What's wrong with the .380?

OP
T

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon
You might like the 102 grain Remington Golden Saber, then. This is probably going to have the deepest penetration out of all of the .380 ACP hollowpoints, and it's one of the heaviest bullets used in this caliber.

That sounds like a promising round. I went looking for a jacketed semi-wadcutter (jacketed, with a flat, lead nose -- sort of a hunting round), like for my .357, and the guy at the sporting goods store was completely lost. But I do remember seeing the Golden saber there.
 
OP
T

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon
A 380 is really a 9mm short much like the 40 is a 10mm short. A 380 silver tip or it's equiveilent, is not a bad round for simple self defense. This round is not a man stopper but it is good at delivering pain into a armed attacker. Most people who are initally shot do not know what type of round that has hit them and how much damage it has done. Because of the severe trama many who are hit by a potentional man stopper do not feel it's effects untill later on.
If you use a 380 silvertip or its equiveilent for S.D. it should deliver enough pain into an armed attacker to allow you enought time to regroup and evaluate.
There is little chance that this little round will over penetrate and come out the other side. This is a plus in a croweded area. It is a very loud round, it will scare the hell out of people. It is a good pocket gun.
For a pocket gun I prefer the S&W Chief Special Airweight,(alloy), 38 sp. plus P.
A 25 cal tends to pencil hole into a substance with very little shock and / or pain.

That's exactly my thinking, as well. I'm not expecting to knock a man down with this thing -- but a gun is still a gun. Even with a .45 it still boils down to shot placement.
 

searcher

Senior Master
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Messages
3,317
Reaction score
59
Location
Kansas
That's exactly my thinking, as well. I'm not expecting to knock a man down with this thing -- but a gun is still a gun. Even with a .45 it still boils down to shot placement.


That is exactly why my CCH instructor says that you should not stop shooting until the threat is stopped.

Unless you shoot the guy in the medula oblongata, the guy can still function for 15-30 seconds after he is fatally wounded. He can be dead and still be able to harm you.
 

chinto

Senior Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
38
So how reliable are .380s?

It sounds like the best pocket pistols still jam. What's the deal?

Is it the concept of the pocket pistol in general? Is it the .380 specifically?

I have a chance to pick up a Grendel .380 for pretty cheap, and I have some time to think about it. Out of 100 shells, it jammed 5 times. I thought that was horrible, but then, I normally shoot a Glock, which has never jammed.

Then with some of the reviews on the "new .380's" out there, it sound like they all have jamming problems, and the 9mm mouse guns don't seem to be all that much better.

The things I like about the Grendel are the double-stack mag, which makes for a comfortable grip, and the double-action-only, which is always a plus for me in a self-defense situation. But a 5% jam rate? To me, being raised on wheel guns and Glocks, that's nuts.

What's so hard about a small autoloader?

well you have less velocity and there for less energy in the same 9mm diameter slug then in a 9MM parabelum/luger cartridge.
in that .380 caliber, I have had very good function from a Walther PPK, and an old colt pocket pistol... but really its the very smallest I would go in a pistol for self defense given a choice.. if no choice I would go as low as a .32 acp (7.65mm) but you in my opinion should never go smaller then that! also do as the people in Delta force, and the S.A.S and G.S.G.9 and other elite forces do with 9mm caliber weapons, and always shoot at least 2 times in the "double tap". With the .32 caliber, I would suggest a minimum of 2 double taps together.
 

Jack Meower

Blue Belt
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
283
Reaction score
2
Location
Columbus, OH
I have had a Walther .380 PPK/S for about 20 years now. Mine is stainless, and the Interarms version. I do not carry, but I have shot it frequently. It seemed to jam quite a bit for the first 100 rounds or so. I don't know if it just needed to be 'shot in' or if I was 'limp-wristing' it (probably a combination of both), but since then it has been perfectly reliable. It is also shockingly accurate for such a small pistol, and it points amazingly well.

I don't have a problem with a .380 as a self defense round myself. I do prefer FMJ rounds in it due to potential issues with lack of penetration, especially with heavy winter clothing. Besides, FMJ is cheaper and feeds better. As others have mentioned, shot placement is key.

We always want high power, high capacity, small size, reliability, accuracy in the same gun. A person just has to decide what is the best compromise for them, as there is no perfect firearm. Also, do not disregard how it feels in your hand.

Best of luck in your search.
 

chinto

Senior Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
38
So how reliable are .380s?

It sounds like the best pocket pistols still jam. What's the deal?

Is it the concept of the pocket pistol in general? Is it the .380 specifically?

I have a chance to pick up a Grendel .380 for pretty cheap, and I have some time to think about it. Out of 100 shells, it jammed 5 times. I thought that was horrible, but then, I normally shoot a Glock, which has never jammed.

Then with some of the reviews on the "new .380's" out there, it sound like they all have jamming problems, and the 9mm mouse guns don't seem to be all that much better.

The things I like about the Grendel are the double-stack mag, which makes for a comfortable grip, and the double-action-only, which is always a plus for me in a self-defense situation. But a 5% jam rate? To me, being raised on wheel guns and Glocks, that's nuts.

What's so hard about a small autoloader?
the biggest problem I have with the weapon is the cartridge is to week and to small a bore diameter. in a pistol the most important thing is bore diameter. .380 cal/ 9mm kurtz is better then say a .32acp/7.65mm but not a huge amount. If you can hold the weapon and shoot it go for the biggest bore diameter you can! personally I prefer the .45 ACP and if I have to go smaller, I would not go below 9MM parabellum ever!
no pistol is going to have the velocity of a rifle, so bore diameter is what is going to get the job done. I am an ex medic and can tell you that if some one is shot with a pistol the only thing the medics need to know is the bore diameter, larger the bore the worse off the patient is!!!!!!
 
OP
T

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon
the biggest problem I have with the weapon is the cartridge is to week and to small a bore diameter. in a pistol the most important thing is bore diameter. .380 cal/ 9mm kurtz is better then say a .32acp/7.65mm but not a huge amount. If you can hold the weapon and shoot it go for the biggest bore diameter you can! personally I prefer the .45 ACP and if I have to go smaller, I would not go below 9MM parabellum ever!
no pistol is going to have the velocity of a rifle, so bore diameter is what is going to get the job done. I am an ex medic and can tell you that if some one is shot with a pistol the only thing the medics need to know is the bore diameter, larger the bore the worse off the patient is!!!!!!

Um, what about the .357 Magnum? It's the same diameter as a .380 or a 9mm. It just has a lot more punch behind it, and a heavier bullet. There's got to be more to it than just the diameter of the bullet.
 

Grenadier

Sr. Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
10,826
Reaction score
617
Combination of things, really.

Bore diameter does have a good bit of importance, since a 0.40" hole in someone is going to have more of an effect than a 0.355" hole.

However, what the bullet does once it's inside the target, has just as much, and probably more, importance. Bullet design is a critical aspect here, since today's premium hollowpoints have pretty much levelled the playing field, when it comes to cartridges of .38 Special +P, and anything more potent.

With today's premium designs, any of the serious defensive calibers will do the job, since such bullets are designed to expand at lower velocities than their older counterparts used to require. If anything, the developments in bullet designs have changed the way we think about ammo. Old "dirty words," such as "147 grain 9 mm hollowpoint," are no longer dirty, and some of the best performing designs are of the 147 grain subsonic 9 mm type (Federal's HST, Winchester's Ranger, Remington's Golden Saber, etc).


But... What happens when you're not using one of the above "serious defensive" calibers? If you're confident in being able to place your shots very accurately and consistently, then you're already way beyond most folks, and don't need advice on this matter. However, for the rest of us ordinary folks, we need to evaluate the gun, and ask if we're willing to sacrifice the extra margin of error when it comes to the better defensive calibers, just to have better portability.

With today's small firearms (Airweight J-frame revolvers, Kahr micro series, Rohrbaugh, Kel-Tec, etc), available in such serious defensive calibers, I simply prefer to stick with them. I find it hard to beat my Glock 26, stoked with 13 rounds of Winchester Ranger ammo (127 grain +P+), and that the ammo still has enough velocity to match a .357 magnum coming out of a snub nosed revolver.

In cases where I have to keep the gun concealed with a tucked shirt, and no overgarmets, that's where I'll use the S&W 342 (airweight), loaded with 5 rounds of Speer's 130 grain Gold Dot +P loads designed for shorter barrels.

The only lesser caliber that I carried was a .380 ACP (Sig P230), where i chose the heaviest premium hollowpoint available, that fed reliably (The Remington Golden Saber 102 grain), since penetration from a .380 ACP is going to be marginal.
 

INDYFIGHTER

Purple Belt
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
312
Reaction score
4
Location
Indianapolis, In
I've said it before and I'll say it again. I love my Kel-tec .380!!! Simple, fits in my pocket, lightweight and so far it's worked everytime I've pulled the trigger.
 

wade

Black Belt
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
695
Reaction score
19
Location
Saint Helens Oregon
Indy got it right the first time, "it fits in the pocket". You can have all the hand cannons in the world carrying 13 or more rounds that can punch through reinforced brick walls but if you can't carry it because of the size it's about as effective as, well, gee, not having it at all. IMHO, I would rather carry something that I can have with me every single day and every where I go no matter what I am wearing than something I have to dress for and decide whether it is appropriate or not. I get up, I get dressed, I check the magazine and the chamber, put it in my pocket and am ready to go. Don't have to think about what to wear or how I'm going to hide it cause the weather is 110 degrees and that damn coat or vest is going to look really strange at the beach. I have a 40 and and a 45 and love both of them dearly. Fun to shoot, make loud sounds and big holes. But they are both big and not easy to hide so very very rarely do I actually carry them. Funny thing, I've been out of the military since 1977 and been carrying all that time and I have never been in a gun battle. Makes you wonder doesn't it? Anyhoo, for all you that carry hand cannon, other than in war and for LEO's, how many of you have actually had to use your hand cannon in an actually situation?
 
OP
T

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon
I've said it before and I'll say it again. I love my Kel-tec .380!!! Simple, fits in my pocket, lightweight and so far it's worked everytime I've pulled the trigger.

Indy got it right the first time, "it fits in the pocket". You can have all the hand cannons in the world carrying 13 or more rounds that can punch through reinforced brick walls but if you can't carry it because of the size it's about as effective as, well, gee, not having it at all. IMHO, I would rather carry something that I can have with me every single day and every where I go no matter what I am wearing than something I have to dress for and decide whether it is appropriate or not. I get up, I get dressed, I check the magazine and the chamber, put it in my pocket and am ready to go. Don't have to think about what to wear or how I'm going to hide it cause the weather is 110 degrees and that damn coat or vest is going to look really strange at the beach. I have a 40 and and a 45 and love both of them dearly. Fun to shoot, make loud sounds and big holes. But they are both big and not easy to hide so very very rarely do I actually carry them. Funny thing, I've been out of the military since 1977 and been carrying all that time and I have never been in a gun battle. Makes you wonder doesn't it? Anyhoo, for all you that carry hand cannon, other than in war and for LEO's, how many of you have actually had to use your hand cannon in an actually situation?

Which pocket do you carry it in?
 
OP
T

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon

Well, if you carry it in the front pocket, isn't that a little obvious? But, the mouseguns I've seen aren't easy do draw from the back pocket, unless you're using a pocket holster, but then the gun doesn't fit all the way into the pocket.
 

wade

Black Belt
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
695
Reaction score
19
Location
Saint Helens Oregon
Mine does, and in a holster. How tight are your pants?

Mouse guns? You shoot mice? Ewwwwwww......... Or do you mean guns that mice can carry? Hmmmmmmmm.
 

INDYFIGHTER

Purple Belt
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
312
Reaction score
4
Location
Indianapolis, In
Which pocket do you carry it in?

I can carry it in the front pocket of my jeans, I can carry it in my back pocket if I'm not going to be sitting down. I also carry it in the front hand pockets of all my jackets. My biker coat has a leather pocket on the left inside that I use to lug my 9mm around in, I forget my .380 is even in there.
 

Grenadier

Sr. Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
10,826
Reaction score
617
Well, if you carry it in the front pocket, isn't that a little obvious?


Not really. You do, though, have to be a bit careful about your wardrobe.

During the hot summer months, a S&W airweight J-frame or Kel Tec P3AT, can fit in a decent quality pocket holster. If the holster is any good, then it will conceal the bulge using a flat profile, and if a bulge is seen, then people will generally assume that someone's carrying a wallet or a phone in the front pocket.

If someone tries to take a detailed stare (and it will take the educated eye some time to determine for certain), you can always call the staring person a pervert, and that will stop them from staring. :)

A looser fitting pair of cargo shorts works well in these cases, as does a pair of looser fitting slacks / khaki's that have deeper pockets.

Something like these fine Mitch Rosen holsters are great for pocket carry:

http://www.mitchrosen.com/product_line/holsters/pocket_holsters/body_pocket_holsters.html

or even the cheaper "El Raton"

http://www.mitchrosen.com/product_line/holsters/express_line/body_express_line.html

Dare I even say, that I've even been comfortable using the cheap Desantis Nemesis...
 
OP
T

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon
That makes sense.

The "Pocket holsters" I had seen were basically IWB holsters, so the handle stuck up above the clip. Now I see where the "hooks" catch in your pocket and hold the holster in place. That looks very doable.

I can also see how the holster would flatten out the rectangular shape, and "contour" in to the leg, so it wouldn't look so bulky.

Going into summer, often I wear hawaiian-style shirts untucked, so IWB works just fine, but there's no option for if I want to go a little nicer and tuck in the shirt, without wearing a jacket. I think I could make this work with the Khaki's and slacks I usually wear.
 

chinto

Senior Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
38
Um, what about the .357 Magnum? It's the same diameter as a .380 or a 9mm. It just has a lot more punch behind it, and a heavier bullet. There's got to be more to it than just the diameter of the bullet.


I can tell you now that as an ex EMT that I would rather have some one who is hit say 2 or 3 times by a 357 then 1 or 2 times by a .45 ( depending on the wound sight of course as a head hit or hit to say the heart or inferior or superior aorta is kinda moot. )

bore diamiter is the major factor.! in a rifle or other weapon that can put a round down range at over 1900fps things can start to change and at over 2700 fps things do change a lot!

but in a 357/9mm kurtz or parubelum the extra velocity mainly translates into penetration... a .25 acp has been stopped by heavy winter clothing at times.... but heavier slugs and larger bore diameter are what it is about... 158 grains at say 850 fps beats 115 grains at 700 fps every day, and still beats it at 850 fps.. but its the bore diameter that makes the huge difference in a pistols velocity. the bigger and with that size comes weight the more damage and larger the wound channel.
 

Grenadier

Sr. Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
10,826
Reaction score
617
I can tell you now that as an ex EMT that I would rather have some one who is hit say 2 or 3 times by a 357 then 1 or 2 times by a .45 ( depending on the wound sight of course as a head hit or hit to say the heart or inferior or superior aorta is kinda moot. )

bore diamiter is the major factor.! in a rifle or other weapon that can put a round down range at over 1900fps things can start to change and at over 2700 fps things do change a lot!

True, that bigger can be better, if we're talking about ball ammo. After all, a .357 magnum will make a hole about 0.357" wide, and will probably make an exit hole of similar size, while a .45 ACP will do the same with a 0.451" diameter hole.

However, with today's jacketed hollowpoint ammunition, the playing field has been equalized. Take a look at Winchetser's ballistic's:

http://winchester.com/lawenforcement/testing/testing_pg.aspx

Not much difference at all between a 9 mm and a .40.

Also, look at the Ranger T series:

http://winchester.com/lawenforcement/testing/testing_t.aspx

Not much of a difference between 9 mm / .40 / .45 ACP.

Similar premium ammunition from any of the major manufacturers (Remington, Speer, Federal, Hornady) should perform similarly, too.
 

Latest Discussions

Top