Ok under further reading and understanding this is the arguement to present to the US Supreme Court by the DC of Columbia.
I still do not believe it should be an arguement of not applying at all. If that is true it is a very slippery slope of what does apply and what does not apply. I understand it states State Militia, yet if it comes own to this, then would the states then be required to have a state militia.I am not talking about the National Guard because it has National in the title, it is not a state milita, no matter where the money comes from. in my opion.
I still do not believe it should be an arguement of not applying at all. If that is true it is a very slippery slope of what does apply and what does not apply. I understand it states State Militia, yet if it comes own to this, then would the states then be required to have a state militia.I am not talking about the National Guard because it has National in the title, it is not a state milita, no matter where the money comes from. in my opion.