Britney Spears admits it.....

[ArmorOfGod]

As most of you know, over the past few weeks, Britney Spears has been photographed getting out of limos wearing no underwear on 3 seperate occasions. She was in the limos with Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan 2 of the times, the other time was at a gas station.

The first time, people said she was wearing flesh colored panties, the second time people were shocked, the third time everyone just hung their heads in shame.

Remember when actresses showed cleavage to get attention? The cleavage got more and more defenite as the years went on. Then Paris Hilton went pantiless many times for the camera hogs at parties, then Lindsey Lohan went pantiless getting out of limos three or four times over the past several months.

Is this even remotely acceptable? I wish I had so much money that I could just forget to exist in normal society.

Anyway, here is Britney Spears' admission: www.britneyspears.com

I wonder if this will help her custody case? I wonder what she is thinking to let people convince her this is a normal way to get attention?

AoG

 

[shesulsa]

I think whether or not someone wears underwear is their personal preference. What these girls need to learn is how to get in and out of a limosine without flashing their babymakers to everyone.

 

[ArmorOfGod]

I agree, but most feel that it was a publicity stunt since the two girls she was with have been doing it often over the past several months.

 

[MA-Caver]

I think whether or not someone wears underwear is their personal preference. What these girls need to learn is how to get in and out of a limosine without flashing their babymakers to everyone.

Exactly, there's a fine line between exhibitionism and lewdness. There isn't much of one but it's there.
Maybe these women get a thrill doing it, and I guess that's okay because to each their own, however; they also need to know when it's "safe" to do so. In a large crowd you can't guarantee that there aren't kids/minors milling about. Particularly in Lohan's and Spear's case where they're admired by the younger generation. Maybe they won't catch it but kids/minors are notorious for having quick, sharp eyes and not missing much. In some states it's (VERY) illegal to show a minor one's privates, even "accidently". True, these girls aren't being blatantly obvious like "hey! LOOK over here!" but they know they're being closely watched (and photographed), and assuredly they know that their "babymakers" (and nipple slips) can be seen.
As pretty as they are... they're lacking in the common-sense dept. and that's sad. It's also a commentary on the declining of morality.

 

[shesulsa]

I agree, but most feel that it was a publicity stunt since the two girls she was with have been doing it often over the past several months.

Or, she could just be coming into a new time in her life and got some advice from friends. Or, maybe the three of them were getting down in the back of the limo and wanted easy access and y'all are jealous. :lol2:

These girls have been acting tactlessly since ... um ... forever ... and this is what actors do ... act tactlessly. Yes, it can forward their carreers, but really, I think they just do it because they "can" and just don't think anymore.

It seems to me that many young celebrity women seem to think their "sexual freedom" indicates the need to display all that they are whenever they feel like it unapologetically. It's how they feel good about themselves. Hopefully, they'll find a better way someday.

 

[Rich Parsons]

I think whether or not someone wears underwear is their personal preference. What these girls need to learn is how to get in and out of a limosine without flashing their babymakers to everyone.

If a woman chooses to not wear under garments then so be it. If a woman chooses to wear under garments then so be it. Yet, there are ways to get into and out of a vehicle with a short skirt and long dress. I know from observation that walking in real short skirts is like walking in a long tight dress, the knees stay together or very near each other. This allows for movement with out falling down or exposing oneself. (* Also note that if you place one foot in front of the other in a straight line this will cause more hip motion. Versus the guy style walk of placing your feet in a stance about hip width. The former being attractive, the later being comfortable and capable of movement and balance. *)

 

[SFC JeffJ]

I really don't think it's much of an issue. If they don't want to wear undergarments fine. If they want to show the world their various body parts, fine. Tactless? Yes. Wrong? Nope.

Jeff

 

[Lisa]

To each their own. Sometimes, I wish some people would keep their own to themselves but...I digress.

 

[Drac]

What these girls need to learn is how to get in and out of a limosine without flashing their babymakers to everyone.

I think its a lost art..

 

[Jade Tigress]

I think whether or not someone wears underwear is their personal preference. What these girls need to learn is how to get in and out of a limosine without flashing their babymakers to everyone.

:lfao:

I couldn't have said it better.

 

[ArmorOfGod]

If they want to show the world their various body parts, fine. Tactless? Yes. Wrong? Nope.

Jeff

I disagree. If I or you were to do it, we would be arrested.
One of the times that Brandine (Britney) went pantiless, she was wearing a skirt so short that her butt cheeks were hanging out. The cameras there got a lot of pics.
Would you walk around showing your private areas carelessly? Probably not, since you would be concerned about children being nearby.
But like I just said, if a man were to do it, there would be police and an arrest, but if it is a celeb female, they can do what they want since they are above the law.

AoG

 

[shesulsa]

Would you walk around showing your private areas carelessly? Probably not, since you would be concerned about children being nearby.

Indeed. I would think a woman with children would think about this ... but then her children are not yet old enough to publicly scream something like, "MOMMY! I can see that woman's 'gina!!!"

But like I just said, if a man were to do it, there would be police and an arrest, but if it is a celeb female, they can do what they want since they are above the law.

Do you think it's really their celeb status, or could it be the omnisexual and celebrated objectification of women?

I think it's both.

 

[MA-Caver]

Indeed. I would think a woman with children would think about this ... but then her children are not yet old enough to publicly scream something like, "MOMMY! I can see that woman's 'gina!!!"

:lfao:

Do you think it's really their celeb status, or could it be the omnisexual and celebrated objectification of women?

I think it's both.

I was just thinking about that... would these women even try to complain about being turned into sex objects whilst flashing their bodies for all the world to see (via Papparazi) ... I'd dare say they're being hypocrites. Same as like with Beyonce (a few years ago) who wore a dress that basically had daisies covering up her nipples like pasties. Was she objectified? Or did she do it herself... knowing full well the effects of such an outfit?
What about those who walk around in "painted" outfits? Are they nude? Some artists do it so well that it's hard to tell. But they are, so are they objectified?
It seems like a matter of opinion. How someone looks at something like that and bases their decision is up to them. Kinda like the argument of art and porn.
But these women aren't doing it for arts sake. So why are they doing it? How someone looks at it is going to vary. It's the intent that makes all the difference in the world.

 

[arnisador]

I think whether or not someone wears underwear is their personal preference.

Indeed!

What these girls need to learn is how to get in and out of a limosine without flashing their babymakers to everyone.

See, I was with you at first, but then you lost me.

 

[dubljay]

See, I was with you at first, but then you lost me.

:rofl::rofl:

 

[shesulsa]

See, I was with you at first, but then you lost me.

:lfao:

If I flashed *insert shortened term for large-incisored, wood-carving mammal here*, would you follow then? :wink:

Any bets on the answer folks? iratedan

 

[MA-Caver]

:lfao:

If I flashed *insert shortened term for large-incisored, wood-carving mammal here*, would you follow then? :wink:

Any bets on the answer folks? iratedan

Uhh, isn't that an old trucker's CB term for a woman? Ahhh 10-4 good buddy!

 

[shesulsa]

I was just thinking about that... would these women even try to complain about being turned into sex objects whilst flashing their bodies for all the world to see (via Papparazi) ... I'd dare say they're being hypocrites. Same as like with Beyonce (a few years ago) who wore a dress that basically had daisies covering up her nipples like pasties. Was she objectified? Or did she do it herself... knowing full well the effects of such an outfit?
What about those who walk around in "painted" outfits? Are they nude? Some artists do it so well that it's hard to tell. But they are, so are they objectified?
It seems like a matter of opinion. How someone looks at something like that and bases their decision is up to them. Kinda like the argument of art and porn.
But these women aren't doing it for arts sake. So why are they doing it? How someone looks at it is going to vary. It's the intent that makes all the difference in the world.

I don't disagree. I wonder, however, what makes these women think they have to do this, and hence other women feel the need to compete with this? And then, when they begin to sag and wrinkle (as do we all), complain that their fellas wanna look at those pretty young things flashing *insert shortened term for large-incisored, wood-carving mammal here* and wearing daisies for outfits. *sigh*

Whatever.

Sometimes I wonder if the brain looked like what's on the other end if it would be half as sexy.

 

[Drac]

Uhh, isn't that an old trucker's CB term for a woman? Ahhh 10-4 good buddy!

That's a BIG 10-4 good buddy...

 

[Makalakumu]

I don't disagree. I wonder, however, what makes these women think they have to do this, and hence other women feel the need to compete with this? And then, when they begin to sag and wrinkle (as do we all), complain that their fellas wanna look at those pretty young things flashing *insert shortened term for large-incisored, wood-carving mammal here* and wearing daisies for outfits. *sigh*

Of course there is a dark side to the open society...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2652593869015040601&q=Topless+Commercial&hl=en