Juany118
Senior Master
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
- Messages
- 3,107
- Reaction score
- 1,053
You mean juany who so far has said i have never fought with a belt kit on. Or with disorienting conditions. Or under stress. Or with use of force. And has obviously no idea what my job contained. But will invent stuff anyway?
I would cry like an emo and tell them they don't understand me.
Or as I have always done try to explain in a manner that does not rely on me being amazing and more a logical process.
Ahh look, simple proof that you cherry pick, or simply do not read. I acknowledged that you fought with a baton and cuffs on your belt. That is not the same as fighting with the kit of a patrol officer where they will have 3-4 weapons, not including the baton, on the FRONT or side of their belt, all accessible to a suspect.
Also in so far as use of force you don't know what a US Police Officer has to be able to articulate in terms of use of force. As was illustrated in a post above that noted case law we have to address. Then you have Act 1983 where an officer can be sued for civil rights violations under the 4th Amendment (among others). I have invented nothing regarding your experience. I have even said those techniques may work for your purposes but that does not mean they work for LE, at least in the US. All I have pointed out is that your argument is based on two things...
1. I think the realities of US Police work are stupid. Since I believe those realities are stupid it's stupid to design tactics to account for them.
2. Because MMA is the end all be all, and these techniques work for my purposes, ergo they must work for all purposes, even those I have no experience with.
3. Even if someone has experience I lack, they don't know what they are talking about.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk