Close quarter bo sparring strategy

Christopher Adamchek

Purple Belt
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
355
Reaction score
167
Location
CT
Prime example of close quarter bo strategy

Block, strike, strip, jam, kick, range, strike
(Slow mo)

 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,257
Reaction score
4,967
Location
San Francisco
Both people are taking a middle grip on the bo, yet spend a lot of time outside of that range. At times it’s seems like they are reaching for each other.

Are you in the video?
 
OP
Christopher Adamchek

Christopher Adamchek

Purple Belt
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
355
Reaction score
167
Location
CT
Happens with all weapons floating out of range, and when you think of mid grip you only have 2ft to work with.

Im on the right.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,257
Reaction score
4,967
Location
San Francisco
Happens with all weapons floating out of range, and when you think of mid grip you only have 2ft to work with.

Im on the right.
Yeah, the truth of the matter is that when real engagement happens, bones get broken. So there is a real, and necessary, separation between actual use, and drills or sparring. Safety requires it.
 

Monkey Turned Wolf

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
12,289
Reaction score
6,401
Location
New York
Prime example of close quarter bo strategy

Block, strike, strip, jam, kick, range, strike
(Slow mo)

What is the purpose in mid grip versus outer grip I've spent some time sparring friends (with training), and what we've discovered is holding the end of the bo seems to be much more effective than holding the middle, if the other person has a bo as well. Hae you noticed/been able to use any advantages holding the middle in actual sparring sessions?
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,029
Reaction score
10,597
Location
Hendersonville, NC
What is the purpose in mid grip versus outer grip I've spent some time sparring friends (with training), and what we've discovered is holding the end of the bo seems to be much more effective than holding the middle, if the other person has a bo as well. Hae you noticed/been able to use any advantages holding the middle in actual sparring sessions?
From my meager experience, mid-grip is faster in transition and blocking, and gives you quick access to both ends, so you're attacking with both hands. Outer grip gives you range and adds power to big moves. I teach sliding between them as needed, and would be more likely to use the outer grip at that distance, unless I can close to jam (like a transition from striking distance to clinch).
 

Monkey Turned Wolf

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
12,289
Reaction score
6,401
Location
New York
From my meager experience, mid-grip is faster in transition and blocking, and gives you quick access to both ends, so you're attacking with both hands. Outer grip gives you range and adds power to big moves. I teach sliding between them as needed, and would be more likely to use the outer grip at that distance, unless I can close to jam (like a transition from striking distance to clinch).
From what I've experienced, just holding onto outer grip gives you the range, and the flexibility from midgrip can't overcome that. This is something where I've seriously tried and practiced midgrip since I prefer it, but just could not win over outergrip. I would need either video proof or personal experience of someone beating me to trust in midgrip, even as a transition phrase.
 
OP
Christopher Adamchek

Christopher Adamchek

Purple Belt
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
355
Reaction score
167
Location
CT
So most arts that use staff, use outer grip with transitions to mid grip.
"Traditional" okinawan bo techniques use almost entirely mid grip.

Outer grip gives you much greater range, good transitions, but limits strikes. You have a forehand, back hand, and thrust.

Mid-grip gives you a serious lack a range but everything is quicker. You have a forehand, back hand, and thrust on both ends real quick, as well as a center block/strike. 7 vs 3

Personally i usually float a lot between the two but mid-grip is really useful and helps your reaction. I can do a video of outer grip vs mid-grip
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
30,029
Reaction score
10,597
Location
Hendersonville, NC
From what I've experienced, just holding onto outer grip gives you the range, and the flexibility from midgrip can't overcome that. This is something where I've seriously tried and practiced midgrip since I prefer it, but just could not win over outergrip. I would need either video proof or personal experience of someone beating me to trust in midgrip, even as a transition phrase.
I agree that in staff vs. staff there's a distinct advantage to outer grip. Mid grip is for closer work. Since I'm training to use against either a weapon (could be knife, stick, baseball bat, etc.) or empty hand, the ability to change those distances becomes important. Against another staff or similar weapon, I'd change to mid grip when I lose the distance for outer grip (someone gets closer because I failed to control distance) or if I make an entry to cut off their ranged attack (if someone was better than me at outer grip distance, for instance).

But honestly, if someone is good at staff work and has a staff, I'm probably in trouble no matter what grip I'm using. :hurting:
 

Anarax

Master Black Belt
Joined
Aug 16, 2017
Messages
1,022
Reaction score
377
Location
New Mexico
There are inherent advantages and disadvantages on weapon grips. Yes, outer grip has a range/power advantage, but mid grip has a speed/versatility advantage. The situation, training methodology and our experiences will cause us to favor one grip over the other. However, both are viable grips.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,257
Reaction score
4,967
Location
San Francisco
I favor the single-end grip, but with the ability to switch from one end to the other. But that is the bulk of my experience. I find it to be both quick and powerful. It does require more space, however.
 

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,118
Reaction score
4,565
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
I like to hold on the 1/3 and 2/3 spots. This way not only I can strike with both ends.

If I let go my

- left hand, I can strike toward my right with 2/3 length of the stick.
- right hand, I can strike toward my left with 2/3 length of the stick.
 
OP
Christopher Adamchek

Christopher Adamchek

Purple Belt
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
355
Reaction score
167
Location
CT
Both grips can be advantageous against each other with experience. When using the mid grip, one i use a lot of forward pressure and two i can move faster. Here i use both against the other and a quick snippet of floating between the two as i normally would.

 

isshinryuronin

Master of Arts
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
2,097
"Traditional" okinawan bo techniques use almost entirely mid grip
True traditional Okinawan karate is designed for close-in fighting. Seizing and grappling and short range strikes are the rule. Bo can also be very effective short range when held in thirds. Offensive capability is superior due to speedy combinations and power transmitted from the techniques with the bo for disarming and locking similar to empty hand fighting. Holding the bo at the end increases range and most useful for defense and keeping the opponent at a distance, although if the opponent slips thru the defense he will be in a great position to wreak havoc on the inside.
 

isshinryuronin

Master of Arts
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
2,097
Mistyped correction: ..."speedy combinations and power transmitted from the body. It also allows for techniques with the bo for..."
 

Latest Discussions

Top