at any moment, even if it isn't likely. This is a fact, not really a subjective opinion. Some people deal with this fact by increasing their preparedness. This could mean arming oneself with something, taking self-defense courses, and so forth. That is one way of handling it. Some may choose to be armed all of the time because to them it represents freedom and personal responsibility for their own defense and for that of their environment. Others may choose to arm out of paranoia or antisocial behavior; but I don't think it is fair to assume that this is the majority of CCW/CPL holders.

And others may choose not to be armed out of denial, or a victim's mentality, or a lack of personal responsibility. Others may choose not to be armed due to a spiritual ideal and resolve, or simply because it is a hassle and not practical for them.

In all cases, as long as one is willing to be responsible for their choice and not impose it on others, then I cannot say, at least on the surface, that one is flawed for making that personal choice.

So, in the same sense that it wouldn't be fair to judge everyone who chooses to not carry a weapon as being irresponsible or in denial, it wouldn't be fair to judge those who are armed at all times as fearful or paranoid.

Case in point, we can look at Sikhism.

Sikhs, as part of their spiritual beliefs, are armed all the time. Usually it is with an ornate and traditional knife; some are armed with the traditional knife and firearms as well. They are armed at all times, according to their religion.

In Canada, there was some controversy because a high school student wanted to carry his traditional knife in school when he became of age in tradition to do so, but the rules wouldn't allow it. In an interview, his response was interesting. He said [paraphrase], "Our people aren't violent, and the tradition is not a violent one. We carry our traditional armament because in our culture it represents freedom."

You see, in Sikhism, the philosophical belief is that every male (and some females take this option as well) has the responsibility of defending themselves, their families, and their communities. It isn't about paranoia of fear for them; the traditional armament (of which they are bound to use if defense is needed) represents the freedom of defense and the responsibility to do so for them.

Interesting to note that regardless of this ideal, Sikhism is a very peaceful religion. This is especially in comparison to Muslim, Hindu, and Christian histories and beliefs.

I don't think that we can typecast all Sikhs as being fearful or paranoid for their beliefs. Nor, do I think we can typecast the armed citizen in that way either.



And for that, I respect your opinion, even where we differ. :)

Paul


Good points all around. Thanks for taking part!
 

Blotan Hunka

Master Black Belt
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
1,462
Reaction score
20
Odd you should mention Sikhism, I just had a class about it. It is actually a pretty impressive religion and I would be happy to have them as neighbors. Heres a website about them that I was given in this class.

http://www.sikhs.org/khalsa.htm

Very tollerant, hardworking and pious group of people with a strong sense of equality, justice and defense of the oppressed.
 

Latest Discussions

Top