Sai breaking sword

OP
P

PhotonGuy

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,224
Reaction score
575
My sarcasm still stands. All of the video is crap. The sai sword breaking technique cannot be martial arts "gold" while the double sai choke defense complete crap. Is this video is why you started the thread? Next time link the video first, that way we can realize the kind of delusion were dealing with.

Edit: haha dirty dog just said the same thing whike I was typing this :)
No. I had heard of sais being able to break swords many times before and that's why I started the thread. I found the video way after starting the thread.
 
OP
P

PhotonGuy

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,224
Reaction score
575
Not necessary, I'm not looking for a school

Well the guy that runs the place has been teaching for over forty five years and is well renowned in the area. And there are multiple instructors who do teach different styles.
 

Transk53

The Dark Often Prevails
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
4,220
Reaction score
836
Location
England 43 Anno Domini
It usually is made from solid steel. Sometime it's square shape.

jian.jpg

Yeah, bet they are a little heavy. Nice balance?
 

Transk53

The Dark Often Prevails
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
4,220
Reaction score
836
Location
England 43 Anno Domini
No. I had heard of sais being able to break swords many times before and that's why I started the thread. I found the video way after starting the thread.

Seriously PG, you got to start using citations with this stuff. Saying I had heard is like saying. "I was as the bus stop the other day, and this dude started talking about breaking swords man. Dude pass me the blunt!"
 

Tony Dismukes

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
7,577
Reaction score
7,611
Location
Lexington, KY
Seriously PG, you got to start using citations with this stuff. Saying I had heard is like saying. "I was as the bus stop the other day, and this dude started talking about breaking swords man. Dude pass me the blunt!"

That is not a citation.

For what it's worth, I've also heard and read the same story on more than one occasion, although I couldn't tell you from memory who was making the claims. I have enough background knowledge to know that the story is bogus, but not everyone has that background.
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,363
Reaction score
9,102
Location
Pueblo West, CO
For what it's worth, I've also heard and read the same story on more than one occasion, although I couldn't tell you from memory who was making the claims. I have enough background knowledge to know that the story is bogus, but not everyone has that background.

I'll go so far as to say that anyone who has earned a black belt in any art ought to have the background to know silliness when they hear it.
 

Tony Dismukes

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
7,577
Reaction score
7,611
Location
Lexington, KY
I'll go so far as to say that anyone who has earned a black belt in any art ought to have the background to know silliness when they hear it.
That would be nice, but a huge amount of the martial arts-based silliness I've heard over the years has come from black belt ranked practitioners. Sometimes it comes from actual instructors.
 
OP
P

PhotonGuy

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,224
Reaction score
575
I'll go so far as to say that anyone who has earned a black belt in any art ought to have the background to know silliness when they hear it.

That in itself is a silliness right there.
 
OP
P

PhotonGuy

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,224
Reaction score
575
That would be nice, but a huge amount of the martial arts-based silliness I've heard over the years has come from black belt ranked practitioners. Sometimes it comes from actual instructors.

Amen.
 

Grenadier

Sr. Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
10,826
Reaction score
617
From all sorts of sources, books, magazine articles, martial arts discussions. I've always been a bit skeptical about it that's why I started the thread.

That's why it's important to get actual hands-on experience when it comes to learning a martial art.

Books and other such literary sources are best used as supplements for those who already have a goodly amount of actual experience. When used as such, they can help someone sharpen up technique that is already at a decent level.

Someone who is already at that level where he can benefit from the above mentioned media, has a much better chance of understanding what is mechanically correct, and what is not. Furthermore, he can also discard information that he knows is incorrect.

The newbie to the art will not benefit from such things, and could very well ignorantly end up taking garbage information as gospel.


When teaching someone how to use the sai, it's probably a good idea to forbid the new student from looking at videos, books, etc., until after he's had a good bit of live basic training, and is able to show that he can perform the techniques with proper mechanics.

It's also important that someone learning to use the sai start with a pair of sai that have at least a decent measure of balance to them. This is something that the newbie will probably not understand.

Otherwise, it's all too easy to end up with someone who tries to flip a sai by raising his elbow, or scrunching his shoulder, or cocking his wrist, instead of simply letting the sai flip out and back on its own with a simple, straightforward movement of the arm. Or, the above mentioned would-be practitioner might end up with poor synchronicity between the lower body and the upper body, leading to his use of only his upper body to perform his strikes.

To make things worse, the above mentioned hypothetical newbie might be trying to learn using a pair of junk sai like the ones in the video you linked. There are many times that someone found the "Daredevil / Elektra Sai Set" or the "Raphael Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Sai Set" on E-bay or at an Asian grocery store (yes, there are quite a few of them), and finds out that what his instructor told him won't work with horribly unbalanced pieces of junk, leading to his use of the above mentioned incorrect mechanics.

This usually ends up in having a difficult task of making someone unlearn bad mechanics in order to learn the proper ones, which will usually take more time than someone learning proper ones from the start.


To put it another way:

It's no different than a neophyte attempting to learn judo by watching a video, and trying to throw someone just using his hands and arms, while ignoring the critical use of the lower body in such techniques, and finding out that in an actual fight, his improvised judo mechanics are worthless. He might be thinking "but I grabbed the opponent in the same place where that guy on the video did, and I moved my arms in the exact same way he did too! Why doesn't it work?!?" without realizing that he missed many a critically important aspect of the basic, fundamental mechanics that would have easily been there with proper live training.
 
Last edited:

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
From all sorts of sources, books, magazine articles, martial arts discussions. I've always been a bit skeptical about it that's why I started the thread.

I've heard from all sorts of 'sources' that you can't get pregnant if you have sex standing up does that mean it's true?
 
OP
P

PhotonGuy

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,224
Reaction score
575
That's why it's important to get actual hands-on experience when it comes to learning a martial art.

Books and other such literary sources are best used as supplements for those who already have a goodly amount of actual experience. When used as such, they can help someone sharpen up technique that is already at a decent level.

Someone who is already at that level where he can benefit from the above mentioned media, has a much better chance of understanding what is mechanically correct, and what is not. Furthermore, he can also discard information that he knows is incorrect.

The newbie to the art will not benefit from such things, and could very well ignorantly end up taking garbage information as gospel.


When teaching someone how to use the sai, it's probably a good idea to forbid the new student from looking at videos, books, etc., until after he's had a good bit of live basic training, and is able to show that he can perform the techniques with proper mechanics.

It's also important that someone learning to use the sai start with a pair of sai that have at least a decent measure of balance to them. This is something that the newbie will probably not understand.

Otherwise, it's all too easy to end up with someone who tries to flip a sai by raising his elbow, or scrunching his shoulder, or cocking his wrist, instead of simply letting the sai flip out and back on its own with a simple, straightforward movement of the arm. Or, the above mentioned would-be practitioner might end up with poor synchronicity between the lower body and the upper body, leading to his use of only his upper body to perform his strikes.

To make things worse, the above mentioned hypothetical newbie might be trying to learn using a pair of junk sai like the ones in the video you linked. There are many times that someone found the "Daredevil / Elektra Sai Set" or the "Raphael Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Sai Set" on E-bay or at an Asian grocery store (yes, there are quite a few of them), and finds out that what his instructor told him won't work with horribly unbalanced pieces of junk, leading to his use of the above mentioned incorrect mechanics.

This usually ends up in having a difficult task of making someone unlearn bad mechanics in order to learn the proper ones, which will usually take more time than someone learning proper ones from the start.


To put it another way:

It's no different than a neophyte attempting to learn judo by watching a video, and trying to throw someone just using his hands and arms, while ignoring the critical use of the lower body in such techniques, and finding out that in an actual fight, his improvised judo mechanics are worthless. He might be thinking "but I grabbed the opponent in the same place where that guy on the video did, and I moved my arms in the exact same way he did too! Why doesn't it work?!?" without realizing that he missed many a critically important aspect of the basic, fundamental mechanics that would have easily been there with proper live training.

What you say makes sense but there's some things that should be realized. For one thing, hands on training has its limitations too. For one thing you can't always go full speed or full force while training. For somebody to swing a katana full speed and for you to attempt to catch it with a sai you can't do in training, simply for safety reasons. Sometimes a good way to know what a weapon was used for is by researching history, which is often done through books provided that you've got a good source. For instance, the jitte, a weapon that's similar to the sai except it has only one hook as opposed to two was apparently used by Japanese police and was used to catch and immobilize sword blades. My source for that claim is from the Martial Arts Encyclopedia by Larry Winderbaum although I wouldn't recommend trying to back that up by getting a jitte and having somebody swing at you full speed with a katana. As you said, somebody should get proper training to understand the mechanics of an art including a weapon used in that art, but as I said before, I was skeptical about what I heard about being able to catch and break swords with sais, and so that's why I started this thread.
 

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,275
Reaction score
9,390
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
Jitte

I had heard the Jitte (Jutte) being used to catch a sword as well but I have also heard that, like the sai breaking a katana, was a myth

Not that Wiki is always a reliable source but this was there

A popular misconception is that the kagi is used to catch a sword. It could possibly be used for this purpose, but the kagi's proximity to the hand would make it rather dangerous. When faced with a swordsman, a more likely use for the kagi would be to capture and arrest the blade after blocking it with the boshin. The kagi 's more common use is to hook into clothing or parts of the body like the nose or mouth, or to push into joints or other weak points on the body. It also could be used to hook the thumb while holding the weapon backwards, to allow different techniques such as punches and blocks, very similarly to a sai. The jitte can also be used in much the same manner as other short sticks or batons, to strike large muscle groups and aid in joint manipulation

Not saying it is a fact, just saying it would constitute more research
 

Latest Discussions

Top