The father of one of the suspects told WSB-TV Channel 2 Action News his son denies any rape happened.
"Word had got back to her parents what she did and she changed her story around and said she was raped," said Brandon LeBlanc. "That's when they took her to the hospital and get rape kit and that's why they interrogating all these boys on these charges."
Interpretation, definition. Four kids doing something naughty and they get caught because someone else told on them. One of the boys denies "forcing her" and the girl uses her sex and seemingly defenselessness (3 against one) and says she was raped to make her less of a willing participant?. It's all down to interpretation and definition. How they see it then I'm guessing. I dunno, the police and courts will have to settle the matter on the legal level.
Back at home is another matter altogether. What's going on that kids THIS young are knowledgeable enough to perperate these acts?
Ceicei may have got it right that the boys may themselves been victims of sexual abuse and are "acting out". Remember that sexual abuse does not always include physical violation/contact, it could be exposure (intentional or not) to inappropriate material for their ages. Same with the girl in this matter. The subject came up at a slumber party, oh sure talk of boys is the norm for girls around that age but (unless I'm mistaken... never attended an 11 yr. old's slumber party... not about to either) sex would be an "EWWWWW" subject rather than something of interest... but then again how would I know?
Either way it happened and as Steel Tiger & Terry mentioned question remains is who's to blame?
IMO for something like this it would have to be damned near everybody... including the kids. The kids get their share of the responsibility for
doing the act although it should be fair to say they were most likely not
fully aware of
all the consequences, just that it was something "naughty/nasty/cool/fun" to do, and that they'd get in trouble if they got caught.
The parents get their share for (as mentioned) not providing adequate supervision and by that I mean supervising what their kids are exposed to on a daily basis. No parent can or wants to watch their child 24/7, but they can and should monitor their day to day activities by communication during "down time"... over dinner or before bed or when-ever. No third degree interrogation under a bare bulb in a darkened room with dad silhouetted in shadow standing by the open door holding his belt loosely while being hooked up to a lie detector.

rolled eyes: )
But open honest communication free of fear or reprisals about what their day went and un-detailed touches of what their child and their friends talked about. Maybe the kids would not have said ANYTHING about it but a smart parent might've caught something inappropriate somewhere down the line.
Either way if, there were better parenting then perhaps this could've been avoided... perhaps not. There are no guarantees when it comes to raising children according to a Masters and Johnson's study I've read.
The media? Responsible? Well in some regards yes.
Yes parents should monitor what their children are exposed to via TV/internet/radio/games/etc. but again those producing said shows need to realize that their material can get into the young's minds. I rarely watch commercialized television these days because I just can't believe the stuff that is on there. Oh sure there are some excellent shows out there to be had but it's WHEN those shows are presented. Games now have age-appropriate warnings on them... but how many actually pay attention to them or how many times has a parent thought "...ehh, that's not TOO bad for my kid... they've seen worse..."
Andy might be correct that we may move into such a totaltarian society that one must get a license to conceive a child... almost like China but for different reasons.
So
who is to blame? What can we do to prevent more stories like this from cropping up in the near/distant future?