It depends.
Personally, Im an Infighter. I think in terms of Infighting, and its naturally where Im comfortable.
Im tall, though not especially heavy built. It works just fine for Me. (Heavy in terms of bulk. I have plentiful muscle to throw around, just not in bulk)
Ultimately, it comes down to what Youre good at. Because Infighters beat Outfighters all the time. Outfighters also beat Infighters. No one has some trump card over the other. In both Boxing and Taekwondo, Ive had success with people of the same mindset, and of the outfighting mindset. Ive also had failures, mostly against superior Infighters, in both cases.
Thats just My experience, and My opinion.
In terms of Boxing, Boxing is a great big Pallet. Because no one Infighter will be the same as another. I tend to use Straight Punches and Body Hooks, where one or two people think Im crazy for not going ballistic with Uppercuts. It works though. It works just fine. Much like how not all Boxers lead with a Jab. The majority do, but a proper Lead Straight, or even leading with the Rear Hand, aint exactly unheard of.
And debating one to be better than the other, is like debating having a vertical or horizontal or diagonal fist shape. Its a fist, and all three will work just fine. Infighting and Outfighting are just as good as each other, with little to no unbalance of advantages and disadvantages. But trying to tell someone whos at home up close, to be at home at a distance, is counterintuitive, as far as Im concerned. If Your instinct is to Grapple, and Youre comfortable Grappling, as oppose to Striking, You shouldnt then proceed to go learn Kickboxing as oppose to, say, a Grappling System. If Youre comfortable with Striking, Ok. Step 1 complete. Step 2 is deciding if You have a range preference. Step 3 is cultivating that, either by going with a System that focuses on that, or which offers a pallet, like Boxing, to allow You to do it of Your own volition.
Here was Me planning to just write 1 paragraph
