Pal Gwe vs. Tae Geuk Poomsae Sell your favorite set

IcemanSK

El Conquistador nim!
MT Mentor
MTS Alumni
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
6,482
Reaction score
181
Location
Los Angeles, CA
As mentioned in another thread, the Pal Gwe poomsae were official poomsae of Kukkiwon for 5 years in the 70's & were replaced by the Tae Geuk poomsae. The Tae Geuk were designed by the same men (with this addition of 3 more men) who designed the Pal Gwe poomsae. Taekwondo folks tend to be polarized as to which we like better. GM Kim Pyung Soo wrote a series of books on the Pal Gwe poomsae in the early 1980's, but they have not been in the Kukkiwon textbooks. There was an "official" DVD of the Pal Gwe poomsae within the past 10 years. But it was quickly replaced by the huge DVD series by KKW on the Tae Geuk & yudanja poomsae. Kukkiwon has said in the last several years that that Pal Gwe poomsae are really not to be practiced any longer.

Those who have practiced both sets, tend to be torn on their favorite. Those who have only practiced one or the other tend to only appreciate their experience.

Here's your chance to sell MT on why you enjoy the set you do. It does no good to rip the set you don't like. Sell, why you like the set that you do. Compare & contrast the 2 sets in your answer, but there's no need to bash the other set. The same gentlemen designed both sets. Out of respect for them, no bashing, please.

When I was a gup student in the early 80's, my master taught us Tae Geuk 1-8 & Pal Gwe 6, 7, & 8. When I learned them, I liked the Pal Gwe better because they didn't all fit the same pattern, & they weren't symmetrical, as the Tae Geuk are. I never saw the lower Pal Gwes until much later in my training. If it were up to me, I'd prefer to do the Pal Gwes.
 

TrueJim

Master Black Belt
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
373
Location
Virginia
"Taegeuk vs. Palgwae....fight!"

So far I know T1-8 and only P1-4. I like them both, I'll vote for Taegeuk:
  • I like the fact that in the Taegeuk forms, the three lines are distinct.
  • In the Taegeuk forms, I can see little hints of where the trigram meaning shows up in the form. For example, it's said that the Tiger Stance in T7 ("Mountain") alludes to the fact that in Korea tigers are associated with mountainous areas.
  • I like the upright stances in the T1-3. It gives you more of a chance to practice changing stances, and more stances to practice with.
  • The increased symmetry of the Taegeuk forms may make them seem a little more boring, but it also makes them feel cleaner. It's better for training too: making sure both sides of your body develop the same muscle memory.
  • So far, it feels to me that the Taegeuk forms build upon one another better as you go through the series.
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,433
Reaction score
9,213
Location
Pueblo West, CO
I practice and teach both, and I am apparently a weirdo because I like them both.
 

dancingalone

Grandmaster
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
5,322
Reaction score
281
I teach the Taegeuk in my TKD school because it is the accepted standard. I do not love them, but at least they are the current thing. The Palgwe lack even that. My feeling is that if you want to practice non-KKW forms while being part of the KKW world, you should look to something like Tai Chi Chuan or learn a couple of the classical karate forms like Naihanchi Shodan, Sanchin, Seiunchin, or Rohai. There is arguably benefit there. Not sure if you could make as strong of a case for the Palgwe.
 

Kinghercules

Blue Belt
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
259
Reaction score
7
Location
Washington DC
I taught both of them because I had worked at a KKW and a ITF schools. I dont like neither one of them. But I had to choose.....I guess the Palgwes. Only because they have that power built in. You can walk thru all the Taegeuks without breaking a sweat but you cant do that with the Palgwes. And damn sure not the Pinans. But the Palgwes are just rearranged Pinans with extra movements and illogical movements. The Taegeuks are......man dont get me started. LOL! Im just not a fan of them both after learning them and had to teach them for a few years.
 

JP3

Master Black Belt
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
701
Location
Houston
This was back in the late 80s and to mid 90s, but the TKD/HKD school I attended and taught at did both sets, and I enjoyed them both for different reasons. In some moods, I liked the symmetry of the Tae Geuk, but when I was feeling cantankerous I felt like the Pal were more fun. As training tools, I ended up liking the Tae Geuk more for fitness and muscle-memory training, as that symmetry forced both sides of the body to keep up. But, for visualization purposes, the Pal were the thing.

My favorites of all were TAEBAEK & PYEONGWON, though, which we did at 3rd and 4th degree. I've no idea which "lineage" theyse originated from, however.
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,433
Reaction score
9,213
Location
Pueblo West, CO
My favorites of all were TAEBAEK & PYEONGWON, though, which we did at 3rd and 4th degree. I've no idea which "lineage" theyse originated from, however.

They're not a part of either form set. They're a part of the yudanja (black belt) forms developed by the Kukkiwon.
 

JP3

Master Black Belt
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
701
Location
Houston
DirtyDog, I get that they are black belt orms, because I was one... but I was young and dumb back then and "just did what I was told," without asking questions about history and such at that time.

I'm curious about "who" came up witht he black belt forms.... the Kukkiwon is both place and organization in my mind, not individuals. Were the same dudes who put together the lower rank forms for either set the guys who put together the black belt forms?
 

TrueJim

Master Black Belt
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
373
Location
Virginia
As I understand it...

In 1965 the Korea Taekwondo Association appointed a committee of representatives from six of the remaining major kwans to develop the forms for what is now called Kukkiwon-style taekwondo. The committee consisted of:
In 1967, this committee introduced the Palgwe and also the Yudanja (Black Belt) forms (including a simpler version of Koryo).

In 1971 two additional kwans joined the committee:
This expanded committee went on to develop the Taegeuk forms, as well as the new version of Koryo. Reasons cited by some sources for replacing the Palgwae forms with the Taegeuk forms are:
  • Doing so gave the two new kwans on the committee some input into the poomsae
  • The floor patterns and movements of the new forms did a better job of representing the I Ching trigrams on which the floor patterns are based
  • The new poomsae emphasized upright stances in the beginner forms, according to some sources so that the beginner would be better prepared sooner for sport-style sparring
 
  • Like
Reactions: JP3
OP
IcemanSK

IcemanSK

El Conquistador nim!
MT Mentor
MTS Alumni
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
6,482
Reaction score
181
Location
Los Angeles, CA
As I understand it...

In 1965 the Korea Taekwondo Association appointed a committee of representatives from six of the remaining major kwans to develop the forms for what is now called Kukkiwon-style taekwondo. The committee consisted of:
In 1967, this committee introduced the Palgwe and also the Yudanja (Black Belt) forms (including a simpler version of Koryo).

In 1971 two additional kwans joined the committee:
This expanded committee went on to develop the Taegeuk forms, as well as the new version of Koryo. Reasons cited by some sources for replacing the Palgwae forms with the Taegeuk forms are:
  • Doing so gave the two new kwans on the committee some input into the poomsae
  • The floor patterns and movements of the new forms did a better job of representing the I Ching trigrams on which the floor patterns are based
  • The new poomsae emphasized upright stances in the beginner forms, according to some sources so that the beginner would be better prepared sooner for sport-style sparring

I noted that you had Hae Man Park & Man Hae Park listed above. More than likely the source that lists Man Hae Park accidentally switched the names. Hae Man Park was the man who helped design both the Tae Geuk & Pal Gwe poomsae. To my knowledge, there is no one named Man Hae Park who was a notable in early days of Taekwondo.
 

JP3

Master Black Belt
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
701
Location
Houston
This sounds horrible, but to transpose the Korean guys' names proper for middle, and vice-versa, seems to happen to us Westerners all the time because of unfamiliarity with the naming structures. Last names, not so much. I imagine that they do likewise with our own (West) "weird-sounding names, to them. I can totally imagine that, especially considering that in some o the cultures they swap the typical order we use, proper then middle then surname, etc.
 

Latest Discussions

Top