Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could someone explain Kenpo sparring combinations, ie., B1A1, A2B1, etc...? Is there something out there that explains this? I've seen it around quite a bit but still boggled about what all that means.
Thanks a million!
Just an observation ... Isn't this a contradiction? They say FREEstyle techniques, but then there are set movements and strikes.
Walk then run. You're reading the walk part and notice it stops at green belt.....does it really STOP or does it become FREE?....
I would say at green it becomes FREE ... but eventhough not completely accurate, I stick by my original comment ... at the point of learning, although it may be totally necessary, it is not FREE.
"Let me see you freestyle" ... jab, cross, uppercut ... "No, no ... that should be jab, cross, hook, uppercut!" ... where's the freestyle in that?
Simple reason. Because the techniques are used to train people in the basics required for "Freestyle" sparring.
Same as many of Kenpo's "Self-Defense Techniques" are not actually techniques for use in self defense but are lessons in the basics of self-defense.
The term freestyle is implausible in and of itself as every style/competition has rules, principles, concepts, theories and basic movements. As soon as you introduce any form of structure it is no longer "free". So where is there ever really "freestyle"?
So stand by your original comment, even though not completely accurate, and I'll stand by mine. 'In short, NO." The term merely indicates what purpose those movements serve within the American Kenpo curriculum. You're debating semantics , which is fine. But.....where is there ever "freestyle" in anything? What people commonly learn as freestlye is taught with some form of structure which negates the "freeness".
It's not "Let me see you freestyle" ... jab, cross, uppercut ... "No, no ... that should be jab, cross, hook, uppercut!"
It's "lets work this combination "jab, cross, hook, uppercut"
"ok now mix it up: jab, cross, hook, uppercut / jab, hook, cross, uppercut / jab, hook, uppercut, cross"
"ok now spar and apply what you learned about combinations, timing, reactions, reading, guaging distance, etc. "
The lesson isn't in the order of moves. Just like the lesson in boxing isn't in the order of "jab, cross, hook, uppercut". That's just Who, How and What. What about When, Where, Why?
I would say at green it becomes FREE ... but eventhough not completely accurate, I stick by my original comment ... at the point of learning, although it may be totally necessary, it is not FREE.
"Let me see you freestyle" ... jab, cross, uppercut ... "No, no ... that should be jab, cross, hook, uppercut!" ... where's the freestyle in that?
thanks for the link KJJ3. very informative, but i guess i am still missing something here.
i think i understand the basemove, first variation/second variation, but it really doesn't distinguish right from left, etc.
is there a link somewhere out there that has these on vid?
I don't know if anyone has put all the frestyles on video, but that would be a very cool collection (albeit, boring to watch) if they did.
If it exists, James either has it, or will shortly.
opcorn:
I don't know if anyone has put all the frestyles on video, but that would be a very cool collection (albeit, boring to watch) if they did.
If it exists, James either has it, or will shortly.
opcorn:
They are still bound by agreed upon rules.Free style is the ability to flow / interact with your opponent without being bound to any restrictive style oriented technique.
Free of Style.
:ultracool
Unless, of course, one of those agreen upon rules is a style restriction.:ultracoolYes, agreed upon rules, restricted to style, no.