Yes the mere beilief that answers lie in future scientific discovery is a faith[/I]
It's not a faith at all. It's based on the concept of a useful working assumption: that a method of inquiry which has served us as a guide to knowledge in the past will continue to do so, and will continue to modify and revise its own previous conclusions. I don't know what your use of `mere' adds here, but science as a mode of observation. reasoning and testing has pretty well shown itself without competition over the past several thousands of year. Go from the Aristotelian view of the cosmos, to the Copernican, to the refinements of Kepler and Newton, to the perspective of modern physics, and you will find that each step added greater generality while preserving the correct results of the previous `best theory'. Newton showed that the same mathematical relations which govern the motions of the planets also governed the behavior of billiard balls and out of control vehicles on planet Earth. Special relativity showed that the same modifications to Newton's theory necessitated by the constancy of the speed of light for all observers also accounted for the otherwise inexplicably long life of certain very short-lived particles travelling at nearly the speed of light... Science isn't a belief system, it's a method of inquiry which demands that you apply the most economical reasoning possible to data, formulate conclusions that accord with your observations and then keep those conclusions in mind when you encounter new data.
Imagine someone in the 15th century saying the above line that I've quoted from you by way of dismissal of a doctor's belief that someday we will find a way to eliminate smallpox. It doesn't play any better in the early 21st century, Sean. We may be wrong about our conclusions, but we know how to find out that we are and make corrections. Do `theisms' do that?
... A personal god? Your concept of God does not limit theism.
Sean
It's not my concept. It's a
dictionary definition. Check out the Oxford English dictionary, or any of a dozen others.
You're the one using the word `theism'---OK, well, that's what the word means---as you'd expect, given its etymology, right? If you mean something else, use a different word whose meaning coincides with your intention. My concept of God isn't the issue here; your statements are what are issue.