'Chu Tai Chi' in New York - anyone have opinions?

Zorlio

White Belt
Hi,
I'm interested in taking up tai chi lessons and I was looking up some places in NYC and was wondering if anyone has any info on Chu Tai Chi http://www.chutaichi.com/ or on master C.K. Chu?
I'm pretty new to the tai chi scene so I'll take suggestions of other places in NYC (yang or chen).

thanks
 
I do not know anything about the school you have provided the link for and the only people in the NYC area that I know anything about and would recommend are Ren Guanyi who teachers Chen Style and Alex Dong who teaches Dong (Tung) Style, Yang Style and possibly Hao Style.

However I am sure there are more and there are some on MT that are in the NYC area that may be able to give you more information.
 
hi Zorlio, welcome to the wonderful world of tai chi... i teach on long island and know of a couple of good options in manhattan. I'll PM you.

pete.
 
Why does he keep looking down!!! Its a martial art, he should be looking at his opponent!!! Looking down means no high spirit. But then thats one of the things I dislike about Chen Man-ching form.

Very best wishes
 
thanks for the replies

Speaking of William C.C. Chen, on the "Chu Tai Chi" website, it says that Master C.K. Chu studied with William C.C. Chen and then assisted teaching in his school.

(I dunno why I'm so focused on the chutaichi place; maybe it's the great website layout)

here's a clip: http://mefeedia.com/entry/master-ck-chu-yang-short-form/6711256/
how does it look, good/bad/mediocre?

If you are focused on it go give it a try and see what you think. Try a few others and see what you think as well and they go for whatever one you like best

Whether or not I like or don't like the video should not make a difference.
 
Why does he keep looking down!!! Its a martial art, he should be looking at his opponent!!! Looking down means no high spirit. But then thats one of the things I dislike about Chen Man-ching form.

Very best wishes

That's not a standard ZMQ form in the least. Compare to the actual ZMQ:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=USJPmCZ6Efc

As you can see, there are many differences.

I thought Chu was some variant of Wu style?

He certainly has his own flavor. Not my style, but not necessarily unworkable.

As a side note, William C.C. Chen was a student of ZMQ. That's true. But he doesn't do the ZMQ 37. He does a longer 67(?) posture form that seems essentially the same as J.J. Soong's 64. Both forms were attempts to put back the Yang moves that ZMQ took out, although they kept many of the ZMQ characteristics.
 
Formosa Neijia,

My impression was that this was more CMC than Wu style. It certainly isn't Yang Cheng-fu!!!! On a second, more close look, I agree that it is not pure CMC either. He only does one Strum the Lute followed by one Brush and Push then straight into Step Up Parry and Punch.

Not my cup of tea, but then thats only my personal opinion.

Very best wishes
 
Why does he keep looking down!!! Its a martial art, he should be looking at his opponent!!! Looking down means no high spirit. But then thats one of the things I dislike about Chen Man-ching form.

Very best wishes

Having studied the Cheng-Man form with one of his students I can assure you that this isn't his form and is unrepresentative of it's basic principles... I can't speak for every practitioner of this form, but I was explicitly taught to keep my eyes up, the head suspended and never ever to lock the front knee when shifting the weight back as frequently happens in that video.

Here's a reasonably good example of the CMC form, despite it looking to me as though he overextends knee over toe a few times (though this may be more a matter of the angle of the camera) :
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the replies

Speaking of William C.C. Chen, on the "Chu Tai Chi" website, it says that Master C.K. Chu studied with William C.C. Chen and then assisted teaching in his school.

(I dunno why I'm so focused on the chutaichi place; maybe it's the great website layout)

here's a clip: http://mefeedia.com/entry/master-ck-chu-yang-short-form/6711256/
how does it look, good/bad/mediocre?

I know you like this website, but that form is worse than bad, it's atrocious.
 
I suggest you visit a class taught by my teacher, Master Yu Cheng-Hsiang. He studied with Cheng Man-Ching and before that with Lee Soo-Chin in Taiwan. You can check him out at his very simple Web site www.taichi108.com. Like him, the site is quite unadorned, but it tells a unique story of an amazing teacher. I have studied with a number of teachers, including Cheng Man-Ching back in the early 1970s, William Chen and a number of others. No one is like Master Yu. But he is, shall we say, decidedly old-school.

His schedule is on the site.
 
I suggest you visit a class taught by my teacher, Master Yu Cheng-Hsiang. He studied with Cheng Man-Ching and before that with Lee Soo-Chin in Taiwan. You can check him out at his very simple Web site www.taichi108.com. Like him, the site is quite unadorned, but it tells a unique story of an amazing teacher. I have studied with a number of teachers, including Cheng Man-Ching back in the early 1970s, William Chen and a number of others. No one is like Master Yu. But he is, shall we say, decidedly old-school.

His schedule is on the site.

thanks for the link

this has probably been answered before, but, what is the difference between the Cheng Man-Ching style of tai chi and the traditional Yang style taught by Yang Sau Chung (son of Yang Chengfu)? I ask because I found this one place in NY (nytaichi.com) run by H. Won Gim who was a student of Gin Soon Chu from Boston who was taught by Yang Sau Chung. So now I'm all confused; traditional yang style, Chen Man Ching style, help :erg:
 
thanks for the link

this has probably been answered before, but, what is the difference between the Cheng Man-Ching style of tai chi and the traditional Yang style taught by Yang Sau Chung (son of Yang Chengfu)? I ask because I found this one place in NY (nytaichi.com) run by H. Won Gim who was a student of Gin Soon Chu from Boston who was taught by Yang Sau Chung. So now I'm all confused; traditional yang style, Chen Man Ching style, help :erg:

That's a bit of a can of worms. I would suggest you do some reading:
http://sataichi.com/compare.html

This goes into good detail about the difference between ZMQ and Yang Zhen-duos taiji.
 
That's a bit of a can of worms. I would suggest you do some reading:
http://sataichi.com/compare.html

This goes into good detail about the difference between ZMQ and Yang Zhen-duos taiji.


Thanks, I read that a while back and then lost the link and I have been looking for it fo awhile now.

Now if I can just find the Fu compared to Yang Jun compared to Tung Hu Ling link again all will will be right with the world.

And yes that is a can of worms, If I ever want to get my sifu going I talk about CMC :D
 
Xue Sheng,

I'll bet you only mention CMC to your Sifu when you want to experience more pain. As if beating on trees wasn't enough!!!!
icon7.gif


Very best wishes
 
Xue Sheng,

I'll bet you only mention CMC to your Sifu when you want to experience more pain. As if beating on trees wasn't enough!!!!
icon7.gif


Very best wishes

I learned NEVER to bring up CMC while training with my Sifu :D, but then bringing up Tung Hu Ling just gives him happy memories and ideas which can be equally as painful
 
Back
Top