curbs on war robots urged

bribrius

Green Belt
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/curbs-on-war-robots-urged-20100917-15g98.html


Curbs on war robots urged

September 18, 2010



drone_Lead-420x0.jpg
Members from the Tiger Aircraft Maintenance Unit performing last minute pre-flight checks on the Predator drone before take off. Photo: AP

LONDON: The rapid proliferation of military drone planes and armed robots should be subject to international legal controls, conferences in London and Berlin will argue this month.
Public awareness of attacks by unmanned aerial vehicles, such as Reapers and Predators, in Afghanistan and Pakistan has grown but less is known of unmanned ground vehicles.
Two conferences - today's Drone Wars in London and a three-day workshop organised by the International Committee for Robot Arms Control in Berlin beginning on Monday - will hear calls for bans and for tighter regulation under international arms treaties.
The development of what is known as ''autonomous targeting'' - where unmanned planes and military ground vehicles are engineered to lock automatically on to what their onboard computers assume is the enemy - has heightened concern.
Research to enable unmanned aerial and ground vehicles to work collaboratively is under way, ensuring each machine selects a different target.
This has reinforced fears that unmanned aerial vehicle strikes wherever future wars are fought will increase death tolls.
Defence equipment manufacturers insist there is always ''a man in the [control] loop'' to authorise operations and they are far less indiscriminate than the high level air force saturation bombing that occurred in World War II.
Noel Sharkey, a professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at Sheffield University, said: ''Our biggest concern … is autonomous systems that [select] targets themselves.''
David Webb, a professor of engineering at Leeds Metropolitan University, said: ''If they kill somebody by mistake do you put the robot on trial?''
 

MA-Caver

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
14,960
Reaction score
312
Location
Chattanooga, TN
Strongly agree here... it's called playing with fire. Some hapless civilians are gonna get burned... again and again and again.

Don't TRUST these damned machines!
 

Bob Hubbard

Retired
MT Mentor
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 4, 2001
Messages
47,245
Reaction score
772
Location
Land of the Free
If the AI is strong enough, and there's a human who ok's the 'go' order who reviews things, I'm ok with it. Civilians are always going to be effected in war, but a couple of battledroids taking out a goat herder or coffee shop is a lot less of a 'negative conflict outcome' than say carpet bombing a valley and finding out later you fragged an entire village. Of course, I'm a supporter for letting them patrol the US/Mexico border on full auto in a designated 'no-mans-land'.
 

Marginal

Senior Master
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
3,276
Reaction score
67
Location
Colorado
Given how easily they've been hacked in the past (well, there was no encryption so I dunno if hacked is an applicable term here) I'd rather not have the things running on auto.
 
Top