I've been a fan of Tolkien since I was young and I've heard this rumor again and again and again. Is there any truth to it? Can you see this philosophy in his work? What do you think about this?
But Tolkien was, in his choleric way, giving voice to his deepest convictions regarding the ideal form of human society—albeit fleeting voice. The text of his sole anarcho-monarchist manifesto, such as it is, comes from a letter he wrote to his son Christopher in 1943 (forgive me for quoting at such length):
My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning the abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs)—or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy. I would arrest anybody who uses the word State (in any sense other than the inanimate real of England and its inhabitants, a thing that has neither power, rights nor mind); and after a chance of recantation, execute them if they remained obstinate! If we could go back to personal names, it would do a lot of good. Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so to refer to people. . . .
I've been a fan of Tolkien since I was young and I've heard this rumor again and again and again. Is there any truth to it? Can you see this philosophy in his work? What do you think about this?
Not popular, but Tolkein, along with CS Lewis were both Christians and wrote many allegorical elements into their stories about their faith. From a Christian standpoint, there are many that feel in a perfect Christian community, you would not need any government because everyone would be looking out for and helping each other. So, in it's loosest sense of anarchy meaning no formal government, then I can see that. Same with a "divine monarchy" going with the Christian viewpoint of God being that divine monarch as the Hebrews used to have before King Saul.
Why is the song Anarchy In The UK now running though my demented little noggin :uhyeah:
One of my pet hates is book clubs, I can't think of anything worse than sitting discussing a book you've read to bits so that everything you enjoyed about the book is analysed to death so that you don't enjoy it anymore. People will find things that resonate for them in any book, they may recognise situations, feelings etc in books that seem personal to them or they see as have greater meanings for the world, however most authors don't write with that aim in mind. Authors of fiction write for many reasons, mostly though to entertain and hopefully make them money. the advice given to budding authors is write about what you know, Tolkien wrote about what he knew which adds depth to his writings, that his best subjects were languages and Christianity are incidental. He knew his own religion best so it made sense to write from that point of view, as zDom has said, he wrote fiction that was consistent with his views. If he wrote from a different or non religious view the stories may have lacked depth as he wasn't as au fait with other beliefs.
'Biblical' stories are commonly found in other religions and cultures too.
To clarify, Lewis wrote allegories but JRRT despised them (many, many quotes on this subject).
JRRT wrote a fictional world that he felt was consistent with Catholic/Christian beliefs.
Any connections you make may be fun to explore but they were not conscious attempts by the author to make any point about anything. He was just trying to create an epic mythology for England; he was just telling stories.
There are many, MANY biblical elements that can be seen throughout his works, however, if that is what you meant.
I recently wrote a very long, probably boring term paper on this exact subject
The Adventures of
Huckleberry Finn
by
Mark Twain
NOTICE
PERSONS
attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be
prosecuted;
persons attempting to find a moral in it will be
banished;
persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.
By Order Of The Author,
Per G.G., Chief of Ordnance
Can I ask the foundation of this idea that Tolkien's works were Christian in any sense? From what I know they were anything but as they are grounded in Celtic and Norse mythology. I suppose that it can be argued that the Christian mythology was founded as much upon them as it was Babylonian mysticism but that's as close as it gets.
Can I ask the foundation of this idea that Tolkien's works were Christian in any sense? From what I know they were anything but as they are grounded in Celtic and Norse mythology. I suppose that it can be argued that the Christian mythology was founded as much upon them as it was Babylonian mysticism but that's as close as it gets.
If you want, I will email my paper to you
Evidently I am unable to answer this question in less than 20-odd pages =)
Can I ask the foundation of this idea that Tolkien's works were Christian in any sense? From what I know they were anything but as they are grounded in Celtic and Norse mythology. I suppose that it can be argued that the Christian mythology was founded as much upon them as it was Babylonian mysticism but that's as close as it gets.