Thank you all so very very much for such wonderful positive testimonies.
I think I am a little perturbed to have to call it brave and because to suggest it is brave or requires courage to explain to someone something that we do that brings us happiness (and is free for all) seems counterintuitive. Nevertheless, I think in context of stating one's faith in public can surely be described as brave. I am very grateful to have your contributions.
I am Christian in a Pentecostal tradition having come from an Orthodox Catholic background stemming back to where I am originally from. I have good relationships with very moderate Muslim friends. I feel it is part of my faith to respect the beliefs and faiths of others.
Faith in a Religion, in terms of its benefit to Your Life, is similar to the determination of a people at War, in Defense of Their Livelyhood. Belief can be a strong influence, in and of that it gives some people determination, where They otherwise wouldnt.
Yes, I understand this analogy, thank you. And have you given this analogy in the third person for a reason? It is your personal faith I am interested in

I think you are correct, we cannot know anything for sure except what our faith has proven to us

And since you have not explicitly stated your faith, would I assume you are reticent for the aforementioned reasons? Or have I misinterpreted what you have written? I do appreciate your contribution and I am interested in hearing if you are so minded to share. Thank you.
I have no problem with agnostics, and not much of a problem with atheists; I even agree with them on many things, including that the real facts are unknown and probably unknowable, that faith is just not enough for some people and that's OK, and so on. However, a (to me) distressing number of so-called atheists are actually either anti-religion or anti-Christian (some are more specifically anti-Catholic). It's not just that they do not believe, they want and actively work to denigrate, demean, and insult people of faith. They want religion expunged from the world, they see it as evil, dangerous, and the root of all evil. They have set themselves up not just to be anti-religion for themselves, but to destroy my faith and even make it illegal for me to practice as I wish, including voting for laws that fit my concepts of how society should function. As I said, I have no problems with atheists per se; but I have a huge problem with people who set themselves up to be my enemy because I am Catholic. If they choose that path, then I will oblige them. People who set out to destroy religion should not be surprised to find I don't stand around and take it passively.
I would wholly agree with this. I understand the idea of religious contention which encourages some to hide their faith. I think perhaps I am naive to suggest that the religion of another is a threat to my own any more than atheism bears that threat. I am interested in discussion. I am interested in diversity. I am also wondering if the reason that many Christian faiths have a feeling of erosion from so many quarters) is partly because the Christian voice is so often quiet? What do you think? Is Christianity culpable for its own erosion because it values tolerance and a certain appeasement in the face of violence or the threat of violence? Thank you very much for sharing so generously.
I think different people have different reasons. But I suspect some may have had people talk to them who became confrontational, or arrogant, or otherwise try to demand as opposed to trying to persuade. I think some fear talking about it because they want to put off discussing it in the hope they can delay the inevitable. Others have a faith of their own, but may not know how to defend it, and fear being made to look foolish, or inclined to change something they don't want to change.
Yes I think these reasons are perfectly understandable. I think the apparent requirement to defend one's faith against a metric that is not faith-based (or even that IS faith-based in a conversation like this) is certainly one of the reasons for such reticence. I would say that not everyone is a competent orator or debater and but for me, the only argument I need is.. Because that is what I believe. I do not need to have it proven. I am not blind to evidence which others perceive as refutation. Still, my faith is my faith and needs for me no justification beyond what I feel. I wish I could instil that in everyone that had faith and but was self-conscious in any of the many ways when it came to sharing.
I think the idea of preaching inappropriately to those not willing to hear it is also at times foremost in the minds of people with a faith. And I guess the global drive to proselytise is also offputting to some. I think it is a shame that faiths compete with each other and that atheism further competes with those faiths also. Is there a theoretical compromise to be had do you think? Or will the strongest eventually defeat the weakest?
I'm Buhdhist. I grew up in a Methodist family, but had trouble reconciling some of the church beliefs with my personal beliefs. I don't have a problem with anyone's faith or religion. The only times I do have issue is when someone wants to denigrate what I believe or use thier own faith as an excuse for hate.
Religion is a very powerful and in some cases private thing. No one wants to be ridiculed for thier beliefs. Nor do they normally want to be seen as the loud mouth telling everyone else what to believe. It is much easier just to remain quiet.
I very much appreciate your sharing. Thank you! Can I ask please why you think there is this derision or utilisation of the beliefs that someone has as a weapon against them? Why is there derision when most if not all faiths have peace at their truest core?
And do you feel there is a positive way to share your faith without falling into either of those categories - subject of ridicule / loudmouth preacher? Thank you again.
Thanks for giving me an oppurtunity to speak about my faith.
Thank you for what you have shared. I wonder can I ask please why do you think some are ridiculed for their faith? Are some faiths (or is lack of faith) more "credible" and less apt to ridicule do you think? And if so, why is that?
I have no religious faith. You'll forgive me if I don't pile on about how awful the scornful atheists are, when everyone from my family to society at large look down on me for it. You're 90-95% of the population, a handful of loudmouth scornful atheists won't harm you.
I don't like to share in my public life for the most part, until I know and trust the person very well, because of the potential consequences. My wife just doesn't get that. She will casually tell brand new acquaintances that I am an atheist, and then gets upset with me when I ask her not to. I just never know how someone is going to react, and what negative consequences it can have. I'm fortunate in my choice of profession and location that religious intolerance is rarely an issue.
As for why, I just don't have the belief. And I have no reason to have the belief. By neither internal conviction nor evidence. You do? Cool, I have no problem with that. Nearly everyone I care for and love is a theist. But that doesn't somehow make their beliefs rational or defensible. But neither does it make them a bad person. I've found that people who are bad twist their religion along with it, and good people do good things with their religion. I doubt that religion can make one good or bad - although it does subject good people to unnecessary pain.
Thank you for outlining your position. I am grateful to have your opinion, I am sure I have said before, for me personally having whatever variant of faith or being atheist I would hope in an ideal world was no barrier to open discussion. I appreciate though that in the real world, as you have eloquently explained, often never the twain shall meet. Can I ask please do you think this antipathy is a reflection of a deliberate desire to remain ignorant? Do you think theism is a threat to atheism (or rationality in a wider sense maybe)? Do you think atheism is a threat to faith? Thank you again for taking time to post.
So that wish to see removed that quirk of evolution that makes some of us believe in the supernatural is a rather fruitless one. I've noted before that it is possible that this tendency to sanctification is tied to the same abilities that make us able to create, fantacise and plan for the future; so, on reflection, getting rid of it might not be such a great idea for the species.
I appreciate you posting here Suke. I wonder if you would mind me asking you a question? I understand your antipathy for the notions held tight in religion and faith in deities and but I wonder you seem to be speaking in a very much first person narrative as if you have been in direct conflict with persons or bodies which gave rise to that antipathy. Is this the case? I think it is one thing to disagree with religious concepts using a metric of science, I have heard a deal of secondary anger also expressed within these kinds of discussions (the notable public face of atheism: Dawkins though not so much Hitchens before his passing) and was wondering if that was a reflection of frustration with religion and perceived religious impingements or is it based upon personal direct conflict? I would be interested in your own experience. Thank you again for posting your thoughts.
With all due respect the answers given by a couple of posters is the reason many of us don't care to 'share' our faith or religion. I understand that people are happy with their faith but what I don't understand is their need to tell us about it and try to convert us who aren't of their faith. I'm happy with what I am, it's my life but I understand perfectly why it's not for everyone and never in a million years would I feel the need to 'spread' or share what I believe with anyone else. I understand totally why Empty Hands wants to keep his thoughts to himself. I don't think anyone not of a specific faith needs to be saved and I take umbrage I'm afraid when people want to 'share' their religious beliefs with me and 'save me' I find that insulting. Atheists, agnostics, pagans, whatever, everyone is fine by me, to each their own and I really wish it would stay that way. I really really don't want people praying for me, kind though the intention may be, it's arrogant all the same. I do sometimes have moments of amusements when certain Christians try to convert me to their religion from mine which was the same as their Jesus'. If their messiah came back today do you think he would go to a church or a shul to pray? As he was a rebbe I'm betting he'd make straight for the shul.
I'm sorry if people think that's confrontational but the OP asked why we wouldn't like to 'share', it's simply I think that many of us don't feel a need to do this modern thing of 'sharing'. My shift partner is a Hindu and likewise as an 'old' religion I don't think they have this need to 'share' either, I've found that most people are happy with what they believe in so should be left alone.
I am sorry that you are having an experience where someone has tried to coerce you into listening to what you are not interested in. I can only say that is not something I would do intentionally. In this thread, I am seeking to share with whomever of whichever faith, or lack of, seeks to share in discussion likewise. If someone is not interested then that is perfectly fine. It is not for me to be intrusive. I hope you are not offended by me asking what I have asked in this thread? I would be interested in hearing about what your personal faith brings to you and but I appreciate that you may not be inclined and I am grateful nevertheless for you having taken the time to outline your thoughts, thank you.