Headhunter
Senior Master
I saw this posted on Facebook. It's written from a kenpo perspective but it does offer some interesting insights into form practice in general.
Kenpo Karate Forms
Kenpo Karate Forms
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I suppose it depends how the forms are used and what's in them. My forms aren't open to much deeper reading, though I understand many are.l can't speak for Kempo, but this article suggests a rather superficial reading of forms for my tastes.
Bruce lee still did forms himself. All that meant was people thought that he didn't so they thought because the all great god Bruce lee didn't then no one else should do it. Mainly Bruce lees obsessive fan base everyone else didn't care less what Bruce lee didIn my experience, Kenpo Forms, and how they are understood in kenpo tend to be different from what you would find in a traditional Chinese or Okinawan system. I tend to not be a fan of the kenpo approach to forms, and I think there tends to be a lot of unsupportable build-up and jargon that goes along with them, in some of the kenpo lineages.
The author makes an early comment about forms falling out of favor in the 1960s and 1970s, due to Bruce Lee’s comments. I believe that is not true. Forms did not simply disappear due to Mr. Lee’s comments. Outside of his immediate circle, I do not believe he was all that influential.
I think moving in form is important, but not a particular form. It is a lot more interesting than standing there kicking over, and over, and it is more dynamic than repeating a single tech idea.There are some styles that focus on forms and supplement with techniques, like kung fu. Then there are other styles that focus on techniques and supplement with forms, like kenpo. In my opinion, the techniques that you learn in the forms (depending of course on your style of kenpo) are merely a repetition of what you learn in your techniques. Aside from creating a seamless transition between already known techniques, I don't see kenpo forms as much of a benefit.
Personally I don't believe forms are necessary but there's no harm in them either. They're good learning aids good for co-ordination, balance, muscle memory etc and they're a good motivation for students something for them to learn. Are they absolutely necessary for self defence? No but they're still useful and at the end of the day in my opinion they're fun to learn.
Bruce lee still did forms himself. All that meant was people thought that he didn't so they thought because the all great god Bruce lee didn't then no one else should do it. Mainly Bruce lees obsessive fan base everyone else didn't care less what Bruce lee did
The only difference I can think of between forms and shadow boxing is (assuming you're improvising in shadow boxing) the improvisation. There is both good and bad in that - it's good to work a lot of different transitions, but it may also lead to avoiding areas you need to work on. If forms are (at least some of the time) performed with intent and at the rhythm and speed of actual application, they serve much the same purpose.Forms are a perfectly good training tool as long as you understand the limitations of them and do other things alongside. I always find it amusing how some people believe that shadow boxing is a perfectly legitimate training tool, but then say Martial Arts forms are stupid and useless. To me they are the same thing and every pro and con that applies to forms also applies to shadow boxing. Of course this depends a lot on the individual form, and some forms are clearly meant for demonstrations, not training.
I've wondered if Lee's distinction between "set" and "form" was a matter of pickiness. Most forms, there are very specific "right" ways - specific hand and foot positions, stances, etc. Were his sets more free with that? You did a series of techniques, making the transitions in whatever way worked, etc?That is actually kinda true. In more than one interview with Guro Dan I saw him talk about what Bruce Lee called "sets." The most telling one was the JKD version of the Mook and the changes that Bruce made in his sets from the form in WC. Thing is it was set sequence of movements. So in some ways the lack of "forms" in JKD appeared, at least in the case of the Mook, to be a matter of semantics.
im not sure shadow boxing its self is a particulary good training tool, or that high level boxers invest muchtime in it, other than perhaps,as a warm up toolForms are a perfectly good training tool as long as you understand the limitations of them and do other things alongside. I always find it amusing how some people believe that shadow boxing is a perfectly legitimate training tool, but then say Martial Arts forms are stupid and useless. To me they are the same thing and every pro and con that applies to forms also applies to shadow boxing. Of course this depends a lot on the individual form, and some forms are clearly meant for demonstrations, not training.
I've wondered if Lee's distinction between "set" and "form" was a matter of pickiness. Most forms, there are very specific "right" ways - specific hand and foot positions, stances, etc. Were his sets more free with that? You did a series of techniques, making the transitions in whatever way worked, etc?
its,sets,consisting of forms, so if you do a number of forms , that makes one,set. ( sets being that which is SET out to be done)Well many of the sets were basically partner drills it was the Mook that made me say "hmmmm" if you go to 7:45, Guro Dan uses the term "sets" but, interestingly, the caption before the demonstration uses the term form. That's what made me ask..."is it really just semantics?"
im not sure shadow boxing its self is a particulary good training tool, or that high level boxers invest muchtime in it, other than perhaps,as a warm up tool