MMA versus Kung Fu Video!

bcbernam777

Brown Belt
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
473
Reaction score
3
Location
Sydney
Ah ha this proves conclusivly that Kung Fu is crap and that grapplers rule the universe
 
OP
Brian R. VanCise

Brian R. VanCise

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 9, 2004
Messages
27,758
Reaction score
1,520
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Ah ha this proves conclusivly that Kung Fu is crap and that grapplers rule the universe

Actually we all know that not to be the case. All it proves is that on this one day the guy who won the match was better. Even though it appears that there were less rules than your typical MMA match today it was still not a real life self defense situation. Chinese martial arts are not only beautiful but effective and I have met with more than a few CMA's that I would not mind having them guarding my back in a violent encounter.

Why I posted this was to generate some discussion regarding this individuals woeful eye attacks on the ground and woeful body positioning. That is what I saw as important. The CMA practitioner was simply not defending the crossbody or side control well. His eye gouge was completely ineffective as well. I will bet after this altercation that he reevaluated his training and hopefully took some measures to counter this.

One practitioners failure in a contest has no bearing on the overall arts effectiveness for self defense.
 

Kembudo-Kai Kempoka

Senior Master
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
2,228
Reaction score
113
Location
Dana Point, CA
Ah ha this proves conclusivly that Kung Fu is crap and that grapplers rule the universe

Not the grappler who lost. aka, the kung fu guy. His leg work displayed a basic knowledge of how to slow a guy going from side mount, to mount, as did his attempt at getting a heel under the grapplers chin in an attempt to peel him off with the leg. Poor selection considering the size difference, but it tells me he spent a few evenings rolling with some buddies who showed him what he HOPED would be enough to keep the wrassler at bay.

So which grappler won? As far as I could see, the more experienced, better conditioned, and stronger/larger of the two...which I would expect to be the case on most days, anyway.

Regards,

Dave
 

bcbernam777

Brown Belt
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
473
Reaction score
3
Location
Sydney
Actually we all know that not to be the case. All it proves is that on this one day the guy who won the match was better. Even though it appears that there were less rules than your typical MMA match today it was still not a real life self defense situation. Chinese martial arts are not only beautiful but effective and I have met with more than a few CMA's that I would not mind having them guarding my back in a violent encounter.

Why I posted this was to generate some discussion regarding this individuals woeful eye attacks on the ground and woeful body positioning. That is what I saw as important. The CMA practitioner was simply not defending the crossbody or side control well. His eye gouge was completely ineffective as well. I will bet after this altercation that he reevaluated his training and hopefully took some measures to counter this.

One practitioners failure in a contest has no bearing on the overall arts effectiveness for self defense.

I know I am just having a dig ;)

Look the TMA practicioner off the bat made a couple of opening errors, the first was that he attacked first. I remember one time reading something Sun Tzu said about two armies at a river, he said let your oponant make the first move then attack whilst he is halfway across the river. We all know the value of allowing your oponant to go first, and that nuerologically reaction is always faster than initiation, that was his first mistake, the second was that he did what every inexperianced TMA does, they go in with the legs (why do they do that), not only does it telegraph intention, it also allows your oponant to catch your root. Those ehere just his opening mistakes.
 

bcbernam777

Brown Belt
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
473
Reaction score
3
Location
Sydney
Not the grappler who lost. aka, the kung fu guy. His leg work displayed a basic knowledge of how to slow a guy going from side mount, to mount, as did his attempt at getting a heel under the grapplers chin in an attempt to peel him off with the leg. Poor selection considering the size difference, but it tells me he spent a few evenings rolling with some buddies who showed him what he HOPED would be enough to keep the wrassler at bay.

So which grappler won? As far as I could see, the more experienced, better conditioned, and stronger/larger of the two...which I would expect to be the case on most days, anyway.

Regards,

Dave

Look I agree the better man won on the day
 

D Dempsey

Green Belt
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
188
Reaction score
4
Location
Fayetteville, North Carolina
I think what it really shows is that recreational martial artists shouldn't challange professional fighters to challange fights. That and don't be so cocky, no one is superman.
 

PeaceWarrior

Green Belt
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
IMO its all about experience and the type of training. I know some TMAists who would definetly hold their own, even against a pro fighter. I just wish that these arrogant "masters" wouldnt do this, it just gives kung fu a bad rep and 90% of people know only what they see on film (concrete evidence obviously) and take it as evidence of how "ineffective" kung fu is...and therefore how superior MMA is...

I also agree 100% with bcb

Peace

Keith
 

thetruth

Black Belt
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
555
Reaction score
10
I think what it really shows is that recreational martial artists shouldn't challange professional fighters to challange fights. That and don't be so cocky, no one is superman.

Gone are the days of true challenge fights. If you challenge anyone you would generally be looking at mma rules and why be a moron and challenge a pro mma guy. In my opinion if you challenge anyone you deserve an *** whipping. I couldn't imagine a challenge happening now days with guys striking the throat, eyes etc.


Cheers
Sam:asian:
 

Odin

2nd Black Belt
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Messages
858
Reaction score
8
Location
England
Going easy on him would have been making him tap out.

What else was he going to do after breaking his arm? Jump up and start stomping on him?

well considering its MMA he could have chosen to mount him and pound him with bare fists ruining that guys goodlooks...or from the side control he had he could have tied him up and unleashed downward elbows (REMEMBER THAT FAMOUS GARY GOODRIDGE MATCH) downward elbows to the head kill you know....instead he chose to use submissions, therefore i thought he went easy.
 

Odin

2nd Black Belt
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Messages
858
Reaction score
8
Location
England
He could have mounted, and thrown punches and elbow to his face. he could have stayed where he was and used knees.

when he pushed his knees to the ground, it would have been very easy to slip to his back, flatten him out, and choke him unconcious.

notice he checked the kick but did no other striking?

I'd say he went easy on him.

whoops i replied before reading your reply....took the words right out of my mouth.( :
 

zDom

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
110
...instead he chose to use submissions, therefore i thought he went easy.

Er.. that is my point: he didn't GO for "submission" (wait for a tap out) he went for a MAIM — breaking his arm.

Personally if I had a choice between maimings, I would prefer some cuts and bruises on my face, even a broken nose, from elbow strikes, for example, over having my elbow dislocated.

I've had my face pounded before (with a tire tool on one occassion, with a lead-filled maglite on another) and I healed up pretty well — heck, I still have my dashing good looks ;) ;) :) (and chicks dig scars :)) But a dislocated elbow can take YEARS to rehabilitate.

A choke would have been even better: loss of conciousness for a few moments, then awakening none worse for the wear other than the loss of pride.

You guys sure do have some strange (to me) ideas of "taking it easy!"
 

dok

Yellow Belt
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Location
DC
well considering its MMA he could have chosen to mount him and pound him with bare fists ruining that guys goodlooks...or from the side control he had he could have tied him up and unleashed downward elbows (REMEMBER THAT FAMOUS GARY GOODRIDGE MATCH) downward elbows to the head kill you know....instead he chose to use submissions, therefore i thought he went easy.

The way it seemed to me was that the pro MMA fighter was showing respect to his opponents skills. He was keeping a very tight lid on him and not allowing him the possibility to strike back. You're assuming he would have been able to strike him with impunity if he went for the GnP. That may be the case, but based on the fact that this guy was betting 25 G's on his skills ( the KF guy ), I'm willing to bet he knew a thing or two.

Grappling was simply beyond him. If you don't know and train grappling, its damn near impossible to reverse an undesirable situation.

I'd agree with zDom, breaking someones arm is not exactly showing leniency.
 

HG1

Blue Belt
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
234
Reaction score
6
Location
USA
I know, its not the style thats fighting and all, I was just curious. I cant really tell by his stance, although it looks like an external style maybe? Hung Gar?

It looks like he kinda went blindly into his attack to me and maybe he didnt expect it to go to the ground? Pretty stupid IMO
Interesting....I don't think Kung Fu Man is Hung-Ga. We don't wear that jacket, most schools it's just a t-shirt.

As for the technique or lack of it. Kung Fu Man doesn't kick but feeds his leg to MMA Guy, which plays right into his grappling speciality - take em to the ground & finish em off. One legged Kung Fu Man didn't stand a chance.
 

Odin

2nd Black Belt
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Messages
858
Reaction score
8
Location
England
''He was a standup specialist who thought he could beat a MMA fighter using eye gouges, finger breaks, and pressure points.

He actually did have a small amount of ground fighting experience as you can see when he defends the mount. However, he didn't have enough to understand not to go for the eye gouge from an inferior position.l''


I read that on that on the kungfumagazine link posted up.

Where have i heard this before hey? ''eye gouges, finger breaks and pressure points'' i seem to hear that in every Tma vs Mma argument (ie..if someone had me in mount i would gouges his eyes out!raghhhh!!)not saying that the video disproves that notion but i think everyone should now relise its not that easy.

and i dont know about you but if someone is trying to gouge my eyes out DMAN RIGHT IM GOING TO SNAP HIS ARM!he's be lucky if i didnt go for a leg lock and really mess him up for life.
 

7starmantis

Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 13, 2002
Messages
5,493
Reaction score
55
Location
East Texas
''He was a standup specialist who thought he could beat a MMA fighter using eye gouges, finger breaks, and pressure points.

He actually did have a small amount of ground fighting experience as you can see when he defends the mount. However, he didn't have enough to understand not to go for the eye gouge from an inferior position.l''


I read that on that on the kungfumagazine link posted up.

Where have i heard this before hey? ''eye gouges, finger breaks and pressure points'' i seem to hear that in every Tma vs Mma argument (ie..if someone had me in mount i would gouges his eyes out!raghhhh!!)not saying that the video disproves that notion but i think everyone should now relise its not that easy.

and i dont know about you but if someone is trying to gouge my eyes out DMAN RIGHT IM GOING TO SNAP HIS ARM!he's be lucky if i didnt go for a leg lock and really mess him up for life.

Well, while you have a good point, the quote you posted is simply someones own thoughts and viewpoints of the fight, so its really just opinoins at best. No one really knows what the "kung fu guy" was planning or thought....do you? Obviously it was something other than serious fight training, but we can't really debate his thoughts, ideas, or plans can we?
 

Odin

2nd Black Belt
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Messages
858
Reaction score
8
Location
England
Well, while you have a good point, the quote you posted is simply someones own thoughts and viewpoints of the fight, so its really just opinoins at best. No one really knows what the "kung fu guy" was planning or thought....do you? Obviously it was something other than serious fight training, but we can't really debate his thoughts, ideas, or plans can we?

You can see him clearly going for eye gouges in the film...and also pulling the MMA guys hair.

All we can do is express our thoughts and opinions its the best way to get a conclusion.
 

Odin

2nd Black Belt
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Messages
858
Reaction score
8
Location
England
Thats the thing about any form of fighting it just isnt easy

Agreed.

It just annoys me when people have the whole ''if he does this i would just do this'' mentality, when reality is much different.
 

Whitebelt

Blue Belt
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
209
Reaction score
7
Location
Located
Where is the arm snap? I didn't see it. Is it that little lock at the end that snaps his sholder or is it somewhere else?
 

Latest Discussions

Top