bcbernam777 said:
I had a conversation with an MA supplier 2 days ago, when I quizzed him on Marketing strategy involved in setting up an MA school. Without going in to great detail, the essence of what he was saying is that to make a success of any MA school, you essentially have to become a Mcdojo/belt factory and that by and large people want to live in a fantasy and dont want to put the hard yards in to actually obtain true fighting skill. When I suggested that I did not want to water down the art to make it marketable, he basically said to me, "then you are going to have look at it as a hobby, teach a few people because that is as far as it is going to get".
Does everyone out there think that is true???????????????
No.
What, exactly, is a McDojo? People have a difficult time coming to a consensus on this. I saw one criteria being the school's location in a strip mall...which is a great location but doesn't necessarily reflect poorly on the school.
The definitions of "McDojo" vary...and some of the people casting the allegations around are people who have failed to make a commercial venture successful (or who fear they'll fail).
The term "McDojo" suggests a franchise like McDonalds. The word makes one think of ingesting an unhealthy product. The analogy fails, however, as many martial arts franchises are extraordinarily expensive. A Big Mac is not going to strain a person's budget. That said, some perfectly good martial arts schools are expensive--training at the Inosanto Academy is not cheap. We might liken these schools to four star restaurants if we extend the analogy that far (and I don't think Inosanto would be adverse to strip mall locations).
Currently one of my franchised competitiors charges $100 a month for two one-half hour lessons a week. Younger children have classes of twenty minutes for the same price. Up to green belt no forms are taught without first paying an extra fee.
After green belt (actually a "camo" belt) the rates go to $200 a month, and they're allowed five classes a week...BUT have to sign a three year contract, purchase fighting equipment, purchase weapons, extra patches. I know of another school that requires a different uniform for different days of the week. Patches are required for all uniforms, and patches are awarded to the students at every turn and are very loosely based on merit. I don't think there is anything wrong with patches, note...unless it generates a ridiculous amount of revenue and significantly lightens the wallet of the parents.
Some schools take students through stripe belts. A number of variations of these are offered through wholesalers. While there is nothing wrong with stripe belts, charging a test fee for every one of them can rack up huge amounts of revenue. Students might test every eight weeks in some schools, going through stripes, tips, tape or what have you. Some students will go through thirty or so tests...and pay thirty test fees.
I use the stripe belts. I find they're useful in keeping students motivated to train. It takes four to seven years for a kid to get to black belt in my school...without those stripes they get frustrated and quit. Note that I don't charge for stripes...and they have to take a comprehensive test to earn them.
There is nothing wrong with students having a rich fantasy about the martial arts...particularly children. Adults need to be gently disabused of their illusions, but we can indulge the kids a bit. At some point we have to teach kids that one can't kick seven people while airborne, that lying on a bed of nails while blocks are shattered on your stomach isn't really a big deal, and that there are tricks to certain board/brick breaks that make it look harder than it really is.
Taking undue profit from their illusions is unethical.
Regards,
Steve