Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thatās not the point of the thread...aikido doesnāt teach how to punch and other things usually so why not cross trainAnother observation of mine: do people really think to themselves, āIām training this thing that simply does not work, so Iām going to go cross-train in something else that does work, that I can then use to fix and make this non-working thing workā¦ā
If someone really felt that what they trained does not work, and they want to train in something that they can make work, would they not simply abandon it and go train something else altogether, perhaps whatever they might have cross-trained and then used to fix it?
It just seems like a lot of mental (and physical) gymnastics to go through to justify continuing to do something, if you simply do not believe in it to begin with.
I understand that punching and kicking is not typically seen in aikido, although I also understand that it can be, and Ueshiba said it should be. But then your statement here is assuming that people decide it doesnāt work, so they train something that they believe does work, to fix something that does not work, and make it work. Perhaps people doing aikido believe that it does work, and the somewhat unique approach to conflict that is found in aikido has merit in its own way, so why would they feel cross training is necessary? I think the thought process here does not make sense.Thatās not the point of the thread...aikido doesnāt teach how to punch and other things usually so why not cross train
Iām sure plenty of people do make aikido work. Iāve met a few who I am sure are very capable with it. Iām not sure how that first comment connects with the second one, about lawsuits and such.Plenty of people make aikido work, secondly kicking and punching people isnāt always the best thing to do, it can lead to lawsuits and arrest.
No, my point was that aikido is an art you use after learning other arts...the founder of Aikido was Already an expert in other arts.I understand that punching and kicking is not typically seen in aikido, although I also understand that it can be, and Ueshiba said it should be. But then your statement here is assuming that people decide it doesnāt work, so they train something that they believe does work, to fix something that does not work, and make it work. Perhaps people doing aikido believe that it does work, and the somewhat unique approach to conflict that is found in aikido has merit in its own way, so why would they feel cross training is necessary? I think the thought process here does not make sense.
By way of example, I train a kung fu method that is heavy on punching. We tend to not engage in grappling, although it is my firm belief that the concepts upon which our method is built, could apply well in grappling. At any rate, I donāt feel that I need to cross train in other systems, including grappling, to make my system work. It isnāt broken. It does not need to be fixed. Within the unique approach to combat that my system takes, there is plenty that works quite well.
However, I have trained other methods in the past, and as I stated above, all that we have done continues to influence all that we do, whether it is intentional or not. So there is a grain of salt in the mix.
Getting back to aikido, I suppose a wide interest in martial methods could encourage a person to train in other methods that he then finds is helpful in understanding his aikido. But that is kind of accidental and to his benefit. To suddenly have that extra point of view that strengthens his aikido. But that is different from setting out to find a way through cross training, to āfixā aikido. I canāt read peoplesā minds, but it seems to me if someone felt aikido needed to be fixed, they would simply stop doing it altogether if other martial options that they feel better about, are available to them.
So that gets to your original question: āDo you train aikido with other arts, to make it work on the street.ā I think the logic there does not make sense.
You acknowledge below that aikido does workā¦
Iām sure plenty of people do make aikido work. Iāve met a few who I am sure are very capable with it. Iām not sure how that first comment connects with the second one, about lawsuits and such.
I'm glad you brought this up. I really don't like the term "Make it work." when applied to martial arts. The term assumes that something is broken, but the truth is often that the person doesn't understand it.Another observation of mine: do people really think to themselves, āIām training this thing that simply does not work, so Iām going to go cross-train in something else that does work, that I can then use to fix and make this non-working thing workā¦ā
If someone really felt that what they trained does not work, and they want to train in something that they can make work, would they not simply abandon it and go train something else altogether, perhaps whatever they might have cross-trained and then used to fix it?
It just seems like a lot of mental (and physical) gymnastics to go through to justify continuing to do something, if you simply do not believe in it to begin with.
If Aikido works for plenty of people. They probably aren't "Making it work" they are probably doing it correctly and with a high level of understanding of the techniques.Plenty of people make aikido work, s
Well, the founder created his aikido based on his prior experiences. I would say that every single martial method that is created is done that way. They do not spring forth fully formed from a vacuum. A founder of a martial method does not do so without first becoming experienced in martial methods. All martial arts were based on something ancestral to it. The fact that the founder based it on prior training, does not mean that today aikido only works if you have a prior background first. By that logic, one could say that Tae Kwon Do, or Shotokan, or Shaolin Longfist, or BJJ only work if you already have other training. I think we all know that is not true.No, my point was that aikido is an art you use after learning other arts...the founder of Aikido was Already an expert in other arts.
Sure, they might. The results could go either way.Fine, thatās great, others might say that one day you could run into a judo or BJJ guy who will just take you down and choke you out...but as you said it doesnāt mean your arts useless.
If you feel that aikido ālacksā something, then it sounds to me like you are trying to āfixā it by adding to it. Perhaps what you are trying to add does not fit within the methodology and the approach to combat that is uniquely aikido. Maybe aikido is perfectly fine for what it is and for what it is meant to accomplish. Maybe you are trying to make it into something it was never meant to be. I can pound a nail with a screwdriver, but it does not work very well. But a screwdriver was never meant to pound a nail. If I make a screwdriver look more like a hammer, have I āfixedā the screwdriver?Itās not fixing aikido...itās just adding to what aikido lacks by itself. If Iām a pro boxer and go into the UFC get arm barred and learn wrestling Iām not fixing my boxing..Iām adding to my game.
Well sure, it depends on circumstances. But how does that have anything to do with whether aikido āworksā or not?if you were to engage me in a fight and injure me I could possibly sue you, if you simply locked my hand or fingers i wouldnāt be injured too bad as if I received a broken nose, face, etc...
Nope.No, my point was that aikido is an art you use after learning other arts...the founder of Aikido was Already an expert in other arts.
Not what Ive read so Iām not gonna even bother reading, ty
My point was that no one art has the answer, the biggest martial artists I know have rankings in multiple arts.Well, the founder created his aikido based on his prior experiences. I would say that every single martial method that is created is done that way. They do not spring forth fully formed from a vacuum. A founder of a martial method does not do so without first becoming experienced in martial methods. All martial arts were based on something ancestral to it. The fact that the founder based it on prior training, does not mean that today aikido only works if you have a prior background first. By that logic, one could say that Tae Kwon Do, or Shotokan, or Shaolin Longfist, or BJJ only work if you already have other training. I think we all know that is not true.
Sure, they might. The results could go either way.
If you feel that aikido ālacksā something, then it sounds to me like you are trying to āfixā it by adding to it. Perhaps what you are trying to add does not fit within the methodology and the approach to combat that is uniquely aikido. Maybe aikido is perfectly fine for what it is and for what it is meant to accomplish. Maybe you are trying to make it into something it was never meant to be. I can pound a nail with a screwdriver, but it does not work very well. But a screwdriver was never meant to pound a nail. If I make a screwdriver look more like a hammer, have I āfixedā the screwdriver?
Boxing works perfectly well in the boxing ring, for which it is designed. If you want to compete in MMA, then you need to learn something else. But that is not a shortcoming of boxing. And boxing can translate quite well into street self defense. Nobody needs to train other things to make boxing work.
Well sure, it depends on circumstances. But how does that have anything to do with whether aikido āworksā or not?
So you've made up your mind and it doesn't matter what evidence to the contrary anyone provides.Not what Ive read so Iām not gonna even bother reading, ty
One An article isnāt exactly some ground breaking evidence though...I mean I can look up videos of his studentsSo you've made up your mind and it doesn't matter what evidence to the contrary anyone provides.
I think there's a word to describe that sort of mindset...
if you were to engage me in a fight and injure me I could possibly sue you, if you simply locked my hand or fingers i wouldnāt be injured too bad as if I received a broken nose, face, etc...
So you've made up your mind and it doesn't matter what evidence to the contrary anyone provides.
I think there's a word to describe that sort of mindset...
I donāt follow what your message is. I have rankings in multiple arts, for what itās worth. Not that that makes me anyone special.My point was that no one art has the answer, the biggest martial artists I know have rankings in multiple arts.
Iām not a fighter so I wouldnāt know
I already discussed this
That is definitely not my message. I personally would like to study aikido, and I am afraid I probably missed my chance to train with some highly skilled fellows when I left San Francisco. I regret that, but life is busy and time is limited. I think it would be time well spent though, although I recognize my body at my age might object to all the falling. Maybe I will have an opportunity yet to do so.Iāll research the matter further
But thatās not really the point of this thread...Iām asking if aikido practitioners often cross train...this seems to be turning into another silly aikido sucks thread.
Iāve said no such thing. Iāve actually been saying the opposite. I believe aikido (as far as I understand it) has everything it needs to be functional, and I am questioning the very idea that someone must have prior background in other martial systems in order to aikido to be useful.i asked if anyone trains in aikido and if so do they cross train. You are ranked in multiple arts yet donāt see the use of aikido...youāve said this, why repeat it 4 times.