Since everyone is suggesting to me to go to a Bujinkan or sub group school and practice the style instead of using books and videos I want to provide everyone with a video from Shidoshi James Miller on using home study courses plus he's a Bujinkan Ninjutsu instructor.
Yeah, I know Jeffery's stuff (it's Jeffery Miller, by the way, not James) Couple of things. 1, he's selling you an online course. 2, listen to what he actually says! The first thing is that there is no substitute for a real teacher. From there, he goes on to say that the training needs to be structured, which is not what you are doing.
Oh, and we're not suggesting that you go to a Bujinkan group, just that if you want to be training in Ninjutsu, you need to go to a Ninjutsu school, and that means Bujinkan, Genbukan, Jinenkan, or a legitimate off-shoot.
Also you can break someone's neck with using a typical choke hold if you apply enough pressure plus if you got enough strength to do so. (Proof at the bottom of the message also don't forget my friend Luis is a professional MMA fighter)
Nope, actually, it shows what I described (even though it's a different choke being applied here). Your proof? That they say that if you apply enough pressure, and then torque the neck, it can break? For one thing, it's no longer a choke then. But really, that show is full of so many holes, including in this demontration, that it really isn't great evidence on your side of things.
Luis may be an MMA fighter, professional or not, but that doesn't mean he knows about Ninjutsu. All it means is that he has experience in MMA. His word is far from authoritative in this regard. Remember, MMA desired outcomes are very different from Ninjutsu desired outcomes, and he is not going to apply a choke the same way we will, so his take is good only for his approach, not ours.
When he meant tamer he showed me that in Ninjitsu or Ninjutsu or whatever the H$%^ people refer to spell it as in Ninjitsu some practitioners believe in applying the rear naked hold while standing behind the person attacking them which can easily get you flipped over.
Okay, it's Ninjutsu. The reason, very simply, is that "jitsu" and "jutsu" are very different words in Japanese, with "jitsu" meaning truth, and "jutsu" meaning practical art. So by using ninjitsu, you are incorrect. There is no preference here, just the correct word. If you really want to learn this art (honestly I'm having my doubts, as you are looking to a number of things as references that are the antithesis of Ninjutsu), let's start by you actually learning how to spell and pronounce the name, okay? This is not something for you to get huffy over, you are using the wrong term, we are correcting you so you can learn, that is all.
Don't know where on earth you got that belief from. We have techniques which include defences against a rear choke which involve throwing the attacker forward, but that is very different from saying we have a belief that you can get easily flipped over. That's like saying we believe that if you throw a punch, you will be easily kicked in Tae Kwon Do...
But in BJJ when you apply the rear naked choke you also apply the body scissors which in his words BJJ is all over the person you're fighting with like an animal.
Okay, I've done my time in a BJJ school, so I'm more than a little experienced in everything you are discussing. The main difference here is one of philosophies; BJJ is geared towards ground fighting, most specifically competitive these days, so going to ground, tying yourself up, going one on one is fine. Ninjutsu on the other hand is geared toward survival, so these tactics are not ideal. It's just too dangerous in a group or street situation. Realise that the BJJ approach is very limited, even if it is strong. Oh, and don't make the mistake of thinking that their approach is the only strong one, believe me, I have plenty of ways of "tweaking" a simple RNC that makes it even nastier than the one you are describing. And that is when standing, so you know.
While Ninjitsu just seeks the quickest and easiest way to finish the fight even if it leaves you open for a really bad counter but not to stay there and beat the guy to death.
Well, for one thing, that would be criminal in most places. And no, we do not consider the fight "finished" if it leaves the opponent open to continue to attack in such a manner. Not really finished there, is it. You're really missing pretty much everything about us, you know. The quickest, easiest way to finish a fight could be many things, it could be simple avoidance, not allowing the assault in the first place, it could be a solid pre-emptive strike, taking the other guy out before he has a chance to attack, it could be a devestating counter, destroying the opponents physical ability to continue, or more. Not sure what you think "finishing the fight" would be if we leave the other guy able to deliver a "really bad counter"...
Also like most broke people I train out of my garage with using mats to protect ourselves when it goes to the ground or when we get thrown. The thing I'm doing is just fighting with my friends or anybody that I can find then after the person beats you all they do is tell you how they beat you and how to prevent the situation from happening again or teaches you how to escape the situation based on their experience.
Fine. But that is not learning a martial art, and it certainly is not learning, training, or studying Ninjutsu. You are fixated on techniques, without understanding where the art actually begins. Either learn under an instructor, or recognise that you are not studying an art. Do you see the difference?
Which is why I'm not a style bashing a$$#@&$ I value input from all sources from other martial artists in my proximity and if they know more than the both of us fighting then they can help us out as well.
Well, when it comes to martial arts, I would suggest that I know quite a bit more than you, as do many others here. We have a great deal of experience in many arts, including the one you are asking about. But you really do need to listen to what we are saying, otherwise this entire exercise has very little point.
I appreciate financial hardship, but that should only reinforce to you the realities of your situation. If you are not in a position to learn from an instructor, you are not in a position to learn. But if you really want it, you will find a way. If you are bale to afford a computer, an internet connection, a monthly online subscription, videos, books, then I submit that you can scrape up enough to visit a school as well. It's usually not as expensive as you may think.