@donald1, hey thanks.. you like helping people, might that include people you don't really know, like I mean outside of your family/friends? What about some one you don't much care for, would you be likely to walk away if you saw that person in trouble that might benefit from your help? Do you think all people like helping other people, or at least have that feeling somewhere in them -maybe in some it is buried more deeply?? What do you think?
@Whitespace, hi, hey so you might intercede on behalf of some one else who seemed incapable of defending their selves, right? I can understand that. Would you act the same in the certainty that you would suffer harm in doing so, or are you calculating the potential risk to your self prior to acting? That is what I mean.. is it a spur of the moment thing or if you jump into some one elses trouble, is it considered or calculated at all?? Thank you
@Bill Mattocks, Well apparently your immortality has not let you down yet!

thank you for your reply.. I am interested why you say it was a mistake to have gotten involved? Was your intention not good? I sense a harshness around your recall of your younger 'foolish' self both for action and inaction and I wonder why so? Perhaps that younger self would have a lesson for the older wiser self to learn? Service in public defence is a noble endeavour though yes? Thank you again
@Rich Parsons, Rich, hey thank you.. Tell me when you acted against bullies, what made you act when you did not know the person being harassed? If it is no matter to you, why would you put your self in harms way over that person or people? Do you think there is some thing innate in people to act like this on behalf of another?? And again, if you knew or suspected de-escalation would fail and you knew or suspected you would not come out of a situation well, do you think your mind to act would differ? or is there some thing primal about acting in such a situation? Thank you x
@oftheherd1, hello! you have made some points I want to ask you about like you can see here there is a pattern here of acting on behalf of those being bullied.. can you explain to me why you might think this view seem prevalent in people?? Is it just among people whom themselves were bullied or some thing else do you think?? And you also like
@Bill Mattocks have been engaged in public defence.. would you tell me if having to perform a duty precludes that duty from being a noble act? And in dealing with the incident involving your wife, you put your self in between and were the potential consequences on your mind at all at that stage? I am happy for your tongue-fu haha.. It is a skill perhaps unlike others that only improve with age

Hey I want to ask you because you have thanked God for your safety.. I want to ask if you intervene on behalf of someone else knowing or suspecting you may suffer the harm oringinally intended for them and you do so for their sake and protection, is that always the right thing to do in a moral sense?
@Xue Sheng, hello XS, putting your self between those you care for and a potential harmful element yes I understand this.. can you say though why would you -why does any one- act this way when the situation involves some one you do not know or even otherwise particularly care about? Like the older gentleman, you care enough to act? Is it a proximity related thing.. were you to have heard about him having fallen on the local news bulletin would he have been just another name? I am interested in how or why we are prompted to act on the behalf of another.. what do you think?? x
@Buka, wisdom eh? the only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing, right

Hey I want to ask since you have been raised up in tough areas.. I feel your pain -harassed for being different nationality and culture!! I hear you my friend! And but then tell me B like if you happen across a person in difficulty have you any obligation to act on their behalf at all, I mean if I could widen it out do we ever have any obligation like morally to help someone to whom we are in a position to offer that help and under what circumstances are you right to withhold that help when it would be in your power to act on their behalf? I mean like how do we even know it is not better to leave them to what is coming.. we all learn hard lessons from hard knocks right? How can we be sure if we weigh in that we are doing the right thing, specially for the person we claim to be intervening on behalf of?? Your thoughts would help me out a lot here and so thank you again for your input x
@GiYu - Todd, hey thank you again! Can you tell me please looking back rationally why you acted instinctively to help others, potentially putting your self in the way of serious and potentially fatal harm like you have done when you could have stood by and watched in safety? Does every one have this innate will to intervene or is it personal perhaps because of your own situation you see things differently?? Yet you are drawing the line at intervening where some one have intentionally put their selves in a compromising situation.. Can I ask you then what is the difference between your gf doing stupid stuff and the pilot in the plane crash? It is not arbitrary drawing the line at her actions having caused the situation? If it were not your gf and but some other girl maybe drunk and being harassed is it different do you think?? I am interested to know why we might act specially when we can get our selves in harm as a consequence or not act in which case the consequence is potentially one of regret maybe?? Thank you my friend x
@JowGaWolf, thank you for replying, yes I see what you are saying that evaluating a situation is most likely to preserve your safety though as you know, if as example a family member fall into a frozen pond, you will not think only you will act instinctively, the certain nature of the harm you will be in is no consideration yes? Is interesting you say you have to 'worry' about safety of your family, you are the protector in a way, yes? I like that.. You would have no thought to put your self between a gun and your children without hesitation yes? It is not a noble thing it is just how it is.. I am a mother I know there is no question.. I am wondering though how far does this instinct go, is it just family and loved ones? Would you be inclined to intervene where you had the capability to, on behalf of another who was not a loved one?? Thank you for your thoughts
@kempodisciple, good to get your input thank you! It resonates how you say about acting without thought for your own safety in the case of accidents yes absolutely.. Can I ask please would you say the chances of you acting reflexively and putting your self in potential harms way for another person depend upon the value of that person to you? I do not mean that as a pointed question, I wonder do we all have the potential will to act thus no matter who the person is or is it quite the opposite and in acting on behalf of another we are, as you have alluded to only acting in our own indirect self-interests? Interested to know what you think x
@Dirty Dog, hey thank you for taking time to reply! Like
@Buka, I am grateful too on behalf of others that you have assisted and continue to.. Your job and hobbies both involve risk and but these acts that undoubtedly save others are not instinct and but are careful processed rapid evaluations.. when I read that it is like you have excised the emotive 'you' or the feeling 'you' out of the evaluative process yes?? You are necessarily calculated in the risks you are taking because your life and the life of others depend entirely on that, this is true? I do not know that is true.. if so would the emotive DD be more apt to act in a more careless or reckless way and endanger himself and potentially others do you think? I am wrestling with some thing like this so your view would help alot thank you x
@Ironbear24, hey, I am grateful for your response.. You raise some interesting points for me.. like you intervened on behalf of that woman and immediately your action, which was done with the most noble intention of helping was shown to you as the wrong one, that must have been hard to take.. I can understand why you changed your mind to not liking to help people.. make sense to me.. And you intervened between your mom and step dad.. whether or not she stayed with him, your action still ensured her safety in that instance.. it is not always a black and white simple issue, as you have shown, thank you. You intervened on behalf of the guy in college being threatened with a knife.. can I ask please why you did this when he was not really your friend, specially since this was not an instinctive thing rather a considered action.. or was it? What made you act and not just leave it and leave the guy to it when it was not your problem? This is what I am interested to know thank you again
