Weight training: one set or three?

OP
R

RyuShiKan

Guest
Originally posted by Elfan
I would be *VERY* cautious with advice from a site that has "Legal Mail Order Steroid Suppliers" and "The Steroid Bible."

:rolleyes:
Ok Einstein, after your in depth look at the workouts on the website mentioned what are your expert recommendations for improving them?
 

Kalicombat

Green Belt
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
168
Reaction score
3
Location
Sinton, Texas
Kirk,
The "one set workout" is based on HIT training or High Intensity Training. IT was popularized by two pro bodybuilders whom peaked in the late 70's and early 80's. Sad to say, they were the Mentzer brothers, Mike Mentzer being the most notable and most successful as far as bodybuilding goes. They both died, in their late 40's within the last year or so. A result of the enormous amounts of anabolic steroids they partook of in their carrers.

HIT training was also popularized by Nautilus. The Nautilus principal was one set per excercise, between 8 and 12 reps, 4 seconds on the lowering of the weight, and 2 seconds on the actual lifting of the weights. This technique was thought to stimulate more muscle growth and is also known as negative accentuated training. In terms of strength training, the technique is flawed becuase one does not care how much weight they can lower. Only how much they can press or lift. HIT and negative accentuated training also puts undo stress on the joints. I experimented with it for three months, and while I lost no size at all, and my chest seemed thicker, I did lose 20 pounds on my max bench press.

There are no short cuts as far as gaining strength and power. Also there are no generic rep set schemes. If lifting for muscle size, the reps should be between 6 and 10 for no more then 6 sets per body part.... or 2 excercises , 3 sets each. If lifting for strength, reps should be between 3 and 5 for up to 9 sets per body part. ALso, strength training should be done with heavier wieghts, with longer rest periods between sets. Training to failure is a definite NO-NO as far as strength training goes. As far as lifting for weight loss or cutting up as it is commonly known, go all out with up to 20 reps per set, 3 or 4 sets per excercise.

Always use good form in a controled manner to eliminate any chance of injury.

In closing, remember all of the Nautilus Fitness centers that were everywhere in the 80's? Why do you think they are no longer around in such volume? Because their principals didnt work, their machines only targeted a very specific muscle, use of their machines does not allow for stabilizer muscles to be worked, and the range of motion that one goes through is radically reduced on any machine, not only Nautilus. Use free weights, do compound movements like the bench press, squat, and deadlift, powercleans, dips, and stay away form things that include cables or machines.

Just my $0.02,
Gary Catherman
 
OP
E

Elfan

Guest
What is "HIT":

http://www.sover.net/~timw/faq07.htm

1.1 What is "HIT"?
The acronym "HIT" stands for High Intensity Training.

HIT in extremely basic form means organizing your workouts so that they are:

Hard - as hard as possible in good form.
Brief - 1-3 sets of a few basic exercises performed in an hour or less.
Infrequent - No more than three times per week, often times two, or even one.
Safe - HIT is intended to be an extremely productive protocol, but also one that stresses safety. One of the fundamental goals of strength training is to act as injury preventative.
That is the essence of HIT. There is nothing complex or "magical". HIT has been used successfully for decades by many trainees without the acronym, "HIT".

It must be noted that High Intensity Training is not a set of principles etched in stone. It is a disciplined style of training which is based on the two universally known factors affecting muscular growth - Overload and Progression.

Repetitions should be done in a controlled fashion so that continuous tension is placed on the muscles. Some use a 2 second count for the concentric (lifting) phase while others use a 20 second count. The key is performing quality repetitions to a point of volitional fatigue.

One set is productive, although some high intensity advocates sometimes choose to perform more than one set. Some people may require additional sets. As a general rule, with of course some exceptions, one set performed in a high intensity manner will provide all the stimulation you need for muscular hypertrophy (growth).

The following is a quote from Dr. Ken Leistner which provides a good synopsis of what High Intensity Training is all about.

"High-intensity training is going all-out, not almost all out. It is taking one set to one's absolute limit, not almost to the limit. It is using whatever equipment that is available, not just a machine or group of machines. It is not the words of two or three men, but a commitment to work as hard as possible while in the gym without socializing, resting excessively between sets, or falling prey to the 'this isn't going to work so I'll copy the star' attitude".

When an exercise is performed in the described high intensity manner, one set usually gives your body optimum strength stimulation. Multiple sets of the same exercise are simply not necessary.

Dorian Yates' (1992-97 Mr. Olympia) trainer, Mike Mentzer, recommends the following:

"Train intensely, train briefly, and train infrequently - it's valid and will work for everyone."

A quote from Mike Mentzer about the "copying the star" mindset so prevalent in "muscle mags" and gyms:

" . . . it is a mistake to point to the 'apparent' success of a couple dozen top title winners as indubitable proof that a certain training approach is efficacious. If one were to look back through the course of their bodybuilding careers and calculate the hours, months and years of wasted effort resulting from their blind, non-theoretical volume approach, one would have to question whether their achievements could properly be termed successful at all." Mike Mentzer, IronMan Magazine, March 1994.

Note that HIT is a very vauge and inclusive term, sort of like "Kenpo."


Nautilus:

Natuilus Bulletin 1: http://www.medxonline.com/Exsci/bulletin1.html

Natuilus Bulletin 2: http://www.medxonline.com/Exsci/bulletin2.html

Both by Arthur Jones, a quick google search will reveal a basic biography.


On HIT and famouse men in thongs:

I woudn't judge HIT or *any* exercise methoidology based on how genetic freaks on steroids preform but
Sergio Olivia andCasey Viator are at least as well known as the Mentzer brothers and both are well known for their involvement with Jones (ie the famouse "Colorodo Experiment.") Like I said though the number of profesional bodybuilders using a program isn't something it should be judged by.
------

For general training recomendation I would recomend the Hardgainer Bodybuilding & Weightlifting FAQ
 

Kalicombat

Green Belt
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
168
Reaction score
3
Location
Sinton, Texas
Elfan,
The Colorado Experiment was a sham. First, Casey Viator made such incredible gains from the amount of anabolic steroids he was on, not due to the amazing methodology of Arthur Jones. The recorded gains themselves are suspect. If the gains that he proclaims were authentic, then why wouldnt Viator stay in Colorado for 6 more months? At those gains, he would have gained over 360 more pounds of muscle. LOL, NOT POSSIBLE.
Also, You are talking about bodybuilders, not a good example of strength athletes. They are in the game for aesthetics, balanced physiques, held up to a standard that has changed over the years as often as most of the bodybuilders change their steroid stacks. My post was in response to Kirks question on strength training. My experience is in powerlifting and extreme weightloss, not bodybuilding. Powerlifters are by no means virgins when it comes to anabolic steroid abuse, but, their goals are far different then a bodybuilder. Look at any top strength athlete in the world, they would never think of following a one set scheme for training, nor would they advocate the super slow methodology of Arthur Jones. Speed is a crucial factor in achieving a 1 rep max. HIT training is not the end-all, be-all of training. If it were, every football team, powerlfiting team and olympic weightlifter in the world would employ such principles. They dont. Intense training is always a must, but those 30 minute, non stop workouts, are not optimal for strength gains. They do work for cutting fat, and even pumping the muscles, which by the way, "getting the pump" is counter productive to strength gains. I dont have the time to research a bunch of studies to post on here, I have to lift weights tonight. I'll just say that Ive been there, and am doing that. Email me if youd like to find out more on my qualifications as far as exercise and fitness goes.

Just my $0.02,
Gary Catherman
 
OP
E

Elfan

Guest
Kalicombat,
I belive you misread the intent of my post. I was mearly trying to explain in general what the amorphous term "HIT" refers to and to point out that it is not mainly popularized by the Mentzer brothers (who I never heard much of personaly even when they were alive). I too could post a number of studies and profesional articles showing why HIT is not the best way to train, I had a list of them at one point in time.

Free weights vs. machines is a seperate discussion.

One set, three sets, both can be useful depending on indvidual needs.
 
OP
W

Wmarden

Guest
What works is the program you are able to stick with some allowance for variation and recovery factors. Overall there are any number of programs one could do to improve specific aspects of their sport/physical activity/etc. HIT works if you do, but it is not quite the way I train. I do respect a great many HIT trainers. Just some of them(like any group it is usually the new converts) seem to think it is the only answer. Even high volume training can work if you have enough discipline and stick to it.

I borrow from those I respect and who have been successful. Look at what champions have done and borrow what you can to make your weight program your own. I had not thought of it that way, but you might consider it a JKD type approach to weight training. Two big influences on my training have been Paul Anderson(strongest man in modern times) and Louie Simmons(trainer of powerlifting champions. I have also borrowed techniques and training ideas from Ed Coan, Vince Anello, and any number of powerlifting champions.

Strength training is fairly simple. Work hard, eat, rest, repeat. As for one versus multiple sets, there are too many variables to say one is better than the other. Pick some ideas and explore them.

In my training I prefer more moderate rep numbers, but perhaps more sets. For example do say 5 sets of 2 in the squat with a moderate weight. And I have done some training where I go for 10 reps in the deadlift and rack pull. Which most don't advocate.

My problem currently in training is trying to figure out how to get it all together and work on my Jujitsu skills. Plus the time I have to devote to other training in my quest to become a police officer.

The above is the long answer, below is the short answer.

"Everything works, but nothing works forever" Louie Simmons.
 

Matt Stone

Master of Arts
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Messages
1,711
Reaction score
30
Location
Fort Lewis, Washington
What are you looking to develop? Strength or size?

If you are looking to maximize the investments in your workout (i.e. best benefit, least time), I have to say that Pavel's PTP workout guidelines are great...

Simplest workout plan - a deadlift (or deadlift variant), 5 sets of 3 - 5 reps; a press (or variant thereof, i.e. military press, standard bench press, etc.), 5 sets of 3 - 5 reps. Now go home.

The workout I do with my buddy from work takes us about an hour to do, three times a week. We use kettlebell as well as regular barbells (no dumbbells at all). If it was just me, it might only take me 20 - 30 minutes (we do a fair share of gawking, chatting and laughing as we lift, so we waste a little time during the workout) at the most.

Gambarimasu.
:asian:
 
OP
M

MartialArtist

Guest
www.bodybuilding.com

Gives some indication on what your goals are. If you want mass, 3 sets of 8-12. If you want strength without gaining a lot of mass, 5-6 sets of 2-6 reps.

Size doesn't equal strength. To attain the two, you have two different training philosophies.
 
OP
P

progressivetactics

Guest
2 things to remember when reading those articles.
first is, who is benefiting by the article. Often, (probably not in this case) thereis a brand name involved, and it is a commercial for them. Xenadrine helped me loose 10000 pounds, blah blah blah. Even the "doctor report' adds are bogus because they are mini commericials for a certian drug. Becareful of those.

Second, Look at your magazine rack at any store. There is about 6 magazines, minimum, at every newstands about body building and health. If they all had the same story, how often can they sell copies? Every body type is different. Not everyone will react the same to 1 set theories, as others will. Some people need pain to gain....some people are genetic freaks who will gain it otherways!
I prefer the pain!!!!!!!!

:mst:
 

Latest Discussions

Top