I wanted to start a thread to discuss the origin of the Pyung-Ahn Hyungs. These forms cross the arts back and forth and are recognizable in many systems. Consequently, because of the politics involved, the stories have gotten somewhat muddled.
Here is what I learned...
In TSD it is acknowledged that Master Itosu "created" them, but the story I learned gets more complicated. For instance, Pyung Ahn Ee Dan is said to be a derivitive of a Chinese form called Jae Non and I've heard (but not actually have seen) that some Kung Fu styles still do this form. Anyway, Master Itosu is said to have "adapted" Jae Non and its techniques into Pyung on Ee, Sam, Sa, and O. Pyung Ahn Cho Dan is accredited to Master Itosu's senior student.
Maybe this is a load of crap. Maybe not. That is what I am trying to figure out.
upnorthkyosa
Here is what I learned...
In TSD it is acknowledged that Master Itosu "created" them, but the story I learned gets more complicated. For instance, Pyung Ahn Ee Dan is said to be a derivitive of a Chinese form called Jae Non and I've heard (but not actually have seen) that some Kung Fu styles still do this form. Anyway, Master Itosu is said to have "adapted" Jae Non and its techniques into Pyung on Ee, Sam, Sa, and O. Pyung Ahn Cho Dan is accredited to Master Itosu's senior student.
Maybe this is a load of crap. Maybe not. That is what I am trying to figure out.
upnorthkyosa