Master Jay,
My Isshinryu background came from Tom Lewis (then Salisbury Md now on a ranch in Wyoming) and I’ve been doing it for 35 years. BTW I studied TSD with Frank Trajonawizc in Scranton for several years, Chinese arts with Ernest Rothrock for 30 years and Shotokan and Indonesian studies with Tristan Sutrisno for over 10 years.
My Isshinryu history was first training under Mr. Lewis (a former Marine) and then under one of his students Charles Murray (USAF) who also trained under Shimabuku Tatsuo.Then I’ve been teaching youth for free for 30 years and a small group of adults for 22 years. My model was pre 1900 intimate instruction which we follow to this day. I also trained a bit with the late Sherman Harrill and picked up roughly 800 applications from the 8 Isshiryu kata, a small piece of his studies.
I’ve studied Yang Tai Chi from Ernest Rothrock for about 30 years, and as he got really into eagle claw (which he teaches today) He shared his Wu Tai Chi studies with me. I’m primarily a Yang stylist. BTW his ex-wife Cynthia Rothrock was a TSD student of Frank Trojanowicz too. Small world.
I find Shotokan’s Secret, written by Sensei Bruce D. Clayton, more a case of special pleading (supporting Itosu and Shotokan’s development versus Kyan’s) simply because he should have focused on the systems that remained closer to Kyan’s teachings. Isshinryu’s founder Shimabuku Tatsuo definitely moved the paradigm with Isshinryu. He should have looked at Seibukan, Shorinjiryu and even Matsubayshi ryu as other Kyan derivative systems, for I feel they are closer to Kyan’s original intent. Which is not to slight his contributions in Isshirnyu, but the differences IMO mean that he could have chosen better to try and make a case.
I’m afraid I don’t agree one system’s approach is better than anothers. I’ve trained with too many good people that find very different ways to make their study work, the initial secret, decades of sweat equity.
Some Seisan versions to look at are attached below. All of these version follow the Okinawan standard (IMO) is that the paradigm changes each generation/instructor moves on. All of them are effective, abet differently.
Naha-te tradition (descended from Hiagonna K.)
Toon Ryu Seisan – not available on the net
Morio Higaonna
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjddaBWugLs&mode=related&search=
Ryuei-ryu Seisan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTtRyNjA2eY&mode=related&search=
Seisan Shito Ryu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouVbKOI1gQo&mode=related&search=
Uechi tradition – imported to Okinawan about 1948
Kanei Uechi - Seisan Kata
Several Shorin exmaples
Shobayashi Shorin-ryu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUznJJnMenE&mode=related&search=
Seibukan Seisan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFSnV7s_5i0&mode=related&search=
And humbly I’ll include my version of Isshinryu again
Isshinryu Seisan – Bushi No Te Isshinryu
Nakazato Joen's Shorinji-ryu kata has Seisan as the 2nd or 3rd kata
http://shao.sakura.ne.jp/kata.htm
Itosu’s descendents –
Old Hangetsu shotokan
JKA Kata Hangetsu
Hirokazu Kanazawa – Hangetsu
BTW Egami’s turn from the JKA with the Shotokai went much further into stances and movement dynamics than the JKA uses.
Hangetsu (Shotokai)
Hangetsu
Maître Shigeru Egami (Shotokai)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ad6bdqsFG5M&mode=related&search=
BTW my own analysis is that all of the Okinawan Seisan kata likely came from one kata. While Shorin, Goju and Uechi are vastly different, they share a core embusen, pattern, of a forward section, a turn, a forward pattern to the reversse and section and an ‘+’ pattern. The rest may well be variation and embellishments on the original theme.
Of course it’s just my analysis, which does not constitute proof, but I feel there is a logical case for it.
Pleasantly,