President Bush to Receive Purple Heart Medal

Well it's the chaps right to do that if he so wishes.

But I have to say that the thread title made me oddly irate :o.
 
He should give it to an unemployed vet who had his legs blown off and brain pulped. The poor SOB could pawn it for a mortgage payment.
 
Certainly, Mr. Thomas has the right to do with his medal what he wishes. Although, I do recall that some have questioned the right, or at least the proprietariness of John Kerry, and other soldiers and veterans to do with their medals as he / they wish.

But, should the "Commander-in-Chief" accept the medal?
 
michaeledward said:
But, should the "Commander-in-Chief" accept the medal?
Click to expand...

Exactly. I think he's so desperate to find allies, he'll do anything.

But esp. considering how he managed to dodge any dangerous service activity when he had the chance to serve honarably, I think it's a pretty bad picture if he accepts it.

I think it's a tremendous insult to the real soldiers who are in harm's way.
 
michaeledward said:
Certainly, Mr. Thomas has the right to do with his medal what he wishes. Although, I do recall that some have questioned the right, or at least the proprietariness of John Kerry, and other soldiers and veterans to do with their medals as he / they wish.
Click to expand...

In John Kerry's case the story goes he later admitted they weren't his own medals he threw over the White House gate. Is this accurate?


But, should the "Commander-in-Chief" accept the medal?
Click to expand...

No.
 
Ya remember when you were in kindergarten, and if you had some form of competition, all the kids got a medal for participating, so that nobody got their feelings hurt and started crying...?

my god, I would THINK the president would have grown up at least that much...
 

Attachments

  • $napoleon.jpg
    $napoleon.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 297
crushing said:
Could the President be any more insulting than to refuse such a precious gift and gesture from an injured war veteran?

Well, other than accept the medal?
Click to expand...

Agreed.

This is something of a sore spot for me as last summer following a death in the family and the dispersal of personal effects that entails, I was entrusted with my Uncle Ricky's Purple Heart.

I call him Uncle Ricky because he would have been my uncle, he was killed nine years before I was born outside Cu Chi in 1969( whoever said "What you don't know won't hurt you" obviously never heard of snipers).

That presentation box contains his Purple Heart, the corresponding campaign ribbon to be worn on the Class A dress uniform, his US Army name tape and unit patches from his unit (25th Infantry).

That medal , in that box, on my dresser? That isn't MINE. It's entrusted to me till it's time to pass it on to the next family member.

So when I see them casually bandied about like this when my Uncle gave everything he had for his, you can see why it makes my teeth hurt some.
 
michaeledward said:
Certainly, Mr. Thomas has the right to do with his medal what he wishes. Although, I do recall that some have questioned the right, or at least the proprietariness of John Kerry, and other soldiers and veterans to do with their medals as he / they wish.

But, should the "Commander-in-Chief" accept the medal?
Click to expand...
Yes. I think he should.
I'm not making a judgement call on wether he should have one, but rejecting it would be....I think.....a bad move and impolite to the person who EARNED it and WANTED you to have it.

...aren't there bigger issues than this? This is pretty darn inconsequential isn't it?
I'm not defending the President. I personally am very disapointed with President Bush...
but there's lots of other issues that you could go after him for. What this solidier has chosen to do with his medal Should fly under everyones radar. It should only be important to HIM I'd think.

Your Brother
John
 
Andy Moynihan

As I understand it, you are correct. The medals that John Kerry threw back were not his medals. They were given to him for the purpose of him throwing them back.

Crushing,

You posit an interesting question.

The Purple Heart is given for :
Being wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States or as a result of an act of any such enemy or opposing armed forces
Click to expand...

Were the President to refuse to accept the gift, he would be offending a veteran. By accepting the gift, in the spirit offered; for emotional wounds and scars, is he diminishing the spirit of the award to the other recipients?

And, although Mr. Thomas does not indicate who might have inflicted those emotional wounds and scars, the tenor of the article is that they are inflicted by the President's political adversaries. Is equating the 'loyal opposition' (a traditional term for the other political party in our two party system) with "an enemy of the United States" appropriate?


Brother John,

So far, I don't believe any of my posts in this thread have been an attack on the President. There is no 'go after' involved. I am relaying a news story. My "powder is dry" on this topic.

So far, this news story has involved Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thomas' congressman, Representative John Carter (R-TX), the President of the United States and the Killeen Daily Herald (Killeen, Texas).

As for bigger issues out there ... quite probably. A good source would be the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans for America. I think they have some interesting reporting on emotional and mental health wounds suffered by our troops ... www.iava.org
 
michaeledward said:
Brother John,

So far, I don't believe any of my posts in this thread have been an attack on the President. There is no 'go after' involved. I am relaying a news story. My "powder is dry" on this topic.

So far, this news story has involved Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thomas' congressman, Representative John Carter (R-TX), the President of the United States and the Killeen Daily Herald (Killeen, Texas).

As for bigger issues out there ... quite probably. A good source would be the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans for America. I think they have some interesting reporting on emotional and mental health wounds suffered by our troops ... www.iava.org
Click to expand...
Guess I didn't mean to make it sound like you were 'attacking' really.
It's simply a gracious gesture (the offer of the medal) toward a man that doesn't deserve it. (it's earned for pains/harm in combat serving your country. Pres. Bush hasn't suffered that.)
I think it shows a deep heart on the warriors part though. His intentions seem good.

Have a good one
Your Brother
John
 
I think Bush should get a medal. After all, he awarded George Tenet the Medal of Freedom for screwing up the intelligence leading up to the Iraq War ("It'll be a slam dunk"); to Tommy Franks for screwing up the plans for the Iraq War ("We'll only need 140,000 troops"); and to L. Paul Bremer for screwing up the reconstruction of Iraq. So yes, Bush deserves a medal as much as these guys did.
 
Wow,

I am 70% disabled following my stint in the USMC. Now, I never asked to receive or accept what wasn't deserved. That is all I am going to say about this.

I mean, emotional stress? For what? I am not entirely understanding what this man seems to be thinking. Actually, to give away awards and decorations that one has earned is frowned upon.

Passing down as in a family heirloom is expected, but awarding to someone else? Not valid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

And just how is the Surge going?

Previous Thread

Treatment of sex offenders of all ilks

Next Thread

Similar threads

Bill Mattocks
Should the victims of Fort Hood receive a Purple Heart?
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
MBuzzy
MBuzzy
Bob Hubbard
Bush insults those making the supreme sacrifice.
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Makalakumu
Makalakumu
Bill Mattocks
Hank Slomanski
Replies
1
Views
8K
searcher
searcher

Latest Discussions

Back
Top