ballen0351
Sr. Grandmaster
Correct. The statistics show it. Just because you choose to ignore it doesn't make it less true.They are according to you proof of the success of two week programs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct. The statistics show it. Just because you choose to ignore it doesn't make it less true.They are according to you proof of the success of two week programs.
Correct. The statistics show it. Just because you choose to ignore it doesn't make it less true.
They don't "need" anything that's why I said it shouldn't be mandatory. But more is always better.Then why would anyone need more training?
The success rate is phenomenal.
I knew a guy who did two years for pretty much doing that.
A police officer?
I also think they should get more range time other than twice a year, More constitution and criminal law classes, tactics classes on active shooter, building searches, vehicle stops, more training on alot of things because it just makes everyone better.
Arguing BJJ is better on an internet forum doesnt help either.But nobody does because nobody cares.
Police are disposable.
Arguing two weeks is good enough doesn't help.
Happens a couple times a year, in one way or another...
Arguing BJJ is better on an internet forum doesnt help either.
However as an instructor I along with other instructors have tried for YEARS to get more training mandated in my state without success.
Except you are not and have never been nor have you ever taken a police DT class so your opinion is welllllllll......nevermind Bjj good cops bad....lather rinse repeat.Arguing BJJ is better helps until someone can fix DT.
And nobody is going to fix DT any time soon.
And DT instructors mostly just can't be told without them having a world class sook.
So for police. Smile. Nod. Do the DT.
Then go and enroll in a bjj school. Because it is better.
You're deflecting this to a discussion of whether some MA systems are good or not. That has nothing to do with what I posted, and you know that quite well. You're just trying to drag out old arguments that really don't have bearing to what we're talking about.So this is why some methods allways appear on YouTube as being successful?
Proven grappling, proven striking generally shown to work and work constantly. And the more esoteric methods never do.
And we see this across the board of the spectrum of human conflict.
And we hear this anecdotally across the board of the spectrum of human conflict.
But what the argument seems to be at this stage is there is all this conflict that is occurring using methods that are so fundementally different that only a specialized instructor from a specific country can understand the process.
This is occurring away from the public eye in such a manner that nobody has a chance to film this or record it. Even though people are filming and recording other conflict involving exactly the people we are discussing.
So, 2 weeks of BJJ will fix it?Arguing BJJ is better helps until someone can fix DT.
And nobody is going to fix DT any time soon.
And DT instructors mostly just can't be told without them having a world class sook.
So for police. Smile. Nod. Do the DT.
Then go and enroll in a bjj school. Because it is better.
Somehow, you've decided "working" = "optimal".Then why would anyone need more training?
The success rate is phenomenal.
We had one of those happen 20 or so years ago in South Carolina. Warms my soul, that does.
So, 2 weeks of BJJ will fix it?
Except you are not and have never been nor have you ever taken a police DT class so your opinion is welllllllll......nevermind Bjj good cops bad....lather rinse repeat.
I didn’t read it, but I’m quite sure I know what happened.