Reading this story shows two rather conflicting viewpoints on what happened.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/19/walmart.trial/index.html
The one thing everyone can agree on:
Ellis' claim:
However, this is significantly different than the witnesses and the police:
Who is more believable in this case?
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/19/walmart.trial/index.html
The one thing everyone can agree on:
Kennett, Missouri (CNN) -- This much isn't in dispute: Heather Ellis cut in line at a Wal-Mart nearly three years ago.
But the accounts of what happened next vary, depending on whom you ask -- and has divided this economically struggling Missouri town of 11,000 along racial lines.
Ellis' claim:
Ellis, then a college student with no criminal history, said some white patrons shoved and hurled racial slurs at her when she switched checkout lines at Wal-Mart in January 2007.
Store employees refused to give her back her change and called police, she said.
And when she was taken outside to the parking lot, an officer allegedly told her to "Go back to the ghetto." Another roughed her up, she said.
However, this is significantly different than the witnesses and the police:
Witnesses and police offer a different take: Ellis was belligerent, shoving merchandise belonging to another customer to make way for hers on the conveyor belt, kicking one officer in the shin and splitting another's lip.
Who is more believable in this case?