Debate on the existence of Chi

[barriecusvein]

I'm not sold on the existence of chi, but those 'healers' sound like they may be on to something. Either that, or those healers haven't learned to deal in prozac and ritalin yet.

:rofl:

 

[DuneViking]

-You can't be serious. You don't understand the scientific method either it appears. For yet another time... I cannot prove a negative. People here claim chi exists. To prove that scientifically, the burden of proof lies with them. Wikipedia is your friend. Or any 7th grade science teacher.

1- Bob- thanks-understood.

2- Ronin- Actually, I have 2 science degrees, worked in an analytical lab, and teach. My explination is correct. Furthermore juris prudence states that one who makes the assertion, as you did in your first post, has burden of proof.