Martial Arts Aren't Magic

Discussion in 'General Martial Arts Talk' started by Anarax, Dec 8, 2017.

Tags:
  1. hoshin1600

    hoshin1600 Senior Master

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    1,283
    Trophy Points:
    253
    It is interesting to me that you say the Japanese have faith in their system. Generally in the US we dont. Many view the government and law enforcement as the enemy.
    I think the concept of violence anxiety is a symptom of the bigger issue of self reliance. In the west we have the pressures of being self reliant, somthing I believe is not prevalent in Japan.
    Being self reliant means the responsibility of self preservation and self protection falls on the individual. In the US we see ourselves as individuals, I think ( let me know if I am incorrect) in Japan they see themselves as part of a group. Is it possible that group identity is stronger than individual identity? This could make a big difference on how martial arts manifests itself in different cultures.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Paul_D

    Paul_D Master Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    England
    I’m suggesting he best way to deal with multiple opponents is to train to deal with multiple opponents, as opposed to not training to deal with them and then having no understanding, no training and no skills to deal with it if it happens.
     
  3. Paul_D

    Paul_D Master Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    England
    He wasn’t unable, he said he couldn’t be bothered to argue with you. If it’s something you’ll never understand he’s just banging his head against a brick wall.
     
  4. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,072
    Likes Received:
    859
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    well if your not suggesting different training would have given a different out come, then you can't really say the training he did have let him down.

    outside the world of the,kung fu movies, 7 opoinent is always going to end up with you being a bit beaten up, unless they are 12 yo girls, even then.?
     
  5. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,072
    Likes Received:
    859
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    they always say that if they have been pulled on talk tosh,
     
  6. Paul_D

    Paul_D Master Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    England
    I’m suggesting the best way to prepare for multiple opponents is to train for multiple opponents, rather than not training for multiple opponents and then having no training no understanding and no skills to deal with multiple opponents.
     
  7. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,072
    Likes Received:
    859
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    but that's a completely different point, than the one were you said that. Guys training had failed. But even then there arnt any skills that will allow you to fight 7 opponents, so he would still have been beaten up.

    its like saying someone whose rope broke when absailing should have trained free falling, it wouldn't have made the slightest differance to the out come
     
  8. Danny T

    Danny T Senior Master

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,014
    Likes Received:
    2,091
    Trophy Points:
    388
    Location:
    New Iberia, Louisiana USA
    5 maybe 6 years back a group of UFC fighters were involved in a training program with the U.S. Marines where they were either attacked by 2 man teams of Marines or they attacked the marines. Most of the attacks had the fighters with more numbers than that of the marines with the fighters losing almost every encounter even when they had the upper hand with surprise as well as numbers. That said the marines had the advantage of home territory (being outside in the rough terrain and snow), having trained as two man teams with weapons vs 4 or 6 man teams. All encounters were hand to hand with and without weapons.
    Training vs multiple opponents is different than fighting a single person. The overall strategies are different and some important tactics are different. The idea of engagement is different, when to engage and how is different.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  9. Hyoho

    Hyoho Black Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    58
    True because Japanese are Japanese. Nationality bonds them together. In some ways so much that its completely over the top with company taking preference to a family unit. Then when they do become individualistic they split and form yet another group.

    It can actually be a group conciousness that exceeds race and nationality 'if' you belong to that group and are in Japan.

    Losing face is very bad in Asia, so not just the individual but the whole group loses face.

    Individuality is taking something that others can do then adding ones own character to it. For others to sit wtch and admire what you have added rather than changed.

    Politically a leader takes few descisions. They confer with party and sempai. In the past a prime example of leadership gone wrong.

    My study over many years has been one of cultural activity. I find it sad that many more dont look at MA is this way.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  10. JP3

    JP3 Master Black Belt

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2015
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    632
    Trophy Points:
    303
    Location:
    Houston
    In a word, Why?

    Why "should" she do that? If her outcome values what you are talking about, perhaps. I'd agree with you, myself, but I can't, and neither can you, substitute your own judgment for hers as it applies to her child, unless you are going to go that far into authoritarian paternalism (being everyone's dad).

    Typical martial arts types seem to have different value structures than typical non-MA types. Maybe, to her, all that build up of skill is a gross waste of her child's time and energy, to get something he/she will never use. I'd disagree with her, but I can definitely see where she has the right to make that determination.
     
  11. hoshin1600

    hoshin1600 Senior Master

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    1,283
    Trophy Points:
    253
    i am very interested in this idea. can you elaborate on this?
     
  12. Anarax

    Anarax 2nd Black Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    890
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    New Mexico
    It's an opportunity that will otherwise be wasted. In your example the mother has already enrolled her child in the class. The only thing the child must do to gain so much more is apply him or herself. The child will gain valuable self defense skills if she simply encourages him or her. Both children and adults place too much value on belt ranks. Both children and adults have this mentality of "I am a (insert rank) belt, thus I can defend myself." Giving those with very little to no combative skills the idea that they know how to fight/defend themselves is a recipe for disaster. Confidence is great, but confidence in that which you are not good at is dangerous.

    Why would the mother not want their child to be able to defend themselves?

    Don't know where you got that from? I stated the same for adults. I've witnessed this numerous times and have never forced by beliefs on anyone.

    My post was never about depriving someone of their rights. It's about both children and adults can get so much more out of martial arts if they apply themselves. Coasting through training isn't going to help them if they get into an altercation.
     
  13. Anarax

    Anarax 2nd Black Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2017
    Messages:
    890
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    New Mexico
    No it isn't, you're generalizing and painting with a broad brush. You are essentially saying this one example you found that the supports the claim you already believed shows that anyone who doesn't train how to fight multiple opponents will not be able to defend themselves against multiple opponents.

    I can take your logic and find someone who does train against multiple opponents and loses against multiple opponents. I can then say, see? training against multiple opponents is ineffective. It doesn't make sense.
     
  14. Paul_D

    Paul_D Master Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    England
    Which is exactly what you did with your initial post.

    Everydays a school day ;)
     
  15. Paul_D

    Paul_D Master Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    England
    Correct, there are no skills that will allow you to follow to fight 7 people when you are unconscious, because you have never trained for multiple opponents and so don’t look at what is going on around you, and get blindsided. Where as of course the best way to deal with multiple opponents is to only train against one opponent so all you have ever done is focus solely on them at the exclusion of his mates coming at you from behind. Yes that’s a much better idea, I mean what can that possibly go wrong...

    It’s not even close to saying that.
     
  16. gpseymour

    gpseymour MT Moderator Staff Member

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    21,923
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    Trophy Points:
    448
    Location:
    Hendersonville, NC
    In my experience, the proportion of students who put in minimal effort AND expect to be great is very small. There are, indeed, many students who just do the work in class, no more and no less. Most are quite happy with their progress, or lack thereof. They like the community of the school, the physical activity, and being able to call themselves martial artists. Those who are dissatisfied with their progress tend to work harder.
     
  17. gpseymour

    gpseymour MT Moderator Staff Member

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    21,923
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    Trophy Points:
    448
    Location:
    Hendersonville, NC
    Agreed. In most cases, if the MA instructor is doing good work (not even necessarily considering fighting ability), the kid it likely better off. They're getting socialization, maybe some team work experience, learning to take direction, developing some physical ability, probably developing some discipline. The kind of stuff that many children get from other sports. If the instructor isn't doing good work, there's some bad that can come from being in a MA school.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. gpseymour

    gpseymour MT Moderator Staff Member

    • Supporting Member
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    21,923
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    Trophy Points:
    448
    Location:
    Hendersonville, NC
    I don't know of any realistic approach that makes 7-1 not overwhelming odds, without a great deal of luck, other than getting shots off before they get close enough to do damage, so maybe they stop attacking and start running for their lives.
     
  19. JR 137

    JR 137 Senior Master

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    4,870
    Likes Received:
    2,944
    Trophy Points:
    403
    Location:
    In the dojo
    The point that ANYONE, no matter who he is and how accomplished a MAist he is, got beaten by 7 guys at the same time is SO STUPID that it genuinely deserves zero consideration and rebuttal.
     
  20. oftheherd1

    oftheherd1 Senior Master

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    785
    Trophy Points:
    263
    If you are taking about professional fighters getting into fights outside the ring against groups of 5 people, I would like to know the circumstances and outcome vs TMA fighters who do the same, then factor in TMA who may not have had training defending against boxers and also believe in fighting fair. Are professional fighters or TMA practitioners fighting against groups of drunken thug wannbees or experienced street fighters?

    But regardless, your assertion that training to fight against more than one attacker would not make you better at that, is frankly, quite ridiculous. That can be expanded to say that no training will help anyone to fight better. TMA, newer MA, boxing, nothing. So either you can fight or not. No training will help you. Do you support that?

    If you want to argue the odds of any fighter, TMA or otherwise, winning against 2 attackers, or 3, or 4, 7 or 10, that would make more sense. But there are so many possible variables I think it would be very difficult.
     

Share This Page