my point is about numbers. eventually the poor will outnumber the good or great.
In that case, yes, definitely.
But honestly, is it really a problem anyway?
I look at it as the poor practitioners subsidise my training...
Take my tkd school - maybe 3/4 of the students are fairly poor, a few are reasonable and a very few are good or better.
If it weren't for the poor and not so good ones paying every month then the school just wouldn't be.
I try to work with the good or better to continue bringing myself up, and when I work with the not so good I occasionally see them step up (at least part of) a level.
Yes it's sometimes irksome when people use the poor as representative examples of the art - but I try to remember that they're not me, I can be better.
As for when I see them doing stuff hideously wrong? Yeah, I might make some internal sarcastic comments - but I do that everywhere anyway
I think as long as there are some who are passionate and want to put in effort to improve then the ones who can't simply keep access available.
Oh, plus they're really easy to beat in competition which helps my vanity
